My understanding is he was NOT kicked out of Trek-BBS, but rather he requested to have his account deleted.kicked out of pretty much every forum dedicated to the franchise
My understanding is he was NOT kicked out of Trek-BBS, but rather he requested to have his account deleted.kicked out of pretty much every forum dedicated to the franchise
I think you're confusing Alec Peters with Tobias Richter as the latter made a big deal of requesting his account be deleted and then was upset when he checked and it showed as 'Banned' (Because that's the only way to inactivate an account with this version of BBS software.My understanding is he was NOT kicked out of Trek-BBS, but rather he requested to have his account deleted.
My name is Neil and I'm disgusted by the behavior of Alec Peters.From a post in the closed Axanar Fan Facebook Group (parenthetical statement added for clarity)
Alec Peters: ..........."Their (that is "the haters) actions make it clear why they have all failed in their personal lives to achieve anything. They are too busy tearing down others."
There's no doubt about this. Look how the Star Trek Continues campaign is struggling. They're only 25% funded with a month to go.The sad part is that all this must be killing other fan film's fundraising efforts.
After skimming the response, I actually suspect that the most compelling arguments would be the "premature" and "impermissible restraint" arguments. I'm very curious to hear a lawyer's take on this issue, especially with respect to the cited cases.
That said...
Wouldn't there be an argument that Axanar has already admitted that they intend to violate Plantiff's copyright? It says so all over their kickstarter and indiegogo campaigns. If I'm thinking logically, I would think that the court would be obligated to act here, other issues aside. If the court knows someone intends to commit an illegal act, and they have the authority to prevent it, don't they have an obligation to do so?
If that's the case, I would think that Axanar is sunk in any event.
Thoughts?
Also, here is a new interview with me about the Star Trek: The Original Series Soundtrack Collection which I co-produced for La-La Land Records.
Another comment from the closed FB Axanar Fan Club group - this time it is Terry Mcintosh, the "digital guru" of Ares Studios and the creator of the "revolutionary" Ares something or other perk fulfillment software delivery service something and also an admin of the various Axanar groups, who is discussing the "haters."
You have folks that are rather insignificant (“writers” and low-end podcast) folks that are using their manufactured drama to help boost their brands, you have some folks that behaved poorly and were ejected from the Axanar group(s) for it, you have some folks that don’t care for Alec personally and that has carried over toward Axanar, you have a single handful that are involved (or were involved in the past) with “competing” productions that are predictably competitive, you have some folks that are weak of character and simply enjoy the drama, and you have a vast majority that are merely spectators.
That all said, it’s only Star Trek and it’s only Facebook. *shrug* Losers whine and winners have sh*t to do, which is why I, and many others, don’t bother with such people.
That is a good question are the donations taxable income for the corporation since they are not a 501(c)(3)?wondering if first, they have to achieve "Let's make sure the IRS forgets the name: NOTAXANAR!"
Wouldn't there be an argument that Axanar has already admitted that they intend to violate Plantiff's copyright? It says so all over their kickstarter and indiegogo campaigns. If I'm thinking logically, I would think that the court would be obligated to act here, other issues aside. If the court knows someone intends to commit an illegal act, and they have the authority to prevent it, don't they have an obligation to do so?
That is a good question are the donations taxable income for the corporation since they are not a 501(c)(3)?
The donations are taxable income for Axanar, but if they spend all the money within the tax year there is no tax due.That is a good question are the donations taxable income for the corporation since they are not a 501(c)(3)?
From a post in the closed Axanar Fan Facebook Group (parenthetical statement added for clarity)
Alec Peters: ..........."Their (that is "the haters) actions make it clear why they have all failed in their personal lives to achieve anything. They are too busy tearing down others."
...but if you spend all the money within the tax year there is no tax due.
From a post in the closed Axanar Fan Facebook Group (parenthetical statement added for clarity)
Alec Peters: ..........."Their (that is "the haters) actions make it clear why they have all failed in their personal lives to achieve anything. They are too busy tearing down others."
My name is Neil and I'm disgusted by the behavior of Alec Peters.
Also, here is a new interview with me about the Star Trek: The Original Series Soundtrack Collection which I co-produced for La-La Land Records. I'm happily married and working on more officially authorized Star Trek stuff in addition to many other official soundtrack projects.
You were saying, Mr. Peters?
Neil
Yes, Alec Peters and his various sock puppets were banned. Conversely, Tobias Richter had his account deleted at his request--which, as somewhat of a misnomer, is also called a ban.I think you're confusing Alec Peters with Tobias Richter as the latter made a big deal of requesting his account be deleted and then was upset when he checked and it showed as 'Banned' (Because that's the only way to inactivate an account with this version of BBS software.
Of course with Mr. Peters - he had a number of Alt/Dupe accounts on this BBS at one time (another rule violation, but I guess when you're Alec Peters, rules only apply if you want them to.)
Thanks for the link!I found a copy of the response
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2778642-Axanar-Vulcan.html
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.