• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

time waves, time particles? what is known?

think

Because I think I have to?
Premium Member
Ok I searched the net for information on the time particle, I thought was called an Omicron? but nothing, must be buried or lost?

So what are the useful --- current --- if that means anything when it comes to time physics --- theories about time do we have?

Or can time windows and time boxes bend the spacetime continuum --- or what? I don't need to know this but I am interested in something beyond the new-age / bible quotes? Not that it is not real... It is just not real to me. What do you know and how did you come to know what you know, about time particles or time waves both and other time things... ???

I guess it is time for me to say, help?
 
Time particle? Really.

Is that following the same logic that tells us hot water and cold water comes out of a tap (faucet), more recently chilled water and boiling water from the same tap. It stands to reason that lemonade must also come from a tap?

Nothing in physics, or indeed the universe as it appears to be, suggests the existence of a time particles.

I suspect a Google search would now bring this thread as the top result.

Time particles are not a thing. It's not science.
 
Nice,.. Thanks, when it came up new age, I thought the idea was illegitimate,.. Or fake,..

If anything changes cause I thought gravity waves and graviton things did not exist for some time then they became known,..but we can keep a lookout here for informations ,..on time, ok...
 
So what are the useful --- current --- if that means anything when it comes to time physics --- theories about time do we have?
My theory of time is that the more of it you've experienced the faster it passes you by.

---------------
 
Is time long,.. Or could it be wide, how does it flow with each individual like a blood cell in a vain of blood carrying us to some kind of future that reminds us of the past,..the vain or tree branch end balanced atop a thin red strand ever breaking thru the illusion of itself.

I used to think time was illusion but these days I don't know what to think,..now.
 
Some seek to separate space from time
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/splitting-time-from-space/
http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0060?context=astro-ph.CO

I find neo-newtonian thought charming.

As for chronitons--I don't think they can be real--not in this universe at least.

Although I did imagine them as a neighbor's kid and I dodged falling leaves. We imaged them as time particles and we had to avoid them--in Bridge to Terabithia style play.

Pong was about the only video game available then, out of the arcade--so we had to use our imagination. Imagine that.

Now its all candy crush--with even kids sitting around--each looking at his own little rectangle--when there is a whole world beckoning.
 
Time is the measurable distance that a particle travels in a medium where based upon the interaction between the particle and medium the particle will travel a certain velocity along a path until either the energy of the particle fades and an interaction no longer takes place or that the medium suddenly no longer exists thus changing the state of the particle so that velocity is no longer present.

I think the thought of particles containing time that if the particle is changed then time can be changed to whatever period of history or events that suit a person is consistent with someone scared of the reality of their existence.
 
Time is the measurable distance that a particle travels in a medium where based upon the interaction between the particle and medium the particle will travel a certain velocity along a path until either the energy of the particle fades and an interaction no longer takes place or that the medium suddenly no longer exists thus changing the state of the particle so that velocity is no longer present.

I think the thought of particles containing time that if the particle is changed then time can be changed to whatever period of history or events that suit a person is consistent with someone scared of the reality of their existence.

Nevermind. What can one say that would make sense as a reply?
 
Word salad.

Time is the measurable distance that a particle travels in a medium where based upon the interaction between the particle and medium the particle will travel a certain velocity along a path until either the energy of the particle fades and an interaction no longer takes place or that the medium suddenly no longer exists thus changing the state of the particle so that velocity is no longer present.

I think the thought of particles containing time that if the particle is changed then time can be changed to whatever period of history or events that suit a person is consistent with someone scared of the reality of their existence.

Nevermind. What can one say that would make sense as a reply?

Any Lo-Fat Ranch...?

As to the OP, in my infantile knowledge of any field that comes close to studying these phenomena of time and space and distance and such, it is difficult to process that there is a measurable difference between the distance of a star to an observation point as measured by some discrete system (spectrography, triangulation brightness/color) versus the distance of a star when gravity and its influence on celestial bodies is taken into account. If I understand correctly, two very legitimate and 'accurate" measurements can be taken, and two completely different, "correct" answers can be found.

