wwe vs tnt anyone watching?
- Thread starter timothy
- Start date
The champion doesn't have to defend his/her title at every PPV.
No Way Out 2007 for example, the main event featured champion and Wrestlemania challenger from both Raw and Smackdown teaming together against one other in a tag team match.
Last edited:
Also the rematch clause isn't automatic either. We can't always just assume that a rematch will happen. Sometimes it will be pushed off or not happen at all. It is always dictated by story line.
^ Obviously and they will eventually. They need to find him another program first.
Well, I guess the WWE was too damn afraid to not have it's number one star be champion. That really sucks. Not only that, but he will now be in yet another WWE Championship match. I don't remember the stars of the attitude era having this kind of championship consecutive streak.
Not surprised, and remember a couple of months ago I stated that they should complete the push of monster Mark Henry by giving him the title.
It just goes to show that the WWE can book Cena to lose or win the title whenever the hell they want to and screw the fans.
I'm surprised WWE had the balls to put the WHC on Mark Henry. I don't have a problem with the result, he's a reliable worker who has paid his dues and one who has finally found his niche. But just knowing how WWE are with the likes of Orton, made me think that Randy was retaining.
I just don't get what all this "John Cena must be WWE Champion constantly" bollocks that WWE is screwing around with. WWE once had a glowing reputation for making new stars. Now it's pretty much 1996-2001 WCW all over again, because as soon as one person finally makes it to the top, they are thrown back down shortly after in favour of giving John Cena more title reigns.
I mean who knows why this is going on? Maybe it's a part of a bigger storyline, which doesn't make sense given that WWE still maintain a respectable level of kayfabe. It could also be that Cena has expressed a desire to retire in the near future and WWE are hoping to milk the cow for all he's worth. Still, if that was true you would think that they would be trying to build new stars to fill the gap.
I just don't get what all this "John Cena must be WWE Champion constantly" bollocks that WWE is screwing around with. WWE once had a glowing reputation for making new stars. Now it's pretty much 1996-2001 WCW all over again, because as soon as one person finally makes it to the top, they are thrown back down shortly after in favour of giving John Cena more title reigns.
I mean who knows why this is going on? Maybe it's a part of a bigger storyline, which doesn't make sense given that WWE still maintain a respectable level of kayfabe. It could also be that Cena has expressed a desire to retire in the near future and WWE are hoping to milk the cow for all he's worth. Still, if that was true you would think that they would be trying to build new stars to fill the gap.
I'm not watching the ppv right now but from reports I've read it's been kind of dull. I'm still upset the Tag Team match resulted in a DQ. Sounds like Night of Chumps rather than Night of Champions lol.
If Triple H goes over Punk clean without any hints of a turn, then WWE has learned nothing. If I was running that place I'd fire the creative team and start from scratch. It's hard to believe that the same people who pitched incredible storylines at the beginning of the summer could screw them up so badly by the end of it.
^ Which is why I have kept on bitching about them dropping the ball 
Very few people have agreed with me on this in my circle of friends. They like what has been happening. I haven't.
Very few people have agreed with me on this in my circle of friends. They like what has been happening. I haven't.