I heard that if anyone's caught not-casting-Trek-in-a-negative-light, they'll send Alan Rickman round to kick their teeth in and remind them to get a LOT more negative in their light-castings.My problem with it is this: It's really hard to make good Star Trek. Even having a huge budget.. or even a good idea doesn't mean you're going to get Star Trek right. It's easy, however, to make fun of Star Trek, and it's easy to it consistently. I think even those old episodes will be cast in a more negative light and new episodes or movies will have to escape the shadow of the satire in the eyes of the public. It's an awful idea all around for Paramount to squander what was once one of the crown jewels of the studio.
Apparently the suits at Paramount are developing this.
What does this have to do with Star Trek? Everything.
And, in my opinion, none of it is good.
I liked Galaxy Quest.. it came out at a time when Trek could use a little roast. It was great little movie and a healthy satire of the franchise.
But we need Trek to return to TV, not a satire that will inadvertently devalue the 400 episodes already produced in the eyes of the public. This news makes me sick!
I'm more excited about the prospects of a Galaxy Quest TV show than I am a Star Trek TV show.
There is potential here, but only if it gets treated as more than a parody by the studio.
I don't think Paramount can legally do a Trek series, though. It would have to come from CBS. However, because of the common fanbase for GQ and Trek, CBS might see it as Paramount trying to get around its limitations, using GQ as a stand-in for Trek (an IP they acquired by virtue of Paramount swallowing up Dreamworks), and then counter with official Trek. It will be fun to see how this plays out. I think it's win-win, really.
But we need Trek to return to TV...
No, we don't.
Right now I'd rather have Galaxy Quest.
Now, here's a question: (I didn't read all posts, so apologies if it's been already asked)
Which "iteration" of Galaxy Quest would they want to do? The clearly cheesy "Buck Rogers-esque" as depicted in the "80's"? Or the reunion/continuing adventures show from 18 years later?
The iteration that's about Nesmith and the other actors dealing with the Thermians in outer space. You know, like that movie called Galaxy Quest.
Treating it as other than a parody is equivalent to treating peanut butter as chocolate sauce.
But we need Trek to return to TV, not a satire that will inadvertently devalue the 400 episodes already produced in the eyes of the public. This news makes me sick!
I think you missed the point of my question, but your point is well taken.Now, here's a question: (I didn't read all posts, so apologies if it's been already asked)
Which "iteration" of Galaxy Quest would they want to do? The clearly cheesy "Buck Rogers-esque" as depicted in the "80's"? Or the reunion/continuing adventures show from 18 years later?
The iteration that's about Nesmith and the other actors dealing with the Thermians in outer space. You know, like that movie called Galaxy Quest.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.