• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

A Solar Black Hole

My Snozberry horizon has a rather large radius.

That's one big Blackberry, which is also not black. Damnit English conventions of colour naming and their surprising lack of adherence to basic photonic wavelength accuracy to their chosen definition!
 
If you're ever unsure about what color something actually is, all you need to do is open a box of Crayons until you find the one that matches.
 
My Snozberry horizon has a rather large radius.

That's one big Blackberry, which is also not black. Damnit English conventions of colour naming and their surprising lack of adherence to basic photonic wavelength accuracy to their chosen definition!
NjmAh_zpshudnqitf.gif

You just blew out my transphasic metagenic framastat with that cacophony of technobabble!
 
1. Intense gravity that does not create orbital patterns but in fact pulls everything to the Red Giant that would normally be on a orbital transit of some type.

Anything can be orbited, even a black hole. There is no object in the universe so massive that it cannot be orbited if you're far enough out from it.
 
1. Intense gravity that does not create orbital patterns but in fact pulls everything to the Red Giant that would normally be on a orbital transit of some type.

Anything can be orbited, even a black hole. There is no object in the universe so massive that it cannot be orbited if you're far enough out from it.

If there were, we'd be getting sucked in as we speak.
 
I've read Dryson's posts in here, and maybe I'm silly, but I'm going to bite:

Dryson, are you trying to say that because the star will eventually become a black hole BUT because they both can cause temporal effects, their effective existence overlaps each other in some ways, so that there are observational/measurement scenarios under which they can be considered the same entity?

If so, we reach, but I'm not sure I understand why you're bringing it up. If not, then I still don't get what you're talking about. Try again a different way, maybe?
 
1. Intense gravity

You call that intense? UY Scuti, with its mere 10 solar masses, doesn't even have enough gravity to prevent itself from being a supergiant at present. It's so big that it's surface gravity is lower than Earth's. It's the polar opposite of a black hole. If this were a black hole, Earth would be a vantablack hole.

Black holes are dense, UY Scuti is sparse. It has a fifth of the density of Earth's atmosphere at an altitude of 82 km. It's less dense than what we consider space. To be a black hole with such immensely tiny density, it will have to compensate by being supermassive. Thousands of solar masses at least, if not millions. 10 would be outside the margin of error in measurement.
 
"Youth is wasted on the young" — attributed to George Bernard Shaw

"Science is wasted on the Science forum" — blamed on Silvercrest
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top