• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Nichelle Nichols' latest spin re MLK

........."MLK personally pulled me off the airliner and told me, 'If you star on broadway you will be seen by thousands but on TV you will be seen by millions!"......

And just 10 minutes later, as it was climbing to altitude after takeoff, the plane exploded.
[cue the 'Twilight Zone' music ]
 
The fact of the matter is Trek is she had/has, will ever have had, and she just can't accept that.

If she lives another 10 years god knows where this will end.

"MLK personally pulled me off the airliner and told me, 'If you star on broadway you will be seen by thousands but on TV you will be seen by millions!'---He then called Gene in person and asked that my resignation from Star Trek be disregarded."

Ugh.

Then I was with him the day he was killed in Memphis, I heard the shot and tried to use myself as a human shield to take the bullet but was too late. Then I unholstered my .357 Magnum and fired in the direction of the shooter until my clip was empty. Then I chased the sniper on foot for 10 blocks, running through people's houses, across busy streets until I almost caught him but an old ankle injury I suffered on Star Trek popped and I fell just as I was about to take him down.......
 
Nichols needs to stop. We live in a world of recorded history and instant fact-checking, so she must know her MLK stories are easily exposed as BS--terribly opportunistic as she drags MLK through the mud of her own self promotion.

Why should she? There are many people lying about far more serious issues and getting away with it. And I don't mean Lyin' Brian.

I'm with bbailey861 and wish her nothing but the best.
 
She's over 80 years old. I think at this point she can tell the story any way she'd damn well please.

Damn straight. At this point, it doesn't really matter and it does no harm.

she must know her MLK stories are easily exposed.
I'm not so sure she's as aware as you might expect. As a big fan, I was excited to see Nichols at a con last August, but I'm afraid to admit that she didn't seem all there. Her fellow actors on stage were covering for her a lot. I fear her age might be catching up to her.

I think that you have hit the nail on the head. At 82, I am sure some things are getting blurry and it's only going to get worse. Has she told the story so many times for so long that she believes them herself? Probably, but at this point, I don't care, and wish her nothing but the best.
Yes, this is being quietly and reverently whispered at this time; she is beginning to slowly leave us. I have no issue with variations on her story at this late date in her life. I also wish her nothing but the best, and if it comes to it, a soft and gentle lift off into tomorrow.
 
You can probably dig up numerous examples of celebrity stories that have changed or evolved over time, a combination of inherently faulty memory and ego.
 
It looks like the "drift" was mostly between Nichols' actual interview and the MeTV copywriter's one-sentence description of it.

The description says that "Martin Luther King, Jr. convinced her to stay on 'Star Trek' when an opportunity to pursue a career on Broadway arose," but what she actually says is "There was once when I was going to leave the show to go to Broadway, which I was born determined to make the theater, and especially Broadway, my goal, where I would star." I don't read that as suggesting that she already had a role lined up.
 
Nichols needs to stop. We live in a world of recorded history and instant fact-checking, so she must know her MLK stories are easily exposed as BS--terribly opportunistic as she drags MLK through the mud of her own self promotion.

The fact of the matter is Trek as she had/has will ever have had and she just can't accept that.

TREK and TRUCK TURNER.

Yes!! Who can forget Dorinda, the foul-mouthed, murder ordering madame, locked in motral conflict with Issac Hayes?!?

Honestly, that was a breakaway role for her, which was as far from Uhura as the moon is from earth. Too bad it did not lead to other strong roles, as she really cut out a memorable character for herself, and proved she was larger than "hailing frequencies open, sir".
I'd never heard of that movie so I looked it up.

Man, that was hard to watch. I spent a lot of years around people who talked like that and it used to just roll off. Now it's really disturbing to hear.

I know, I know, people still talk like that. I just don't hear it all day every day like I used to.
 
It looks like the "drift" was mostly between Nichols' actual interview and the MeTV copywriter's one-sentence description of it.

The description says that "Martin Luther King, Jr. convinced her to stay on 'Star Trek' when an opportunity to pursue a career on Broadway arose," but what she actually says is "There was once when I was going to leave the show to go to Broadway, which I was born determined to make the theater, and especially Broadway, my goal, where I would star." I don't read that as suggesting that she already had a role lined up.

This. :techman: It perfectly lines up with her previous statements about wanting to leave Star Trek to continue pursuing her musical career. I think the fault lies with whoever wrote the by-line accidentally attributing quotes to her that aren't true.
 
She's over 80 years old. I think at this point she can tell the story any way she'd damn well please.

Damn straight. At this point, it doesn't really matter and it does no harm.

I'm not so sure she's as aware as you might expect. As a big fan, I was excited to see Nichols at a con last August, but I'm afraid to admit that she didn't seem all there. Her fellow actors on stage were covering for her a lot. I fear her age might be catching up to her.

