Good point about patents, hadn't thought of it. If we assume Howard Stark did the legwork of the arc reactor and filed the patents one can also assume that it expired as patents only last 20 years with a max. 5 years extension. My only gripe with this thing is why SI industries doesn't use it on a large scale in all factories because it apparently provides more power than it needs to work, maybe it's very maintenance intensive so it's not commercially viable on a larger scale which may be the reason why other companies are not using it.
It might have something to do with the fact that arc reactor technology is extremely weaponisable. That artificial element alone probably makes refined plutonium look like a lump of carbon by comparison. I think it's understandable that they're taking baby steps getting that technology into general use. Clearly the NY Stark Tower was one such step.
Weapons are but a small use for the element, it is entirely possible that Howard Stark was tryingto replicate the tesseract. And as it pointed out to me recently the new element Tony made in Iron Man 2 might be close to teh tesseract, since Loki was unable to turn his mind.
It might have something to do with the fact that arc reactor technology is extremely weaponisable. That artificial element alone probably makes refined plutonium look like a lump of carbon by comparison. I think it's understandable that they're taking baby steps getting that technology into general use. Clearly the NY Stark Tower was one such step.
Weapons are but a small use for the element, it is entirely possible that Howard Stark was tryingto replicate the tesseract. And as it pointed out to me recently the new element Tony made in Iron Man 2 might be close to teh tesseract, since Loki was unable to turn his mind.
Yeah and there are a number of uses for plutonium too. However, the one that tends to grab people's attention is the one that can flatten cities.
Imagine for a second that every car on the streets is powered by a small fission battery. It would be ludicrously easy for those so inclined to harvest enough material for a dirty bomb with very little expertise required.
Now imagine that element being as ubiquitous. It's several orders of magnitude more energetic and you'd never be able to control it. The only safe way is to have a handful of large, well protected arc reactors to power whole cities.
And yes, it was fairly obvious that the element is mind gem resistant. What's your point?
this feels like really overanalysing a snarky characters quipping.
When Stark built the arc reactor in the desert he was a slave.
That would void his citizenship as well as his power of attorney.
The men that owned him, at that point were the true owners of modern ARC technology, not the US Government who's contract with Stark had lapsed after his dehumanization and disenfranchisement.
Weapons are but a small use for the element, it is entirely possible that Howard Stark was tryingto replicate the tesseract. And as it pointed out to me recently the new element Tony made in Iron Man 2 might be close to teh tesseract, since Loki was unable to turn his mind.
Yeah and there are a number of uses for plutonium too. However, the one that tends to grab people's attention is the one that can flatten cities.
Imagine for a second that every car on the streets is powered by a small fission battery. It would be ludicrously easy for those so inclined to harvest enough material for a dirty bomb with very little expertise required.
Now imagine that element being as ubiquitous. It's several orders of magnitude more energetic and you'd never be able to control it. The only safe way is to have a handful of large, well protected arc reactors to power whole cities.
And yes, it was fairly obvious that the element is mind gem resistant. What's your point?
Only SHIELD and Hyra were intent on using the tesseract to make weapons, it's pretty clear that Howard Stark had another purpose in mind for it. He did turn in Vanko for trying to use the arc reactor technology to make money. And from Fury's remarks Stark was only interested in using the reactor for energy purposes.
One gem doesn't appear to be able to override another one, that was one of my points. There is another use for the gems and I guess you'll have to wait for the Infinity War two parter to see just what they can do together. Imagine using them in union to whipe out half of all life in the universe.
this feels like really overanalysing a snarky characters quipping.
Welcome to Nerd Central where it is par for the course to discuss such things for several pages![]()
Yeah and there are a number of uses for plutonium too. However, the one that tends to grab people's attention is the one that can flatten cities.
Imagine for a second that every car on the streets is powered by a small fission battery. It would be ludicrously easy for those so inclined to harvest enough material for a dirty bomb with very little expertise required.
Now imagine that element being as ubiquitous. It's several orders of magnitude more energetic and you'd never be able to control it. The only safe way is to have a handful of large, well protected arc reactors to power whole cities.
