Alec doesn't know any other way to communicate, beyond hypocritically changing his opinions with the wind if it suits his purpose (see: Justin Lin tweet.)
If anything, it's all been revelatory that the only thing he really cares about is looking good to the sad sacks still supporting him. If he can claim bragging rights that even Lin is on his side, so much the better. I can't speak to what it will do for the case itself, but it seems as far as Alec is concerned, he has no problem right now swiping his innumerable statements about the reboots under the rug so he can do what he does best - sucking up to people more talented than he is.
He's the very definition of man-child with his petty and arbitrary fickleness and temper tantrums, but the hypocrisy just gets worse and worse at each turn.
He's long past the point of no return (as far as salvaging his reputation and any future career prospects)......so in his mind, why not continue with this delusion?? (If he's going to go down, go down in a blaze of glory and to hell with anyone or anything else.........)
I wonder how the Axaturds are gonna respond to Peters treasonous statements?!?![]()
Yeah, I've listened to a majority of the Axanar podcasts. Burnett and Peters take every opportunity to trash the new Trek movies, so I find the camp saying how much they're excited for Beyond a bit disingenuous.
Kirk and Spock had cowboy diplomacy.
Alec Peters has crybaby diplomacy.
He has NO diplomacyKirk and Spock had cowboy diplomacy.
Alec Peters has crybaby diplomacy.
AP has always had a flexible relationship with the truth.Yeah, I've listened to a majority of the Axanar podcasts. Burnett and Peters take every opportunity to trash the new Trek movies, so I find the camp saying how much they're excited for Beyond a bit disingenuous.
I dunno. He seems to stretch it far whenever not breaking it outright.AP has always had a flexible relationship with the truth.
I've been waiting a long, long time to post these.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The Smithsonian has as much right to use the Enterprise as they do Kermit the Frog or The Wizard of Oz.Smithsonian is well aware they don't own the image of the Starship Enterprise. They can't authorize movies or books. They own the physical object NOT the rights to the concept etc.
Trek "belongs to the fans" just like the Mona Lisa does.
Yeah. We all enjoy it and can appreciate it, but try walking out the door of the Louvre with it. You'd make it about no-where-near-it-in-the-first-place because France owns it. Not you.
If Trek belongs to the fans, then "we" own it. Not Alec Peters.
Not so far above prevailing minimum wage, at least here on the West Coast, where the $125/day minimum for SAG-AFTRA's ultra-low budget rate hovers right around minimum wage.Yes, but not meeting a minimum wage law would not only be SAG violation, but would be, well, a wage law violation. (Importantly, SAG New Media doesn't require talent to be reimbursed at any rate higher than the prevailing minimum wage laws require. (Non-New Media contracts *do* have SAG scale minimums which are, of course, far in excess of prevailing minimum wage rates.)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.