I think that you have hit the nail on the head. At 82, I am sure some things are getting blurry and it's only going to get worse. Has she told the story so many times for so long that she believes them herself? Probably, but at this point, I don't care, and wish her nothing but the best.
Yes, this is being quietly and reverently whispered at this time; she is beginning to slowly leave us. I have no issue with variations on her story at this late date in her life. I also wish her nothing but the best, and if it comes to it, a soft and gentle lift off into tomorrow.
I hope it's gentle and quick... Not a slow and painful one.
 
She's also getting older and her recall might be affected.

True, she seemed to be unaware that her personal assistant was a hop-head when he was busted for smuggling drugs in HER luggage.

When did this happen (and are there any links?)

Nichols needs to stop. We live in a world of recorded history and instant fact-checking, so she must know her MLK stories are easily exposed as BS--terribly opportunistic as she drags MLK through the mud of her own self promotion.
I'm not so sure she's as aware as you might expect. As a big fan, I was excited to see Nichols at a con last August, but I'm afraid to admit that she didn't seem all there. Her fellow actors on stage were covering for her a lot. I fear her age might be catching up to her.

This whole deal sounds like what happened to Rita Hayworth in her later years; being constantly asked to appear even though her memory is fading and what she remembers sounds impossible. As somebody said about what was happening to Hayworth vis-a-vis these appearances, 'Well, that's Hollywood. They'll drain the blood out of you, if they can.' I think that the same thing is happening to Ms. Nichols.

At any rate, I hope that this puts the kibosh on an appearance in the next movie for her and the others.
 
Last edited:
If it's the foggy that condemns her to slow deterioration... I'd rather see things end quickly. My mom has been so condemned and that way of leaving is anything but gentle.
 
We've gone from, she a fibber, to she's senile and probably will be dead soon, pretty quick!

Personally I'd prefer she was a liar and lives another 10 years to she's senile and I hope she's passes quickly.
 
1) Do I think she embellished the MLK story over the years? Yes.

2) At 82, do I think she's intentionally lying about it? Not anymore or any less then she has been all these years previously.

My mother is 81; and I can tell you, yes, the memory starts to go, and get foggy (and no that DOESN'T equal senility.) Also, (and I spoke with my mom directly because shes been through some rough times medically recently, but does like to joke about it sometimes) and she said to me - Hey, when you get this old, you know there'll probably be a day soon where you will go to sleep and won't wake up; and you make peace with that and it's okay. It's life.

Honestly most of the time when I interact and talk with my mom (I call a few times a month); she's still pretty mentally sharp.

My point: Even were Ms. Nichols to see and read this, I'm sure she knows her age and what that all entails. Personally, it's good to know she still has the energy to do the occasional Convention and ME TV promo.
 
I am fascinated by the way the story grows in the retelling.

I've been trying to properly source Nichols' various versions of the story. Does anybody have any particularly early (and modest) examples, like that chat show where she offered it as conjecture?
 
Nothing in the most recent interview contradicts what she wrote in her autobiography 20 years ago. The autobiography doesn't say that her next move would have been trying to make it on Broadway, but given her pre-Trek background, it would have been a logical move.

The King story doesn't happen to feature in any of my usual go-to books, the GR-authorized "The Making of Star Trek," the unauthorized "Gene Roddenberry: The Myth and the Man Behind Star Trek," or Solow and Justman's "Inside Star Trek."
 
Nichols needs to stop. We live in a world of recorded history and instant fact-checking, so she must know her MLK stories are easily exposed as BS--terribly opportunistic as she drags MLK through the mud of her own self promotion.

Why should she? There are many people lying about far more serious issues and getting away with it. And I don't mean Lyin' Brian.

For the reason mentioned above: this is not the early 70s, where she, Roddenberry & Doohan could spin largely BS stories on the convention circuit and watch as fresh-minded ST fans lapped it up. History has debunked almost every TOS myth ever created--including her 700,000 acts of re-imagining the MLK story.

Further, MLK literally laid his life on the line for a great cause bigger than himself, or any other individual, so I find it the height of self-serving behavior for N.N. to continue to tie her acting career to the man, as though he placed such value on her presence on a series. Hell, Bill Cosby was already on I Spy a year earlier, which--considering the idea of a black agent in the very white world of 1960s filmed espionage (and at the height of the real life Cold War) was just as--if not more significant.

Her fans can defend her as much as they like, but when all is said and done, not one biography will be free of the fact she's used the life and legacy of MLK to piggyback her endless reimaginings of the now highly questionable story.
 
Yup, I'm in line with the above post by ZapBrannigan, though this thread is an interesting read.

But why I replied really was to give a shout out to the witty reply by Poltargyst that took me by surprise and had me laughing out loud:

"Did she tell you how important it was for you to act in Star Trek?" :guffaw:

Cracked me up.
:rommie:
 
Hell, Bill Cosby was already on I Spy a year earlier, which--considering the idea of a black agent in the very white world of 1960s filmed espionage (and at the height of the real life Cold War) was just as--if not more significant.
Definitely more significant...he was the co-star of a major prime time series. She was a recurring supporting character.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top