Just as an aside. Why is Peters such a total wanker?
I hope the mods will forgive my language, but the more I see from him the more I feel he is a really detestable individual. Being a lawyer myself I'm in one of those professiosl where you encounter so many people, and both in terms of professional colleagues and the public. He's one of these awful people who can hoodwink the easily led, but is clearly loathsome (even if he ends up being judged in the right in this litigation).
Sorry, I know that has nothing to do with the case and I should know better. But I was reading some of his replies on THR and the more I read the more awful this man appears to me. Even if he has done no wrong legally, this guy is clearly the sort who bullshits and manipulates his way through things as much as he can. Anyone with half a brain can see it.
Sorry, rant over. Back to normal service.