• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Your Favorite Starfleet Ship Phaser

What's your favorite Starfleet Ship Phaser Effect?

  • ENT: Phase Cannon

    Votes: 2 3.4%
  • TOS: Steady Beam

    Votes: 15 25.9%
  • TWOK: Pulse Beams

    Votes: 11 19.0%
  • TNG/VOY: Steady Beam

    Votes: 17 29.3%
  • DS9: Defiant Pulse Cannons

    Votes: 10 17.2%
  • ST09: Pulse Phasers

    Votes: 3 5.2%

  • Total voters
    58
The Phasers in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan were cool, but man! It's a great thing Kirk is a better marksman than Khan allegedly was. If I were Chekov, I'd be mighty nervous having Kirk blasting that thing right at my ear. :lol:
 
What I get confused about is that in the the very first episode of DS-9 they use the defensive shield with some technobabble to move the station a good distance to the wormhole using only thrusters. It becomes visible during this and we see a sphere surrounding the station. Later with the Klingons and further along the Dominion we see the station under attack. Instead of the shield bubble surrounding the whole structure we have explosions wrapping around parts of the docking ring and pylons and ships flying through the interior space. The shields are still up, the dialog talks about them weakening but they would need to be skin tight around the hull for the SFX to make sense...

The bubble shields were originally invented as a cheap way to depict weapon impacts. As CGI technology moved forward, they were able to show the more visceral bubble-free weapon impacts of DS9's later seasons, where ship hulls were shredded. It doesn't make much sense in-universe, but it certainly looks cooler.
 
I would think that having "Pulse Phasers" would allow the phaser array to recharge quicker, but would lack the punch needed to take down a capital ship (but are good against smaller ships and objects), whereas standard Phasers would have a stronger punch against a capital ship, but the recharge would take longer.
 
There was an idea floated about that what makes a phaser particularly effective is how long it stays in contact with a ship's shield--the longer the phaser contact, the more it wears down the shield. Pulse phasers would seem to operate on the same principle, but makes it harder for a shield to disperse (or deflect) the energy from each rapid-fire hit.
 
There was an idea floated about that what makes a phaser particularly effective is how long it stays in contact with a ship's shield--the longer the phaser contact, the more it wears down the shield. Pulse phasers would seem to operate on the same principle, but makes it harder for a shield to disperse (or deflect) the energy from each rapid-fire hit.

Perhaps in addition, I've read somewhere that the phaser beam's most effective strike is the initial contact between beam and shield. A dozen pulse phaser shots, however, mean a dozen effective strikes.

But with that said, we've seen instances where prolonged, sustained phaser beam blasts do indeed inflict quite a lot of damage. One of my favorite shots in all of Trek is a Cardassian Galor getting shoved to the side by the concussive force of a few phaser blasts from two Galaxies.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top