Would the fact that it doesn't have a registry number tend to make one believe that it's more in line with a Runabout or an old-style Captain's Yacht?
Runabouts have registry numbers.
Would the fact that it doesn't have a registry number tend to make one believe that it's more in line with a Runabout or an old-style Captain's Yacht?
It's the TNG arrowhead & it's backwards. I think this is probably just a concept version, & the final version will be a little cleaned up & have the registry added....
Also, are we sure that the "USS Franklin" and arrowhead on the nacelle are authentic? Someone earlier in this thread thought it looked (poorly) photoshopped.
Many possibilities:
1. It's been on the surface for maybe a century. The registry wore off.
2. They didn't put it in the concept art for some reason (don't know what it is yet, didn't care, major spoiler, etc...).
I think we're supposed to assume it's an early Starfleet exploration vessel that somehow went too deep in space.
Also, are we sure that the "USS Franklin" and arrowhead on the nacelle are authentic? Someone earlier in this thread thought it looked (poorly) photoshopped.
The overall response I have is "Meh." I don't care for how the bridge picture window is so prominent. Just feels odd for a ship designed to function in the 3D environment of space.
...What is there to see dead ahead that would be relevant for the helmsman of a starship?
For general navigation, nothing in the universe would be close enough to allow for naked-eye piloting. And if something did get that close, the tunnel vision would not be of any help: parking the ship in a spacedock, or flying combat maneuvers against acrobatic opponents, or hovering over a volcano, would call for synthetic situational awareness anyway. So what is that window for?
Timo Saloniemi
Agreed, the ship should have forward windows more similar to a shuttle if it must have them. It's a bit goofy having a full sized window on a ship this tiny. Then again, this is just concept art.This is what I meant @BillJ
Aesthetics are a good thing, but the USS Franklin's bridge window is too big and too prominent for my taste.
Yep. I have always felt the nuTrek ships picture windows are beautiful, but impractical. They need to be less prominent and better situated.Agreed, the ship should have forward windows more similar to a shuttle if it must have them. It's a bit goofy having a full sized window on a ship this tiny. Then again, this is just concept art.
Kirk almost had a head on collision with the Reliant which would have been easily avoided if the viewscreen was also transparent.
Then again, Kirk and Sulu would have been blinded if exposed directly to the bright head-on light show in the nebula...
...What is there to see dead ahead that would be relevant for the helmsman of a starship?
For general navigation, nothing in the universe would be close enough to allow for naked-eye piloting. And if something did get that close, the tunnel vision would not be of any help: parking the ship in a spacedock, or flying combat maneuvers against acrobatic opponents, or hovering over a volcano, would call for synthetic situational awareness anyway. So what is that window for?
Timo Saloniemi
If it has blast shutters, active flare reduction, polarisation and nano-tubual reinforcement, go for it.
Not if any competant engineer...oh who am I kidding, this is Starfleet, it's a wonder they aren't glueing Lego together and calling it constuction.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.