At last I saw Into Darkness! just only yesterday.
Now I can join this board again. What's up?
where are the threads for:
1 -isn't it unethical to capture Khan alive just to harvest his blood (then freeze him)? is that legal in the future?
Maybe I'm just old, but it bothers me movies these days seem to like the HEROES as cold killers. Kirk in ST2009 executed Nero just like "He cant escape now. Fire All weapons!". Shatner's Kirk would never do that. Compare the ending of "Balance of Terror". Other example just so you get the idea is Optimus Prime in Transformers 2: "any last words Decepticon? *boom* shoots him in the face". The heroes of my childhood were more nice.
2- Nimoy's cameo was so useless. And I love Nimoy. So many people got angry by the utter senseless destruction of Vulcan in 2009 and now its the same planet for all purposes and intents, just called New Vulcan instead. Cheap handwave.
3- I used to hate the Enterprise being built on Earth, but the underwater scene and liftoff was awesome. More so than the recover from the dive at the end of the movie.
4- the 3D wasnt great. I read the film was filmed in 2D thne converted. That must be the problem. The last movie I saw in 3D was TRON and that was awesome beyond awesome.
5- Carol Marcus in underwear is HOT. All 3 seconds of it. A true Star Trek Babe.
6- Why Khan, after the 72 torpedoes exploded, thinking all his comrades were dead, decided to hit Starfleet with his ship? what is his problem with Starfleet? He had a problem with Robocop, but he had already killed him. The logic alternative was for him to do like Nero and "fire everything" at the Enterprise. But Nero was lame so that could be a stupid ending for the movie. Khan should rather try to hide and make plans to conquest the galaxy alone than die.
7- Hoorray for casting Robocop as Kirk's father-in-law. When I saw him I thought it would be a short cameo because he was on Enterprise(the series) and he would sign orders and disappear from the movie. But I loved to be wrong.
8 - And the adventure continues
Now I can join this board again. What's up?
where are the threads for:
1 -isn't it unethical to capture Khan alive just to harvest his blood (then freeze him)? is that legal in the future?
Maybe I'm just old, but it bothers me movies these days seem to like the HEROES as cold killers. Kirk in ST2009 executed Nero just like "He cant escape now. Fire All weapons!". Shatner's Kirk would never do that. Compare the ending of "Balance of Terror". Other example just so you get the idea is Optimus Prime in Transformers 2: "any last words Decepticon? *boom* shoots him in the face". The heroes of my childhood were more nice.
2- Nimoy's cameo was so useless. And I love Nimoy. So many people got angry by the utter senseless destruction of Vulcan in 2009 and now its the same planet for all purposes and intents, just called New Vulcan instead. Cheap handwave.
3- I used to hate the Enterprise being built on Earth, but the underwater scene and liftoff was awesome. More so than the recover from the dive at the end of the movie.
4- the 3D wasnt great. I read the film was filmed in 2D thne converted. That must be the problem. The last movie I saw in 3D was TRON and that was awesome beyond awesome.
5- Carol Marcus in underwear is HOT. All 3 seconds of it. A true Star Trek Babe.
6- Why Khan, after the 72 torpedoes exploded, thinking all his comrades were dead, decided to hit Starfleet with his ship? what is his problem with Starfleet? He had a problem with Robocop, but he had already killed him. The logic alternative was for him to do like Nero and "fire everything" at the Enterprise. But Nero was lame so that could be a stupid ending for the movie. Khan should rather try to hide and make plans to conquest the galaxy alone than die.
7- Hoorray for casting Robocop as Kirk's father-in-law. When I saw him I thought it would be a short cameo because he was on Enterprise(the series) and he would sign orders and disappear from the movie. But I loved to be wrong.
8 - And the adventure continues