:wtf: :alienblush: :eek:
 
Time is the measurable distance that a particle travels in a medium where based upon the interaction between the particle and medium the particle will travel a certain velocity along a path until either the energy of the particle fades and an interaction no longer takes place or that the medium suddenly no longer exists thus changing the state of the particle so that velocity is no longer present.

I think the thought of particles containing time that if the particle is changed then time can be changed to whatever period of history or events that suit a person is consistent with someone scared of the reality of their existence.

Nevermind. What can one say that would make sense as a reply?

That had to come from random-word paragraph generator failing the Turing Test.
 
this is for now something as well.

Time is the measurable distance that a particle travels in a medium where based upon the interaction between the particle and medium the particle will travel a certain velocity along a path until either the energy of the particle fades and an interaction no longer takes place or that the medium suddenly no longer exists thus changing the state of the particle so that velocity is no longer present.

I think the thought of particles containing time that if the particle is changed then time can be changed to whatever period of history or events that suit a person is consistent with someone scared of the reality of their existence.

induction logics..

in stable realities existence is like water. but in dynamic or trinamic non-parallel reality constructs there is the M-Brain or the N-space feed-through of time limits.

not that illusions can't or can be particle elemented but in the essence of thought - given the simple definition of thinking it - creates it - in one of the multiple quantums of neo-real reality existences ... but I have digressed into some other universe other then the given one ,,,, 1

on to the moving issues of the accelerations of accelerated movement... going with the fact that velocity has.. a single power of time where as acceleration has time squared.. given here on planet three of the sol system as we know it and are at it.

the change in acceleration or maybe the velocity of acceleration is then a third order --- I would go maybe to a 12th order of powers of time but then most motion is irrelevant to where we are going with this.. Maybe.(some alternate membrane of the fabric of time/space and such.)

as I wonder within the known world of mere velocity and accelerations of the s^1 and the s^2 respectively the word salad comes to life at the variable limit of naught null --- and nowheres

moving on goes no place but 000 say on to the next null set of infinite accelerations in changes where... into the void is more on then onto the rationals of value... it is reason that lacks any thought in my mind.

but not reason alone such rational reason has no real nor un-real definition correlation or correspondence to anything .. at all... either mapping nor topological transmutations beyond physical mental or temporal values... If there were value left.?

to summarize as in the bottom line :

We are getting nowhere very fast by just sitting here ... right now. :)

force does equal mass times acceleration but what order of acceleration can we go to for the mass to be negligible or not?

i had always considered time as a half life of carbon 14... to measure the timestamp that something exists for and as. or what? the length of movement ,,, there is no unit values to distance really? or is the unit of movement the light year... where we get out the yard stick --- the size of a thumb joint. or the size of ones foot --- but only when that foot belongs the someone who is a king or what? no there are no unit measures that have not been tainted by man... in some way shape or form.?

OK? == word salad at the second helping there of.
 
I don't know about time particles--but maybe we can have glueballs--particles of pure nuclear force
http://www.gizmag.com/meson-f01710-glueball-particle/39866/

You can have Q-balls, perhaps more
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-ball
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_matter
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/N/negative_mass_propulsion.html

There may even be evidence of quark matter passing through Earth
http://www.geology.smu.edu/~dpa-www/sqm/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2502755.stm
http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.7177 http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6273

Getting back to Fermi (from another thread) "If I could remember the names of all these particles, I'd be a botanist."
 
The necessary incompleteness of even our formal systems of thought demonstrates that there is no nonshifting foundation on which any system rests. All truths — even those that had seemed so certain as to be immune to the very possibility of revision — are essentially manufactured. Indeed the very notion of the objectively true is a socially constructed myth. Our knowing minds are not embedded in truth. Rather the entire notion of truth is embedded in our minds, which are themselves the unwitting lackeys of organizational forms of influence. - Rebecca Goldstein

Goldstein examines the immutable incompleteness of our understanding of time, which preoccupied both Gödel and Einstein:,...

So why has the study of time and its perception gone to the psychological section in our book collection?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_perception
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top