Over a course of 50 minutes this episode punched through the diamond wall of my heart.
Of course not, we came in 7000 years into the whole ordeal. He says as much when he is up on the tower.We may not have come in (as viewers) to the first iteration of these cycles.
When did the Doctor get it back from Missy? In the opening two-parter, obviously, but I can't actually remember the scene where it happens.
When did the Doctor get it back from Missy? In the opening two-parter, obviously, but I can't actually remember the scene where it happens.
Did anyone else think "Bird..... is the word" and Peter Griffen when they saw that in the sand?![]()
Did anyone else think "Bird..... is the word" and Peter Griffen when they saw that in the sand?![]()
And then couldn't stop?
Gripping and stark, but he location made zero sense, unless (IMO) it was all in his head.
Also, where did all the skulls come from?
By the last iteration, there'd be so many he wouldn't be able to see out the windows.
.
The bigger concern is conservation of mass/energy... or the apparent lack of it. Apparently the Confession Dial has sufficient energy/mass to "3D print" 2 billion bodies of The Doctor! That's probably enough mass to cover the surface of the earth with.. half an inch of stuff?
.
The bigger concern is conservation of mass/energy... or the apparent lack of it. Apparently the Confession Dial has sufficient energy/mass to "3D print" 2 billion bodies of The Doctor! That's probably enough mass to cover the surface of the earth with.. half an inch of stuff?
No, the energy to materialize another Doctor came from burning the Doctor's body. It was a recycler/replicator. It would convert the Doctor's body into energy by burning it, then convert the energy back into the Doctor's body.
It's still a problem of conservation of energy. Burning up a Doctor minus the skull provides enough energy to create a new Doctor including the skull.
But... this is Doctor Who. The MST3K mantra applies.
But... this is Doctor Who. The MST3K mantra applies.
For whatever it's worth, the ENTIRE scenario was said to take place within a "closed energy loop," if that means anything.It's still a problem of conservation of energy. Burning up a Doctor minus the skull provides enough energy to create a new Doctor including the skull.
But... this is Doctor Who. The MST3K mantra applies.
Of course, in the real world, conservation of energy would prohibit it. The energy gained from burning the body minus the skull would be less than the energy lost from reconstituting the body with skull plus there would be some energy loss due to inefficiencies since no process is 100% energy efficient. So the process would necessarily lose energy over time.
It is possible that the machine had some huge amount of energy stored and the energy from burning the body was simply to start the process. But there would still be energy lost. Eventually the "battery" would be dead. But if we imagine that the "battery" is a supernova or something, then perhaps it had enough energy stored to last billions of years. It is Time Lord tech after all, where we know that the TARDIS the size of a phone box on the outside can be powered by an exploding star on the inside.
But, ultimately, we have to chalk it up to "it's a Doctor Who episode" so it is not going to make perfect sense.
No, but we see his body (or his hand, at least) vanish when the room resets itself. His skull, however, remains attached to the machine for some reason.
No, but we see his body (or his hand, at least) vanish when the room resets itself. His skull, however, remains attached to the machine for some reason.
Remember the cybermen--he's still alive--no clean-up. All those skulls.
I'd love to make tons of copies of myself--but have each do work in a different field of research--so a version of me could read every book--then somehow--re-integrate.
No 'Hell Bent' discussion page?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.