What's everyone's take on the badminton match fixing
Sharp practice, but IMO acceptable. Fault of the format, really.
It's certainly not cricket, of course, so I don't criticise the officials for using their leeway in interpreting the rules to disqualify the athletes. But on another day (or if the athletes been a little less blatant) they'd have got away with it, so I can't really criticise them much either.
This was one of those strategic moves you know is shaded in grey and therefore open to harsh interpretation. If you do it and then get clipped by officials, you have to face the music. If the officials don't pay attention, you get an advantage. Up to the individual to decide whether to risk it or not.
On the subject of the medal table, I appreciate Gold is worth more, but it still seems silly to see South Africa with three medals ahead of Japan with 17! Surely they could give 3 pts for a Gold, 2 for a silver and 1 for a bronze or something?
The whole ranking table is just a bit of fun for the media and public to play around with. There's no canon way to do it IIRC (as someone else said upthread, it's a pretty non-Olympic concept if you think about it), so feel free to rank them however you like.
For example, I like ranking them whichever way GB looks better.
I learned something new yesterday.. I had absolutely NO idea that athletes from some countries get paid for their medals..
The US team members get 25k, 15k and 10k respectively for gold, silver and bronze. Countries like Russia and Italy pay even more.
Again, only IIRC, but I think the bounty on medals reaches six figures for some countries.
In a somewhat related note, I read that the gold medals are worth upward of $600+, Silver in excess of $300 and bronze... Well the bronze medals are worth about 5 bucks.. Seriously??
It's a beautiful demonstration of economic theory in action. The monetary value of an object is not determined through the value of its component parts but rather through supply and demand for the object itself. In this case, you cannot obtain the real winners ones without extreme competition (and the competitive process itself adds value) therefore their monetary value if resold would far exceed those figures.
... a totally incomprehensible rule...
I actually still don't understand what the rule was.
I'm beginning to think that Phelps is part-fish.
See, I said upthread that we should allow genetic modification...
