So, in other words, they had zero relevance to your beef with Locutus.
Woody Allen: ‘Obama should become dictator’
- Thread starter Dusty Ayres
- Start date
So, in other words, they had zero relevance to your beef with Locutus.
No, just the point I originally made before he got involved and turned this whole thing on to me again.
Locutus says "95%" of the poor behaviour on this board is brought on by posters like myself and John Picard. I cited three examples of poor behaviour that had nothing to do with either of us. So no, it's not odd at all.
It doesn't matter how they were dealt with, it matters only that they happened at all.
The fuck? He told you that 95% of the crap that happens to you you bring on yourself, not that you and John are the only misbehaving malcontenets on here. I'll quote, and not your in-quotes-but-totally-made-up quote:
Do note that the "you," in this case, really does mean you.
It's like you can't read. Or you read, but you can't understand.
^Given the amount of time I have to spend rephrasing everything I say because others refuse to even read it properly, I'm not going waste my time doing the same thing again.
My original point stands. If Locutus thinks I bring these things upon myself then that's just an example of why he shouldn't get so upset when I criticise the staff.
My original point stands. If Locutus thinks I bring these things upon myself then that's just an example of why he shouldn't get so upset when I criticise the staff.
Hate to break this to you, but part of writing on a message board is knowing how to communicate to who you want to, ie the audience. That's why boards have edit buttons to begin with. If your only defense over and over again is "I'm not wrong, it's everyone else," then it reeks of playing the victim card, as opposed to making a priority out of getting the point across.
Like most of your other baseless complaints, that doesn't even make any sense. Just because you frequently draw exactly the response from people you complain about doesn't justify people flaming you, and no one has claimed otherwise or said that the staff shouldn't enforce the rules when they do.
Honestly, you're endless complaints are just tilting at windmills at this point. If you just tried to get along with people and have a good time your problems would go away.
How many posters are there on this board ? A good few thousand regulars at least ?
I get along just fine with 99% of them. I have four people on ignore and maybe four others I would if I could.
That's a lot. Seems like an issue to me. 
I wouldn't have anyone on ignore (and didn't before becoming a mod). If they say something I don't like or don't feel the need to comment on, I can just ignore their post, but I won't shut the person out completely and assume they'll never say anything of value ever again.
Anyhoo, it's been real, it's been fun, but it hasn't been real fun, so I'm just going to drop this now. You may now return to your regularly scheduled silly thread.
I wouldn't have anyone on ignore (and didn't before becoming a mod). If they say something I don't like or don't feel the need to comment on, I can just ignore their post, but I won't shut the person out completely and assume they'll never say anything of value ever again.
Anyhoo, it's been real, it's been fun, but it hasn't been real fun, so I'm just going to drop this now. You may now return to your regularly scheduled silly thread.
If that's true then why isn't he funny?
That's a lot. Seems like an issue to me.
I wouldn't have anyone on ignore (and didn't before becoming a mod). If they say something I don't like or don't feel the need to comment on, I can just ignore their post, but I won't shut the person out completely and assume they'll never say anything of value ever again.
In general, I don't either. Those individuals have had more than enough chances, however, to make my repeated attempts to meet them half-way worthwhile.
ST-One
Vice Admiral
Whoah! They took a wrong turn at TNZ.
He said angriest, not biggest bunch of blubbering vaginas.
+1
I doubt most of them even would know what they were angry about. That would require them to have an opinion of their own rather than just calling each other 'awesome' and seeing who can be the most offensive in a single post.
ST-One
Vice Admiral
Well, I'm allowed to express my reaction to something stupid, am I not?
If you want to. If it makes you feel any better, and I doubt it will, I was not referring to everyone in TNZ and certainly wasn't including you.
ST-One
Vice Admiral
Of course you weren't ...
Whoah! They took a wrong turn at TNZ.
He said angriest, not biggest bunch of blubbering vaginas.
+1
I doubt most of them even would know what they were angry about. That would require them to have an opinion of their own rather than just calling each other 'awesome' and seeing who can be the most offensive in a single post.
Of course you weren't ...
Well, I tried. If you want to see that as an attack on you, someone I have rarely spoken to, then that's up to you.
ST-One
Vice Admiral
Of course you weren't ...
Well, I tried. If you want to see that as an attack on you, someone I have rarely spoken to, then that's up to you.
It was an attack on TNZ and all who post there regularly.
TNZ has never been what those who do not even post there make it out to be.
Maybe, maybe not. I'm not here to argue that point, only that there are a collection of individuals who behave poorly on this board, all of whom are frequent posters on TNZ.
You are free to defend them as others have done if you wish, but I did not and do not include you in that group. There are plenty of posters in TNZ who are no problem at all as well.
Similar threads
