They're both supposed to be able to use them without any problems, so I don't see why this has to become a messy situation...unless Fox is just being their douchey self.
Two weeks ago:
Joss Whedon: I've got a brother and sister duo I wanna use for Avengers 2. There aren't many brother/sister heroes out there, right? Wink wink!
Today:
Bryan Singer: HEY, WE GOT QUICKSILVER IN THE NEXT X-MEN MOVIE WE'VE BEEN FILMING FOR A MONTH OR SO.
This is the first time this has happened, and there is still time for Fox to blink. If they push forward and allow Singer to include the character, there's a chance they're burning down any future cooperation with Marvel, who have proven themselves to be hard negotiators who aren't afraid to flex whatever muscle they have.
Feige already said that both Marvel Studios and FOX can use the characters, so I'm not seeing what the issue/dispute here is.
^ Still not seeing the issue here, as, again, both studios can legally use the characters; it doesn't matter in what capacity they're used by one studio as opposed to the other.
^^ "A pointless action scene role"? What? We don't even know how Singer is going to use him in the film. Also this is Singer so he's not just going to be using Pietro just because. This isn't the same Fox reigme as it was before since Tom Rothman departed.
^ Well, if you referred to Singer as "Bryan", people might be confused as to who you're talking about. Bryan Fuller? Bryan K. Vaughan? Bryan Cranston? Bryan Adams?
On the other hand, I can't think of another famous "Joss".
Exactly. Same for Nolan. If we were using Chris or Christopher whats to stop someone from going, "wait, boardmember Christopher is involved in 'x' now".^ Well, if you referred to Singer as "Bryan", people might be confused as to who you're talking about. Bryan Fuller? Bryan K. Vaughan? Bryan Cranston? Bryan Adams?
On the other hand, I can't think of another famous "Joss".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.