• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

who was the better Klingon?

who was the better Klingon?

  • Kor

    Votes: 19 35.2%
  • koloth

    Votes: 1 1.9%
  • Kang

    Votes: 9 16.7%
  • Kras

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kruge

    Votes: 6 11.1%
  • Maltz

    Votes: 1 1.9%
  • Torg

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • the Ambassador

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Klaa

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chang

    Votes: 3 5.6%
  • Kerla

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Gorkon

    Votes: 2 3.7%
  • any of the bozos from the 24th century

    Votes: 13 24.1%

  • Total voters
    54
I would have voted for Martok if I could. Why post this TOS biased poll in the General Trek forum instead of the TOS forum?

I was wondering the same. If this poll is really to determine who the better Klingon is, should it not be up to the voters to decide whether the 24th century Klingons are relevant?
 
I would have voted for Martok if I could. Why post this TOS biased poll in the General Trek forum instead of the TOS forum?

I was wondering the same. If this poll is really to determine who the better Klingon is, should it not be up to the voters to decide whether the 24th century Klingons are relevant?

Most of the Klingons on this list don't belong in TOS either. They would go in the "Star Trek Movies I-X" category.

Kor
 
I must say I have two well three to be honest Worf, Kurn Worf’s brother I believe his was one of the best the real Klingon caught between two worlds and Martok. They for me were the best Klingons. :klingon::klingon:
 
I would have voted for Martok if I could. Why post this TOS biased poll in the General Trek forum instead of the TOS forum?

I was wondering the same. If this poll is really to determine who the better Klingon is, should it not be up to the voters to decide whether the 24th century Klingons are relevant?

Most of the Klingons on this list don't belong in TOS either. They would go in the "Star Trek Movies I-X" category.

Kor

More like Star Trek Movies I-VI. They are TOS movies only.
 
I was wondering the same. If this poll is really to determine who the better Klingon is, should it not be up to the voters to decide whether the 24th century Klingons are relevant?

Most of the Klingons on this list don't belong in TOS either. They would go in the "Star Trek Movies I-X" category.

Kor

More like Star Trek Movies I-VI. They are TOS movies only.

This BBS does not have separate forums for "Movies I-VI" and "Movies VII-X." So those characters would fit in the "Star Trek Movies I-X" forum, not the forum for a TV series that they never appeared in and therefore don't belong in.

Kor
 
Most of the Klingons on this list don't belong in TOS either. They would go in the "Star Trek Movies I-X" category.

Kor

More like Star Trek Movies I-VI. They are TOS movies only.

This BBS does not have separate forums for "Movies I-VI" and "Movies VII-X." So those characters would fit in the "Star Trek Movies I-X" forum, not the forum for a TV series that they never appeared in and therefore don't belong in.

Kor

If the poll had the Duras sisters, I'd agree. Being that it only involves Klingon that dealt with Kirk and company in the 23rd century, it would be fitting to put it in the TOS forum. There are a few threads in there already that cross over to Kirk's movies.
 
Kor - devious, comfortable with violence and reveled in the glory of battle.

Martok would be a close second. Even when he made mistakes there were for good reasons. The scenes with him and Kor were some of the best in DS9 IMO.
 
Kor had class, and not that fancypants Shakespeare class that Chang effected.

His was a dagger like smirking diplomacy that left his enemies weak with respect.
 
What? No Korax?
Damn, I forgot him! he ignited one of TOS best moments.

This BBS does not have separate forums for "Movies I-VI" and "Movies VII-X."
A serious overlook, IMHO.

Martok
Gowron
Woof (microbrain)
etc.

If you like them so much, make a new poll for them. Good luck deciding on the "proper" subforum, given they are from at least two different series.


Your poll actually has an option for 24th century bozo's. That you do not want them included, means you're not gonna get a good feel for what fans think, since a lot of people like those bozo's better. It means you only want 23rd century. You should have posted this in TOS then, not general Trek.

I could be wrong, but the way your poll is setup, come acros to me as TOS Klingons rule, other Klingon drool. Several people have already indicated that this poll should include 24th century Klingons, so there are people out there who feel those are the better.
 
What's the issue with the 24th century 'bozos'?

The 24th century Klingons reminded me mostly of rejects from 80's hair metal bands. I find it tough to take most of them seriously.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top