• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

2387

I expect there will be post-2387 novels eventually (there already are post-Hobus comics and computer games, after all), but the first one would probably come from someone other than me, since I seem to have ended up focusing on earlier centuries lately.

Don't count yourself out, Mr. Bennett. You're also the DTI "showrunner". If anyone's going to have to untie the temporal knots supposedly surrounding the Novelverse, Online-verse, and the Abramsverse, you'd be in the running.

Well, he's explained more than once his position that STO isn't an alternate timeline, just another continuity running alongside Treklit, so probably no untangling of knots with that. :p
 
Yeah, I don't think there are any real knots to untie. STO is a completely separate continuity and the Abramsverse spit off from the Prime Universe/Novelverse.
 
Yeah, I don't think there are any real knots to untie. STO is a completely separate continuity and the Abramsverse spit off from the Prime Universe/Novelverse.

Well, the Abramsverse split off from the Prime universe. The novels, STO, and comics are just different hypothetical extrapolations upon the Prime universe and/or the Abramsverse. The novelverse is no "closer" to the source than STO; they're just independent conjectures, and which one you prefer, if either, is a matter of individual preference.
 
I guess you're right. I have to admit, since I prefer the novels, I tend think of them as the real continuation of the Prime Universe and everything else as alternate universes. I often forget that isn't the official approach.
 
I guess you're right. I have to admit, since I prefer the novels, I tend think of them as the real continuation of the Prime Universe and everything else as alternate universes. I often forget that isn't the official approach.

And that's flattering to us novelists. But I'm sure there are people who prefer to think of the games or the comics as the "real" version instead.
 
I guess you're right. I have to admit, since I prefer the novels, I tend think of them as the real continuation of the Prime Universe and everything else as alternate universes. I often forget that isn't the official approach.

I feel completely the same way that the novels are the real continuation of Trek.
The online game does cherry pick details from the novels, while I'm not aware of anything in the novels originating in the game. Not that that is definitive proof of anything but I think it's an still an interesting observation.
I was disappointed when the Shatner novels definitively split with the main novel range as it's early years I thought it was all one continuity. I still enjoy both as their own thing though.
 
To me "more real" in this context just means "more invested in"; I'm more invested in the novels, thus I enjoy them more (or maybe the other way around, or maybe an overall feedback loop).
 
The online game does cherry pick details from the novels, while I'm not aware of anything in the novels originating in the game. Not that that is definitive proof of anything but I think it's an still an interesting observation.

When the "Path to 2409" stuff started showing up online prior to the release of the game, I got the sense that whoever was assigned to create the backstory probably just drew on whatever pre-existing sources were available to fill in the stuff that didn't come specifically from the game. They had an assignment to concoct decades' worth of history for a promotional supplement to the game, so the simplest approach was to borrow what was already out there. Maybe it's similar with the book characters and ships that actually appear in the games -- they needed to build a large, open game universe, so they populated it with whatever was already available.

As for the books not borrowing anything from the games, maybe the games just don't have anything suitable. Their time frame is decades ahead of ours, their version of post-Nemesis history is completely different, and a lot of their original ideas pertain to species that the novels have already tackled in an incompatible way, like the Iconians and Species 8472. The novels have drawn on a few things from IDW comics, but generally things from stories that are more or less compatible with the novelverse, like Klingons: Blood Will Tell, as opposed to incompatible things like Byrne's Romulan saga or Braga's Hive.
 
Re: divergent speculations/extrapolations

No, that doesn't work. As I've pointed out before, there are alien races in STO that are portrayed incompatibly to the way the novels portray them. They can't be divergent timelines that share a common history. They're just different licensees' speculative extrapolations beyond canon, and no attempt has been made to reconcile them with each other, even though STO has borrowed some ideas from the novels while disregarding others.


The Narrada is from the Online timeline.
No, it's from the Prime timeline. Online, like the novels and comics, is a conjectural expansion on that timeline.
The Kinshaya are either a nondescript member race of the Typhoon Pact...or they are berserkers, and the scourge of the Klingons.

Guess which version is more interesting. :devil:
 
I dunno, the novelverse version has a lot more nuance and intrigue than "berserkers", though I'm sure they're probably more developed than that one-word description in STO. But I loved the look at the Kinshaya culture in The Struggle Within and I'd love to see more of that.

I guess for me, who cares who a race is a scourge of, I just want to know the workings of their society and day-to-day life. :p
 
Every race in STO is warlike, it seems, because the game developers chose to make it a combat-driven game. I don't see how it's interesting to have one more warlike race in a universe full of warmongering enemies. If you're specifically interested in playing war games, then having one more set of interchangeable mooks to shoot at might hold your attention; but if you're interested in plot and characterization and worldbuilding, then having just one warlike race after another would get old fast.
 
as opposed to incompatible things like Byrne's Romulan saga or Braga's Hive.

Although Hive did include things from the novels, even if it was on the part of the artists. EG, the Titan is of the same design as the novels and in one panel set on the Titan bridge, Tuvok can be seen as can Vale.
 
The trick with continuity is that the graph of "A is in continuity with B" is a directed graph, but not necessarily a tree, or even a DAG. :p
 
To me "more real" in this context just means "more invested in"; I'm more invested in the novels, thus I enjoy them more (or maybe the other way around, or maybe an overall feedback loop).
That is kind of what I meant.
When I think of Trek I tend to think of the shows and the books, and then everything else. I'm not saying that the other stuff is bad or anything, it's just that IMO the books are probably the one other medium that to me feels the most like the shows.
 
That is kind of what I meant.
When I think of Trek I tend to think of the shows and the books, and then everything else. I'm not saying that the other stuff is bad or anything, it's just that IMO the books are probably the one other medium that to me feels the most like the shows.

I reckon that a lot of members of the TrekLit forum feel this way.
 
I'm not saying that the other stuff is bad or anything, it's just that IMO the books are probably the one other medium that to me feels the most like the shows.

I reckon that a lot of members of the TrekLit forum feel this way.

Which stands to reason, since people who weren't fans of Trek lit probably wouldn't hang around a Trek Lit forum. So there's kind of a selection bias going on there. ;) You'd probably get a different perspective from the people who hang out in the Trek Gaming forum.
 
To me "more real" in this context just means "more invested in"; I'm more invested in the novels, thus I enjoy them more (or maybe the other way around, or maybe an overall feedback loop).
That is kind of what I meant.
When I think of Trek I tend to think of the shows and the books, and then everything else. I'm not saying that the other stuff is bad or anything, it's just that IMO the books are probably the one other medium that to me feels the most like the shows.

The novels are definitely a lot less fanwanky than STO is. Other than the Abramsverse, IDW never really developed a continuity with their comics, so it doesn't really feel right to compare them, IMO.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top