What sketch is this based off?
This one:
![]()
I never saw it in printed form and found it in the titlecard of a Gabe-Koerner-reimagined-Enterprise video.
As we know, designs such as the beloved Big E evolve from such sketches - the artist draws tons of drawings, the director/producer points and says. "I like where this piece is going, develop this some more," and the cycle repeats.
Instead of modeling this schnozz ship faithfully, I wonder what we'd end up with if we pretend Roddenberry had pointed at IT instead of the sketch that ended up as the Big E?
Coolness. More please.
Oh no Sir. Your models are cool... Super cool... Awesome cool. Mine is somewhat okay. I need to learn from a better programme.
But thanks none-the-less. I'm presently working on the shuttle bay, and sensor platforms.
deg
I'm really wondering, where all those bad jokes come from. Over in the schematics thread many ships inspired by this design were posted, and not one joke of that kind was cracked.
Maybe they're used to flying genital designs? I know the Starship Schematics website has some of the most horrendous bodges around, maybe schematics designers are inured to it after looking at such things for long enough? Just because it's a doodle that Matt Jeffries did while trying out ideas does not make it an unassailable work of genius, even he didn't hit a home run every time. It's a flying knob gag.
We should have that as a design challenge, come up with a spheroid ship that doesn't look tacky. Not an easy one.
We should have that as a design challenge, come up with a spheroid ship that doesn't look tacky. Not an easy one.
Why you'd then stick a long, thin body out the end is beyond me, a slight increase in size of the ball would give you that volume. I can only think it's done because a simple ball is not visually interesting or cool looking. The only spherical ship I can think of that was well done would be the Ares moon shuttle in 2001.
Why you'd then stick a long, thin body out the end is beyond me, a slight increase in size of the ball would give you that volume. I can only think it's done because a simple ball is not visually interesting or cool looking. The only spherical ship I can think of that was well done would be the Ares moon shuttle in 2001.
Funny, I always thought that the Discovery had a long boom out the back of the habitation module because the engines were rather dangerous....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.