And yes, it was fairly obvious that the element is mind gem resistant. What's your point?
Only SHIELD and Hyra were intent on using the tesseract to make weapons, it's pretty clear that Howard Stark had another purpose in mind for it. He did turn in Vanko for trying to use the arc reactor technology to make money. And from Fury's remarks Stark was only interested in using the reactor for energy purposes.
One gem doesn't appear to be able to override another one, that was one of my points. There is another use for the gems and I guess you'll have to wait for the Infinity War two parter to see just what they can do together. Imagine using them in union to whipe out half of all life in the universe.
That might have something to do with the fact that SHIELD and Hydra were the only ones (on Earth) that knew the tesseract even existed. Still none of that matters because you're missing the point. It doesn't matter what other uses the material may have (really, it only has one: high energy generation) so long as one of those uses is "WMD" it's not the kind of thing you want to be readily available.
this feels like really overanalysing a snarky characters quipping.
Welcome to Nerd Central where it is par for the course to discuss such things for several pages![]()
We never beat a topic to death here. We tortue it alive for eternity.
This is where topics come to burn, forever.
And yes, Vanko had access to his fathers copy of the miniture arc reactor schematics as the opening credits established, but his version was poor compared to Tony's.
Tony told him, while in jail thinking he was there to stay, to add "phased plasma channels and double the rotations", which Vanko thanked him for in the phone call with the two guards dangling dead behind him, as if that didn't help anyone remember.
So yes, they still had crude mass produced Paladium arc reactors, but since no one was inside, he used as crude but effective a mechanical version as he could, and a good one inside his own Whiplash armour.
All of them self destructed and he likely booby trapped his computer systems, since even the best Hammer tech was "shit" compared to his skill, and he could reprogram War Machine.
Honestly, the dialogue is there for a reason folks.
Vanko's suit and the drones didn't apear to be have repulsors to me. They were either energy weapons or machine guns/missile launchers of some sort.
"Repulsor" is an EM cone of excited air propelled by constant supply of high energy conduction to a suitable expellent pad.
Vanko was nearly or as smart as Tony, it's the least complicated part of the process, Obi was able to come up with it on his own as the Mark I seemed to be chemical propellent only.
And Stark was okay with lending it to the Insight Class carrriers without much thought, so it's low on the order of genious level inventions and ability to aquire.
Oh, and most importantly of all Vanko was given the Mark II War Machine armour by Hammer to back engineer, he could have, you know, ran up basic copies too.
Vanko's suit and the drones didn't apear to be have repulsors to me. They were either energy weapons or machine guns/missile launchers of some sort.
Tony's suits fly by way of repulsors, as equipped in the Jericho missiles. The drones and Vanko's suit couldn't carry enough rocket fuel to fly as far as they did, so ... ?
Vanko's suit and the drones didn't apear to be have repulsors to me. They were either energy weapons or machine guns/missile launchers of some sort.
Tony's suits fly by way of repulsors, as equipped in the Jericho missiles. The drones and Vanko's suit couldn't carry enough rocket fuel to fly as far as they did, so ... ?
No, the repulsors are merely stabilisers if you reember his first attempt at flight in his lab he smashed himslf against a wall. He even told Pepper later on in the movie the gloves were stabilisers.
(and i seriously doubt SI would license this tech to its top competitor).
(and i seriously doubt SI would license this tech to its top competitor).
And yet in the comic book Stane did just that when took over SI, that led to the two Armor Wars.
Tony's suits fly by way of repulsors, as equipped in the Jericho missiles. The drones and Vanko's suit couldn't carry enough rocket fuel to fly as far as they did, so ... ?
No, the repulsors are merely stabilisers if you reember his first attempt at flight in his lab he smashed himslf against a wall. He even told Pepper later on in the movie the gloves were stabilisers.
Uhm.. no. The suits fly also by repulsor technology, it's just that they are constantly active to provide thrust whereas the hand repulsors work as stabilizers and double up as weapons.
There is not a single chemical fuel currently in existence or even alluded to in the movies that could propel the suit as it does in the movies, not without major fuel tanks.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.