rewatching the episodes on scifi has got me thinking again about the good and bad points regarding the Xindi arc of season 3.
On plus side:
Same old single function aliens. The reptilians and insectoids were "bad" and warlike whereas the primates were "good" and more into science and peaceful activities. There were no surprises here. One of the things that I entirely dislike about trek is the cardboard cutout aliens - most races seem to have one personality type.
I would have much preferred if they had led the audience to believe that the primates were the good guys and then reveal that it was actually the reptilians that were manipulated by the primates/humanoids. Also the fact that they all evolved on the same planet seemed a bit far fetched.
The "bermuda triangle" of space angle was never really expanded upon - it seems as if they didn't really know what to do with the idea.
crew character development was virtually nonexistent. The crew did not change at all in any meaningful way.
T'Pol got addicted but outside the episodes that focused on that story it was hardly an issue.
Archer started to go on a "do whatever it takes" Captain Matthew Gideon route but that was also downplayed as I think the production team that Bakula probably couldn't pull it off (my opinion)
Trip started off wanting revenge but that too did not take over his overall character in any meaningful longstanding way.
The MACOs were also a good idea but it became clear that they were just multi-episode versions of the typical redshirts.
I still enjoyed it i guess but it could have been a really good vehicle to turn everyone's expectations on their ear. Too bad they played it so safe.
On plus side:
- I think it was a good thing that they gave the crew a purpose that spanned the entire season.
- The addition of the MACOs.
Same old single function aliens. The reptilians and insectoids were "bad" and warlike whereas the primates were "good" and more into science and peaceful activities. There were no surprises here. One of the things that I entirely dislike about trek is the cardboard cutout aliens - most races seem to have one personality type.
I would have much preferred if they had led the audience to believe that the primates were the good guys and then reveal that it was actually the reptilians that were manipulated by the primates/humanoids. Also the fact that they all evolved on the same planet seemed a bit far fetched.
The "bermuda triangle" of space angle was never really expanded upon - it seems as if they didn't really know what to do with the idea.
crew character development was virtually nonexistent. The crew did not change at all in any meaningful way.
T'Pol got addicted but outside the episodes that focused on that story it was hardly an issue.
Archer started to go on a "do whatever it takes" Captain Matthew Gideon route but that was also downplayed as I think the production team that Bakula probably couldn't pull it off (my opinion)
Trip started off wanting revenge but that too did not take over his overall character in any meaningful longstanding way.
The MACOs were also a good idea but it became clear that they were just multi-episode versions of the typical redshirts.
I still enjoyed it i guess but it could have been a really good vehicle to turn everyone's expectations on their ear. Too bad they played it so safe.