Not as crazy as it sounds, since that was the entire reason Bobby Drake was created was to recreate the success of the Human Torch.
Who's Bobby?
For some reason i must've been thinking about Iceman/Bobby Drake...
No idea why...
Who's Bobby?
For some reason i must've been thinking about Iceman/Bobby Drake...
No idea why...
A Song Of Ice and Fire.
My appreciation for this one after the first teaser has taken a hit. Now I'm seeing a Star Labs malfunction imitation.
The good news is, I found something in the new teaser interesting, the transformation scene of stretch's arm.
Why they become what they become and why each is different is something I've never been exposed to yet. The prior films didn't address, (or I missed) this so if a great deal of detail about the processes going on in all of them and why each is different is examined in close detail then I may overlook the copy cat impressions the new teaser gave me.[/nerd]
^Not to mention that the "STAR Labs malfunction" origin for metahumans in The Flash is basically a variation on the original Fantastic Four "given random powers by mysterious radiation" origin from 1961. It's also very reminiscent of the White Event from Marvel's New Universe in 1986.
The problem with accusing one recent thing of imitating another recent thing is that both of them probably have much older antecedents.
Gross.baited breath
I think that was a bit retconning and retrofitting.^Not to mention that the "STAR Labs malfunction" origin for metahumans in The Flash is basically a variation on the original Fantastic Four "given random powers by mysterious radiation" origin from 1961. It's also very reminiscent of the White Event from Marvel's New Universe in 1986.
The problem with accusing one recent thing of imitating another recent thing is that both of them probably have much older antecedents.
The Fantastic Four weren't given radnom powers though, their powers fit their personality. The metahumans on the Flash is their version of Smallville's Krytonite freaks.
I think that was a bit retconning and retrofitting.
I think that was a bit retconning and retrofitting.
If that was retconning, it was spot-on retconning.
It may have never been said in the comics, but I'm thinking when they were designing the characters, that's what they were thinking.
Kirby's Challengers of the Unknown are almost the FF without powers.
Exactly. It wasn't retconned, it was incorporated.I think that was a bit retconning and retrofitting.
If that was retconning, it was spot-on retconning.
It may have never been said in the comics, but I'm thinking when they were designing the characters, that's what they were thinking.
Not seeing a difference. Nothing I've read indicate the powers and personalities were related originally. And as I mentioned the powers don't actually line up with the characters personalities Sounds like fan idea that gained traction, especially after fans became pros.Exactly. It wasn't retconned, it was incorporated.I think that was a bit retconning and retrofitting.
If that was retconning, it was spot-on retconning.
It may have never been said in the comics, but I'm thinking when they were designing the characters, that's what they were thinking.
Not seeing a difference. Nothing I've read indicate the powers and personalities were related originally. And as I mentioned the powers don't actually line up with the characters personalities Sounds like fan idea that gained traction, especially after fans became pros.Exactly. It wasn't retconned, it was incorporated.If that was retconning, it was spot-on retconning.
It may have never been said in the comics, but I'm thinking when they were designing the characters, that's what they were thinking.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.