• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would people throw money at this guy when he has two shorts to his name?

you should sue. doubtless there was a time when you considered everything Trek to be exceptional, if not pure. now you can't even imagine what it would be like to still be holding that view. look what's been taken from you ;-)

[not a personal comment, of course]
 
He's been alluding to it in multiple posts all over Facebook as recently as yesterday in his efforts to defend his obnoxious comments in Monday's 1701news article. He's been blasting both James Cawley and Vic, ranting about having to serve a cease and desist on Vic for his "constant defamation" against Axanar going all the way back to the premiere of Prelude. He's been making quite a spectacle of himself.
Defamation?
 
Alec Peters claimed to me that this corporation was created to protect this particular asset, the townhouse that is listed as the corporate address (in public documents). He has no mortgage on that property (that I can see), so the only thing between him and changing the ownership is to simply file a quitclaim deed, and pay the appropriate tax (which takes all of 10 minutes). In fact, even the tax itself would not be a big issue, because he could just claim the value of $100, and pay just 70 cents.

I am leaning toward giving him the benefit of the doubt that he intended to use this corporation to shield assets. But here's the thing ... he hasn't. And he's had a year to do something that takes just 10 minutes, and 70 cents.

So let's say the Axanar lawsuit goes to court. CBS/Paramount wins a massive judgement, in this example ... more money than what Peters has on hand. CBS/Paramount will be able to go after the townhouse in Florida ... why? Because Peters is named in the suit, which means he's personally liable. And as of right now (or, depending on the law, at the time the lawsuit was filed) that townhouse is under his personal name.

If he had transferred ownership to Woodland Terrace Investments a year ago, or even six months ago, it would be harder for CBS/Paramount to come after that asset as a way to fulfill the judgement. That's why you would create an LLC to protect a property, and you would do it by transferring the property to that LLC. You still "own" the property, but as the controlling member of the corporation.

That doesn't make you completely immune to having the asset forfeited -- but it does make it a lot harder.
As I recall, doesn't Florida have a particularly broad and robust homestead exemption law that protects real property from creditors? I remember it came into play in the O.J. Simpson wrongful death civil suit and it was why the Goldmans couldn't touch his Florida property. I don't think the law has changed much since then except for some very specific carveouts. Perhaps he concluded that the property was safe enough under Florida law to make the other steps either unnecessary or at least not urgent.
 
If he were wealthy, why would he need to raise fan money and pay himself a relatively meager salary?
When he first announced the project, he said he was committing $50,000 "of his own money". He deliberately gave the impression he was wealthy and experienced, to people who wrote stories or maybe just printed press releases. He knows how to promote himself.
 
Last edited:
Did someone really call Dennis "Sweety" a page or so ago? :eek:
Yeah, that was me. And when I saw the reply I felt immediate chagrin. Rightfully so because I went back & looked at my post I saw how it didn't read with the same softness of voice that I was thinking in while typing. Totally my bad.

I have read articles and opinions with conclusions (suppositions) of some kind of settlement or "Win-Win" scenario, as was mentioned upthread. I wonder if the "Fact" of this notion, Posted by various posters, comes from articles like the one I linked below. It is older, but note the words towards the end...???
http://sccougar.com/2016/01/01/paramount-cbs-file-lawsuit-against-axanar.html
Not one I'd seen or the type I'd been reading.

I agree with the opinion and feeling that CBS will (have to) go for blood first.
I get that. Yup. And that would certainly be closer to my personal preferences even if I do think (as of this time) it will go otherwise.
 
Last edited:
"You'll know you're in the Star Trek universe immediately."
-Alec Peters

Neil
"I am a lawyer...I've never practiced but..."
-Alec Peters

The part that I found particularly interesting was how crystal clear it is that his biggest takeaway and thrill from all of this is all of the "Hollywood" attention *he* is getting.

"I don't think there's anything that we could have done that would have given us a bigger presence in Hollywood than CBS and Paramount suing us. And now everyone in Hollywood knows what Axanar is." -Alec Peters

"I've been interviewed by…!"

"Web traffic is through the roof!"

"Donations are up," which he quickly backtracks to state that they stopped taking donations, cuz, ya know, that would be bad to do while they are being sued (except of course we know they haven't fully stopped taking donations, just the IGG campaign).

Oy.
 
As I recall, doesn't Florida have a particularly broad and robust homestead exemption law that protects real property from creditors? I remember it came into play in the O.J. Simpson wrongful death civil suit and it was why the Goldmans couldn't touch his Florida property. I don't think the law has changed much since then except for some very specific carveouts. Perhaps he concluded that the property was safe enough under Florida law to make the other steps either unnecessary or at least not urgent.

ONLY if you are able to claim a homestead exemption. Investment properties are not protected the same way.

As far as I can tell, he is paying taxes without any homestead exemption (although I could be misreading it). In order to be homesteaded, it must be his primary residence. But even in his ownership paperwork, he lists his primary address in California.
 
ONLY if you are able to claim a homestead exemption. Investment properties are not protected the same way.

As far as I can tell, he is paying taxes without any homestead exemption (although I could be misreading it). In order to be homesteaded, it must be his primary residence. But even in his ownership paperwork, he lists his primary address in California.
Of course. You're absolutely right. For some reason I was thinking the woman who lives there with her kids was also on the title with him which may (or may not) offer some protection under homestead since it is her primary residence apparently. Oh well. It's his private business, not ours. If he's left it (and her) vulnerable, particularly under his current precarious circumstances, that's his problem to deal with.
 
Well, after the incident with 1701 News and Alec, I can't say I blame any Trek fan news source staying away from anybody from Team Axanar. Don't we have one of the hosts on TBBS? Maybe they can speak to the point.
 
Well, after the incident with 1701 News and Alec, I can't say I blame any Trek fan news source staying away from anybody from Team Axanar. Don't we have one of the hosts on TBBS? Maybe they can speak to the point.
The only people who believe Alec was taken out of context are the people who would believe the world was flat if Alec tweeted it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top