It looks like this episode rates rather high.
It should, being the best episode that ever was!
I wouldn't go that far.
It looks like this episode rates rather high.
It should, being the best episode that ever was!
It looks like this episode rates rather high.
It should, being the best episode that ever was!
I wouldn't go that far.
It should, being the best episode that ever was!
I wouldn't go that far.
Balance of Terror's got it beat by a nose...
I wouldn't go that far.
Balance of Terror's got it beat by a nose...
Hey, maybe it's time for a new poll.![]()
It should, being the best episode that ever was!
I wouldn't go that far.
Balance of Terror's got it beat by a nose...
Is this the most ten-ful episode so far, by percentage of votes cast?
I wouldn't go that far.
Balance of Terror's got it beat by a nose...
I don't think so.
In Episode of the Week : Balance of Terror by Botany Bay, it's only 47.92% votes for 10.
"The Doomsday Machine" has 72.34% votes for 10. It's not even close. The question was:
Is this the most ten-ful episode so far, by percentage of votes cast?
Is that what you would use your one and only opportunity to travel back in time for?Despite my love for COTEOF, if I could travel back in time for one night to watch the first run of any TOS episode on WJAR channel 10 (my local NBC affiliate both now and in the late 1960's) on a big old Zenith color set, it would be The Doomsday Machine.
So, let's set wayback machine for October 20th, 1967...
Is that what you would use your one and only opportunity to travel back in time for?Despite my love for COTEOF, if I could travel back in time for one night to watch the first run of any TOS episode on WJAR channel 10 (my local NBC affiliate both now and in the late 1960's) on a big old Zenith color set, it would be The Doomsday Machine.
So, let's set wayback machine for October 20th, 1967...
Is that what you would use your one and only opportunity to travel back in time for?
Yeah, my first thoughts are to warn my sister away from the idiot she married, and myself away from that bitch from hell girlfriend.
Not if he brought proofs with him... He can record both of them, him at his apex of idiocy, her making a show of bitchiness.Is that what you would use your one and only opportunity to travel back in time for?
Yeah, my first thoughts are to warn my sister away from the idiot she married, and myself away from that bitch from hell girlfriend.
Sorry I messed up the quote to shorten it.
You would fail because you and she wouldn't believe it at the time and then you would want to keep to the original course because of your warning.
This could be it's own thread.
Not if he brought proofs with him... He can record both of them, him at his apex of idiocy, her making a show of bitchiness.Is that what you would use your one and only opportunity to travel back in time for?
Yeah, my first thoughts are to warn my sister away from the idiot she married, and myself away from that bitch from hell girlfriend.
Sorry I messed up the quote to shorten it.
You would fail because you and she wouldn't believe it at the time and then you would want to keep to the original course because of your warning.
This could be it's own thread.
Not if he brought proofs with him... He can record both of them, him at his apex of idiocy, her making a show of bitchiness.Sorry I messed up the quote to shorten it.
You would fail because you and she wouldn't believe it at the time and then you would want to keep to the original course because of your warning.
This could be it's own thread.
Proofs, proofs, again with the proofs.
KirkFan, Marsden is trying to point out you've constructed a classic "grandfather paradox". You travel backwards in time to "correct" or "improve" a condition, but in doing so, you negate the very reason for traveling back in time.
Sincerely,
Bill
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.