One of the DVDs actually included a 'death of Xander Cage' mini-movie. To save you the time of watching it (unless you want to do so for comedy value), it's a colossal FUCK YOU! by the studio to Vin Diesel, featuring a body double whose face is never seen and whose only dialogue is a line dubbed from the first movie being literally blown to pieces in as cartoonishly graphic a manner as they could get away with.I wonder if they'll actually bother to explain the reports that he had been killed in the second one.
Fans of Riddick, stand by. If Xander can do what Dom did then the hat trick can be completed.
Fans of Riddick, stand by. If Xander can do what Dom did then the hat trick can be completed.
Actually a 3rd Riddick is already on the way. Twohy was writing the script last I heard a few months ago.
I wasn't too interested in seeing the second movie, but I did see it eventually and I enjoyed it. No Vin Diesel star power, but it was a good ride. As for pretending it didn't happen, I think that's a terrible idea. I hate the whole idea of ignoring previous installments in general. I don't see a problem with them coming up with some sort of "he didn't die" explanation.why not just say that the second movie didnt happen, ive seen it, I dont think anyone would miss it if it was no longer canon, it makes it much easier for the new movie as they dont have to worry about that line about Xander being dead
Fans of Riddick, stand by. If Xander can do what Dom did then the hat trick can be completed.
Actually a 3rd Riddick is already on the way. Twohy was writing the script last I heard a few months ago.
Is that fairly new news? Due to F&F?
Agreed. Personally the only time I have bought Vin Diesel as an actor is as Riddick. All his other movies I found his acting teeth bearingly bad. I would much rather see Riddick return than as xXx which is in my top 10 worst movies list.I'd also be totally stoked for another Riddick movie. Pitch Black was excellent. The Chronicles of Riddick was kinda shaky but I thought the ending left things in a very interesting place. (When the movie ended with all of those Necromongers bowing down to Riddick, I thought, "Damn! THIS is the movie I wish I had been watching.")
Actually a 3rd Riddick is already on the way. Twohy was writing the script last I heard a few months ago.
Is that fairly new news? Due to F&F?
I did a little search and found where I had read it.
Vin Diesel talked about it in an interview with Gamespot back in early March. The interview was about The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena game.
He said Twohy was actually finishing the script, not just writing it.
http://www.gamespot.com/news/blogs/...om_act=convert&om_clk=picks&tag=picks;title;1
He was a rising star in the action films genre but failed to make it because the audience of today do not find action movies to be that enjoyable.
There was a time I really liked Vin Diesel and thought he'd be a must-see action star.
Then he made "The Pacifier" and a tore up my Vin Diesel poster and bedsheets, set them on fire, and gave up on the guy.
I really liked "XXX" and the first Fast and the Furious movie and figured this is what Vin is capable of that he'd pretty much be like the 00s' version of the 80s' Bruce Willis.
Then the fucking PACIFIER! Seriously, what was he and/or his agent thinking with THAT paticular career move?
Sure, Arnold Schwarzenegger had a degree of success with "Kindergarten Cop" but, ugh, that was after much more kick-assery.
(And, IMHO, the Riddick movies are only slightly entertaining but otherwise forgetable.)
The latest F&F movie was pretty good only because of his return teaming up with Paul Walker. I'd probably go see a XXX movie with Vin in it too.
Vin? Keep doing hard-core kick-assery action movie. Leave kiddie nonsense cutsey comedy movies to retired football and "professional" wrestling stars.
Some stars make really bad job decisions early in their career. Others think that one or two hit movies will propel them to stardom, but actually doesn't. Vin Diesel is the victim of both those factors. He was a rising star in the action films genre but failed to make it because the audience of today do not find action movies to be that enjoyable.
The 80's and early 90's had great stars - Schwarzenegger, Willis, Stallone and their likes - most audiences loved those kind of action. The movies had some solo hero taking on a gang or even an entire army and live to get the token babe at the end. Today the only 'action' is found in science fiction movies, that's about it. Some movies make it for nostalgia factors such as Die Hard or Rambo, but otherwise the audience today is either too watered or get their fill of action from video games.
And who's to blame? Some video games have better action AND stories than many movies today. When the public gets their fill by being in the action rather than just watch it, why would they go and spend upwards of over 15 dollars to watch a movie? If you don't believe it just try playing up some Halo 2, Crysis and Gears of War. That's why Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson had to shift towards comedy action pieces even though he was being touted as the 'next Schwarzenegger'. The type of action Vin Diesel would go into has no audience anymore.
Statham as the villain, I've never seen him as the bad guy in a film, and I think it would reflect on Vin's "good guy" status.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.