The Jenny traveling with the Doctor could be from before she met Vastra and it's the Doctor who introduces them. Timey-whimey
Doesn't work, she didn't recognize the TARDIS in A Good Man Goes to War.
The Jenny traveling with the Doctor could be from before she met Vastra and it's the Doctor who introduces them. Timey-whimey
"Close your eyes, Jenny!"The Jenny traveling with the Doctor could be from before she met Vastra and it's the Doctor who introduces them. Timey-whimey
Doesn't work, she didn't recognize the TARDIS in A Good Man Goes to War.
"Close your eyes, Jenny!"The Jenny traveling with the Doctor could be from before she met Vastra and it's the Doctor who introduces them. Timey-whimey
Doesn't work, she didn't recognize the TARDIS in A Good Man Goes to War.
"Every time?"
"In and out!"
That sounds so very wrong![]()
Did Liz ever ride in Bessie?I think another rule covers her.Then what about Liz Shaw, she no trips in the TARDIS yet was a companion for a full season?
I just remember, a while back, when it was debated about Astrid, Katarina, Grace, The Brig and Benton, and a few others, someone pointed at the "2 Seperate TARDIS Trips" rule.
Frazer Hines holds the record for longest running companion, at 117 episodes.
Frazer Hines holds the record for longest running companion, at 117 episodes.
Strange you should mention that--since this new Doctor really needs a Jamie to serve as muscle.
No reason the "muscle" has to be a male.
I think this Doctor will do things that might even shock the War Doctor--at least that is the vibe I'm picking up. He would have had no problem touching those two wires together on Skaro.
Really? He was very reluctant to even kill the half-face man. "I'm getting the horrible feeling that I'm going to kill you" doesn't sound like someone who's cold-blooded about these things.
Still, I think Moffat may have gone too far in the other direction by trying to create a mystery about whether the Doctor "crossed a line" by killing the bad guy. He's been reluctantly killing bad guys for 50 years now. Very few of his enemies have survived the encounter, no matter how much the Doctor has felt "There should've been another way." So trying to make it ambiguous all of a sudden didn't really ring true.
Still, I think Moffat may have gone too far in the other direction by trying to create a mystery about whether the Doctor "crossed a line" by killing the bad guy. He's been reluctantly killing bad guys for 50 years now. Very few of his enemies have survived the encounter, no matter how much the Doctor has felt "There should've been another way." So trying to make it ambiguous all of a sudden didn't really ring true.
I think that this will play a role in the season arc. The half-face man ended up with Missy in "Heaven", after all. While I like the little mystery of whether the Doctor pushed him or not (this mystery only works because we know that he's perfectly capable of doing that) it was probably not the main motivation for the ambiguousness. I believe that by the end of the season we'll know what happened.
I hope we don't- it's much more fun having that ambiguousness.
I hope we don't- it's much more fun having that ambiguousness.
Sorry, but I don't see why. As I said, we've seen the Doctor cause the death of his foes on many occasions in the past. Sure, he hasn't enjoyed doing it, but he's still done it pretty routinely. Being coy about it all of a sudden just seems contrived.
Still, I think Moffat may have gone too far in the other direction by trying to create a mystery about whether the Doctor "crossed a line" by killing the bad guy. He's been reluctantly killing bad guys for 50 years now. Very few of his enemies have survived the encounter, no matter how much the Doctor has felt "There should've been another way." So trying to make it ambiguous all of a sudden didn't really ring true.
I think that this will play a role in the season arc. The half-face man ended up with Missy in "Heaven", after all. While I like the little mystery of whether the Doctor pushed him or not (this mystery only works because we know that he's perfectly capable of doing that) it was probably not the main motivation for the ambiguousness. I believe that by the end of the season we'll know what happened.
I hope we don't- it's much more fun having that ambiguousness.
Strange you should mention that--since this new Doctor really needs a Jamie to serve as muscle.
I hope we don't- it's much more fun having that ambiguousness.
Sorry, but I don't see why. As I said, we've seen the Doctor cause the death of his foes on many occasions in the past. Sure, he hasn't enjoyed doing it, but he's still done it pretty routinely. Being coy about it all of a sudden just seems contrived.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.