No, I don't think this comes up again, which is disappointing in many ways. It would have been interesting to follow Worf's recovery a lot farther than it went--the whole thing isn't mentioned again post-Ethics. This could have popped up in a number of different places in TNG or DS9, and, as far as I know, it never did.
Does anyone know if this was the only episode of a Trek series that talked (specifically) about Klingon anatomy? It is one of the only ones I recall.
Not that I recall. One of TNG's lowpoints. I'd take all of season one over this stinker.
One reason I hate that episode is because of the primitive way they portray the Federation's technology in dealing with a back injury.
I would imagine that by the 24th century, complete reconstruction of bone, spinal discs and spinal cord/nerves would be a walk in the park.
Yet they show the technology to be lacking, (moving your legs via remote control?)
We could probably do the remote control thing now, but thankfully, science is working on reconstructing the spinal cord itself, and we may have that capability in the next 20 years.
All these reasons make this episode horribly outdated.
Not that I recall. One of TNG's lowpoints. I'd take all of season one over this stinker.
It seemed reasonably plausible to suggest that the sheer complexity of the synaptic connections at either end of a spinal cord would make it exceptionally difficult to "wire up" a replicated cord compared to a simple limb replacement or something like that. *shrug*
No offense, but it's a very complicated area today.
400 years from now, it's not likely to be especially if stem-cell research lives up to be everything it's proposed to be.
Or Trek TOS for its references to “tapes,” “transistor units” and “printed circuits.” And the invalid Captain Pike being limited to saying “yes” or “no” with a flashing light.Besides, if you're going to complain about how backwards the tech might seem in comparison to today (not when it was filmed), hate the show for their large, clunky computers, Data for his slow processing speeds, PADDs and tricorders that do less than my phone...
Besides, if you're going to complain about how backwards the tech might seem in comparison to today (not when it was filmed), hate the show for their large, clunky computers, Data for his slow processing speeds, PADDs and tricorders that do less than my phone...
It's a show created in our past set in our future. They were just making stuff up having no idea how quickly we'd progress, obviously.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.