In this thread? I'd love to read.Yep. I posted the conversation between her and Amanda, when she explains why she doesn't look like the pictures Spock sent of her.![]()

In this thread? I'd love to read.Yep. I posted the conversation between her and Amanda, when she explains why she doesn't look like the pictures Spock sent of her.![]()
What Was It Even About
I watched the episode twice.
I couldn’t tell you what the episode is actually about. It's about an hour and seven minutes is all I could come up with. Now things happened — there is a romance, a mystery and some connect the canon. But nothing of consequence happens.
There is no theme, no real story. Nothing interesting is revealed about the characters. The problem lies in that the episode can’t decide what to focus on, so it devolves into a procedural. I ached for a moment when I cared why Kirk cared so much for Carol (more on that in a bit).
Is the episode about the consequences of taking scientific shortcuts? Could’ve been, but the person who took the shortcut died in the opening explosion.
A Scripted Romance
The underlying problem is that the story’s foundation is weak. This is the story of how Kirk and Carol wined, dined and fell madly in love. But it doesn’t feel authentic. It feels forced.
Instead of building a believable affair, we get them together because it’s canon. Not for one minute do I feel that these two are attracted to each other.
Kirk is smitten so quickly, far more quickly than any romance in the original series. And they haven’t spent enough time with each other, or had a meaningful encounter to get us there. Sure there’s the moment in Carol’s quarters. But that scene is so wrought with on-the-nose dialogue that it’s banal. There’s no spark.
After Kirk rescues Carol, he says they have to figure out what’s wrong with the transporter because “we don’t want to lose you again.” Kirk’s affections and connections are all a melodramatic dime turn.
How much time is actually passing here? Days maybe? The last moment between them felt unearned, once again we have to connect the dots to THE WRATH OF KHAN. I can’t buy it. With Edith, weeks passed on 1930s Earth. With Miramaniee, nearly two months go by. But days later and Kirk is ready to give up his command for Carol.
Kirk says to Bones that Carol is unique. We’re told that, but we’re not shown how she’s any different than the blonde technician Gary Mitchell aimed at him. Or Dr. Janet Wallace. Or Ruth. Or … pick a blonde. (Thankfully, they didn’t make Carol the blonde lab technician.)
I know I posted this somewhere on the forum recently, but I don't remember where. Anyway, this is how the explanation for the two different Saaviks went (read Amanda's dialogue first):In this thread? I'd love to read.![]()
I know, and I tried. But there was no way to make everything fit without either obscuring too much of the characters or making the font too small to read. Maybe if I can find a different-sized picture of this scene I can redo it.^^^Trouble with that is we read top down not bottom up. Amanda's caption ought to be first.
As much effort as everyone put into this episode, it begs the question? Apart from squashing the theory of the little blonde lab tech Mitchell steered at Kirk in the Academy, is there enough here for a whole episode? There are some beautifully crafted scenes, but nothing much seems to happen in them storywise.
I see no problem with continuity porn as long as it is part of an episode.
Today around 200 people volunteer their time to produce each episode of "Star Trek: New Voyages." The show is filmed in an old dollar store in Ticonderoga, New York. Each show takes about four to six months to produce, and costs about $50,000, all donated by fans. People have come from all 50 states and as far as Germany and Australia to give their time, money and passion to the show.
No, I built the shuttle interior in Photoshop and Lightwave 3D. The actors were shot on green screen which I also composited.Just started watching. Did you resurrect James Doohan for the 24th century bookends? Did NV build the shuttle interior?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.