Fixed that for ya.
Not much variation in their skin color/faces, is there?

Fixed that for ya.
Not much variation in their skin color/faces, is there?
Aside from VOY did any human female take command in ENT or TNG or DS9. I think I can remember Crusher doing night duty in TNG once. And I know there were female captains of other ships.
If it is expensive to store such a vast data set, there would be companies selling this service to the rich, much like the ones that currently sell cryogenic freezer services to the wildly optimistic rich of today.
For the transporter, perhaps. For the transporter operator, not quite that easy: the more "advanced" modifications listed above were accidents beyond the control of the heroes.So selectively editing one part of the pattern while leaving the rest unaltered should be easy for a transporter.
Rendering a gun inert can be done pretty violently; for all we know, the gun will then never fire again.
"It's science patches for the lot of ya!"
All four of those faces resemble Nurse Chapel in her animated form. The details are different, jawlines and freckles and so forth, but the eyes nose and mouth are almost identical, as if drawn from a single model or template. Probably made it easier to animate, as they just have to switch out mouth movements.
Oooooooh! I know how it happened!
CHAPEL: We don't have enough female crew members on board to attack.
UHURA: Just go clone yourself 100 times, Christine. Then we'll attack!
.... well, it's just a plausible as anything else from TAS, isn't it?????
...or TOS, splitting someone into "good" and "evil" halves. The transporter's been magic since the get-go.Oooooooh! I know how it happened!
CHAPEL: We don't have enough female crew members on board to attack.
UHURA: Just go clone yourself 100 times, Christine. Then we'll attack!
.... well, it's just a plausible as anything else from TAS, isn't it?????
That is as plausible as TNG's "Rascals" with the transporter turning people into children...
...or TOS, splitting someone into "good" and "evil" halves. The transporter's been magic since the get-go.Oooooooh! I know how it happened!
CHAPEL: We don't have enough female crew members on board to attack.
UHURA: Just go clone yourself 100 times, Christine. Then we'll attack!
.... well, it's just a plausible as anything else from TAS, isn't it?????
That is as plausible as TNG's "Rascals" with the transporter turning people into children...
...or TOS, splitting someone into "good" and "evil" halves. The transporter's been magic since the get-go.Oooooooh! I know how it happened!
CHAPEL: We don't have enough female crew members on board to attack.
UHURA: Just go clone yourself 100 times, Christine. Then we'll attack!
.... well, it's just a plausible as anything else from TAS, isn't it?????
That is as plausible as TNG's "Rascals" with the transporter turning people into children...
I WANNNNNNNNNAAAA LLLLLLLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVE!
The whole splitting-into-good-and-evil halves thing, though? Come on!...or TOS, splitting someone into "good" and "evil" halves. The transporter's been magic since the get-go.That is as plausible as TNG's "Rascals" with the transporter turning people into children...
I am reminded of Clarke's Third Law:
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
That is to say, from your limited vantage point if the 21st century, the transporter technology probably does appear magical.
The whole splitting-into-good-and-evil halves thing, though? Come on!...or TOS, splitting someone into "good" and "evil" halves. The transporter's been magic since the get-go.
I am reminded of Clarke's Third Law:
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
That is to say, from your limited vantage point if the 21st century, the transporter technology probably does appear magical.
The whole splitting-into-good-and-evil halves thing, though? Come on!I am reminded of Clarke's Third Law:
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
That is to say, from your limited vantage point if the 21st century, the transporter technology probably does appear magical.
You say "come on" to that? The idea of the transporter turning adults into children was patently absurd. The grating part was the usual TNG techno-babble created to justify any of it. I've seen 1940s cartoons with a greater sense of realism than the "Rascals" transported plot.
Aside from VOY did any human female take command in ENT or TNG or DS9. I think I can remember Crusher doing night duty in TNG once. And I know there were female captains of other ships.
Crusher commanded the bridge in "Descent" and "Thine Own Self." Troi also stood a bridge watch at the end of "Thine Own Self," though this was only described, not shown. (She's half-human, so I'm counting her.)
Hoshi Sato commanded the bridge in "Terra Prime."
Limiting it to human females is rather unfair in DS9's case, since it never had a human female as a regular. Kira and Dax were both repeatedly shown in command positions.
The whole splitting-into-good-and-evil halves thing, though? Come on!
Christopher said:CommishSleer said:Lance said:While Uhura taking command is indisputably a real 'punch the air' moment, it must be noted that the circumstances under which she does so are exceptional. It isn't like she assumes command as part of a regular shift... the entire male crew compliment has been incapacitated, and Uhura is simply the ranking female bridge officer.
I remember an urban myth sprung up in the late eighties that Uhura was the fourth in line behind Scotty, based presumably on this episode. But that rather ignores the fact that in more regular circumstances, we've seen Sulu and Chekov take the chair ahead of her. Not to mention the likes of DeSalle and Leslie.
Aside from VOY did any human female take command in ENT or TNG or DS9. I think I can remember Crusher doing night duty in TNG once. And I know there were female captains of other ships.
Limiting it to human females is rather unfair in DS9's case, since it never had a human female as a regular. Kira and Dax were both repeatedly shown in command positions.
...or TOS, splitting someone into "good" and "evil" halves. The transporter's been magic since the get-go.That is as plausible as TNG's "Rascals" with the transporter turning people into children...
I am reminded of Clarke's Third Law:
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
That is to say, from your limited vantage point if the 21st century, the transporter technology probably does appear magical.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.