So, what does qualify as copyright infringement in Alec Peters world?
Star Trek: Axanar: The Next Generation - coming in 2017 from Dracogen Strategic Investments!
So, what does qualify as copyright infringement in Alec Peters world?
I'm convinced that with over 546 hours in the Star Trek canon, there's bound to be a quote for nearly every conceivable occasion.WIN.I'd give real money if he'd shut up.
You sure? I don't remember it.That was in Arkansas mate.That happened in the courts here in the UK... Juror turned up for Jury Duty in dress uniform with the pips denoting the rank of Commander - even had a Type 1 phaser on the inside of the uniform jacket
Happened in the UK as well
So, what does qualify as copyright infringement in Alec Peters world?
My absolute favorite response to this whole thing appeared in the comments section of the Wall Street Journal article on the subject:
![]()
Sprinkling in the occasional misspelled Klingon word really makes an incoherent rage-gasm sound like a cogent argument, doesn't it? Also, what heck does "Mok!!" mean? I assume it's supposed to be Klingon, but it sounds like a cartoon sound effect.
I wish someone would call this guy as an expert witness.
Oh, and sometimes people like this wonder why Trek fans have a bad rap.
So, what does qualify as copyright infringement in Alec Peters world?
Exactly what he's doing. He's just using the "everyone else is doing it" defense. At least publicly.
This is just so worrisome. I liked the trailer for Axanar, sure, but if every fan film starts getting C&D orders than there will be an explosion of vitriol and it won't be directed at CBS. This is just crazy.
I'm cautiously optimistic.
If I'm CBS/Paramount and I want to shut down fan films in general, I don't file a single lawsuit against the "largest" production; I file lots of lawsuits against all of them, or at least send them immediate C&D's. CBS/Paramount have enough money, and most likely enough legal muscle, to take on more than one small fry at a time and win handily.
That nobody else has been C&D'd, Rengades and others are still up on YouTube (which is an easy one to hit with a DMCA notice), etc., suggests to me that this is exactly what it looks like: CBS/Paramount feel that Axanar specifically overstepped the line.
Of course, I'm not CBS and/or Paramount, nor am I affiliated with them in any way, so take that with a pound of salt or so.
In theory Hansa could be sued, in reality their profit is likely too low to make it worthwhile.That's not a "take", that's fact.
Then that means even the label producer Hansa used is potentially in deep manure, right? Making copies of CBS IP for profit.
Peters must be a hell of a salesperson, or there are just a lot of ignorant people out there who don't know better. Except apparently at Staples and other copy places near where SeerSGB lives. (He posted way back that he has trouble with Staples people wanting to make copies of forms for him for home school use for fear of treading on a copyright.)
Still loads for me.In theory Hansa could be sued, in reality their profit is likely too low to make it worthwhile.Then that means even the label producer Hansa used is potentially in deep manure, right? Making copies of CBS IP for profit.
Peters must be a hell of a salesperson, or there are just a lot of ignorant people out there who don't know better. Except apparently at Staples and other copy places near where SeerSGB lives. (He posted way back that he has trouble with Staples people wanting to make copies of forms for him for home school use for fear of treading on a copyright.)
I think they either realized how serious the situation is or got a C&D. The main Axanar Coffee site was finally taken down.
What gall.The coffee site still appears for me - even has a 2016 copyright trademark
So, what does qualify as copyright infringement in Alec Peters world?
Distribute Axanar tea and find out.
Neil
What gall.The coffee site still appears for me - even has a 2016 copyright trademark![]()
comment on David Gerrolds blog post:
My response is still "awaiting moderation"Alec Peters said:Alec Peters says: January 5, 2016 at 1:01 pm
No one sells coffee with CBS IP on it. We are very careful to not use any CBS IP Axanar characters are not CBS property outside of Soval and Garth, neither of who appears on the coffee.
And yet a Klingon battle cruiser and something that looks an awful lot like the Klingon High Council Chambers appear on the coffee. Not to mention the design of the Klingons, a Klingon and the name Andorian appear on the coffee.
So Klingon culture, D6 and Andoria aren't CBS IP?
That is so beyond delusional... Wouldn't the Klingon logo emblazoned on the coffee bag be owned by CBS... "Andorian Ice" you might get away with, but the D6 on the bag, and the rest of it are more than highly questionable uses of the Star Trek license.
The coffee site still appears for me - even has a 2016 copyright trademark
My absolute favorite response to this whole thing appeared in the comments section of the Wall Street Journal article on the subject:
![]()
Sprinkling in the occasional misspelled Klingon word really makes an incoherent rage-gasm sound like a cogent argument, doesn't it? Also, what heck does "Mok!!" mean? I assume it's supposed to be Klingon, but it sounds like a cartoon sound effect.
I wish someone would call this guy as an expert witness.
The coffee site still appears for me - even has a 2016 copyright trademark
I see the site but no Axanar coffee links.
What gall.The coffee site still appears for me - even has a 2016 copyright trademark![]()
I do not understand your reply
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.