I have read it last year and I don´t regret it.
I've always been a little shocked that the IKS Gorkon books didn't sell better. I would have thought that as popular as Klingons seemed to be during the shows' runs that the books would have been big sellers.
I have read it last year and I don´t regret it.
That sounds like praise a Klingon would give. :-)
In short, I would think the Klingons would have great medicine rather than the opposite as you'd think they'd want to get their soldiers patched up quickly to send back in the field. Even orcs have great medicine in the Peter Jackson films as while they're cannon fodder, you don't want to waste a good tool and I wonder how many Klingons would want to live as invalids.
I love plots about reforming cultures to be better but I never actually thought the Klingons were going to be bad at science or medicine. As one friend of me said, "The trick to playing Klingons is they're not stupid. They just act that way." I generally follow the view their blood knight philosophy ends generally whenever when it would make victory harder.
I think that's the issue, really; they're really good at patching up, but they were generally uninterested in medical technology beyond that. Their combat medics are probably great at getting someone in a position where they can get back into the fight with a quick turnaround time, it's anything more than that, it's noncombat medicine, that they were uninterested in.
The general domination of the warrior caste is probably also a huge factor; when being in the field and not being a warrior is seen as so shameful, you're going to have a general dearth of people becoming doctors in the field. Even though other facets of society are necessary to support the warriors, that support still isn't near as well-respected by a lot of their society because it's not directly being a warrior. It's like teachers in the US: they're important and necessary for society as a whole, and we highly view quite a few jobs that require someone to be well-educated - doctors, nurses, scientists, engineers, architects. And yet it's not seen as an innately respectable profession by vast swathes of society either explicitly (sneering at teachers for being demanding, the general distaste for the teacher's union, etc.) or implicitly (low pay, little governmental support, etc.), and so despite how much society respects those positions that require education, we have much fewer people interested in becoming teachers because they themselves aren't among those highly-respected jobs. Societies are just sometimes hypocritical like that.
Well, as recent real-world events have shown, even if people in general aren't stupid, it's possible for them to end up being governed by extremely stupid people who enforce extremely stupid and counterproductive policies. The Klingon political system puts people in authority based on whether they can win a fight or whether their ancestors were rich and important. That's not exactly a system that's likely to put competent, educated decision-makers in charge. In fact, I'd say it's pretty much guaranteed to put stubborn, inflexible idiots in charge, people who would do things like discouraging medical research that didn't fit their ideologies about strength and weakness. After all, we in the US have a government that's actively trying to worsen our health care system for the sake of scoring political points and giving billionaires a tax cut. So there's real-world precedent for a society's health care policy being hobbled by stupidity.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.