• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Yes, another TOS Constitution reboot

What is your favorite Enterprise?

  • NX-01

  • 1701

  • 1701-A

  • 1701-B

  • 1701-C

  • 1701-D

  • 1701-E

  • 1701-F

  • 1701 (Kelvin timeline)

  • 1701 (Discovery retcon)

  • 1701-J

  • 1701-A (Kelvin timeline)

  • 1701-G


Results are only viewable after voting.
Another small update, started on the pylons, and got them fused to the nacelle:
fRY4rYI.jpg
 
I am trying to visualize how the intersection the rounded box of the pylon with the cylinder of the nacelle results in the trapezoidal shape we see here... and my brane has gone pfftftffttftftttttt
 
That's my biggest complaint with the JJPrise. Proportions and ratios of the nacelles and engineering hull to the rest of the ship. I find it ironic that all the fan-made ship art in the JJPrise style have much better proportions.

This project is turning out great.

Agreed. Stunning visual effects aside, I didn’t particularly care for for the geometric proportions of the Kelvin Enterprise (and especially the 1701-A).
For what it's worth, I love the JJ Enterprise as a design, but not as the Connie, reboot or not :lol:.
From some perspectives this design has similar proportions. I stuck the nacelles onto the low poly concept model to test it:
osglIiJ.jpg

bVaDNTK.jpg

I'm hoping I won't have to redo the nacelles and make them a little smaller
 
Got a little time to work on the engineering hull. As you can see I'm testing out my sub-d modeling skills. I might go back and redo the nacelles in sub-d (I'll only use it for the main body, that would be a lot of faces)
7Eo2Nje.jpg

aluZt8p.jpg

Yes, as it stands it's all quads
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top