I don't think it will be used for real actors. They will somehow get in the way of it.
Will AI character such as Tilly Norwood replaces TV shows and movies to AI only and replaces all human actors?
- Thread starter Happy Hopping
- Start date
It will. There's always someone willing to try stuff like that.
The problem is that stupid ideas usually get naturally weeded out because the cost outweighs the potential gains. But with Artificial stuff, the cost is barely anything. Gonna be a lot of full-length slop before too long.
Very easy to not watch it though.
The problem is that stupid ideas usually get naturally weeded out because the cost outweighs the potential gains. But with Artificial stuff, the cost is barely anything. Gonna be a lot of full-length slop before too long.
Very easy to not watch it though.
They won't go to watch something completely artificial that doesn't have a real person in the lead role, that other people don't admire or desire. Movies that use AI only in place of VFX will be watched. But no one wants to watch a movie or TV series that consists entirely of AI actors. Besides, AI is something even a normal person can use, sit down, and talk to. I already have a computer, and I can sit down and chat with something completely artificial. Why would I pay streaming services or "theaters" that much money to watch it?Very easy to not watch it though.
A threat? Are you serious? Its what's happening in the world. I have no desire or reason to make threats about A I. Im not causing A.I. but it but its going to happen regardless if we like it or not. Best to know and understand whats happening. Here you go. Also you should not accuse people of things. Not right.
Surprise! AI News Anchor Hosts UK Channel 4 Special on AI Taking Jobs
The special "Will AI Take My Job?" examines whether AI can outperform trained human beings in several occupations with a big twist
www.thewrap.com
Last edited:
Well, if you're upset, you can have an AI chatbot write an apology letter for you on my behalf. If AI is going to "truly permeate everything," and there's no point stopping it, that should satisfy you, right?
So you're upset that I'm saying A.I. Isn't going away? Youre basically accusing me over that? You're making no sense. I didn't create it and don't use it. Why are you laying it on me?Well, if you're upset, you can have an AI chatbot write an apology letter for you on my behalf. If AI is going to "truly permeate everything," and there's no point stopping it, that should satisfy you, right?
I'm doing you the favor of teaching you now that there are social consequences to denigrating the work of artists by saying AI can meaningfully replace them, so you can fix your thinking and avoid making the same mistake later.
You're welcome.
I never said that once. Where did I say that?
Well, that's a lie.
Right here, sport:
Saying that AI graphics can match the dramatic performance of human actors is "denigrating the work of artists by saying AI can meaningfully replace them."
Uh. I said it would be more perfected and indistinguishable. The technology will advance exponentially with each new generation as technology does. Theres no way we can stop it unless A.I is outlawed in the united states. I didnt say I liked A.I. I certainly did not denigrate anyone. You're seeing what you want to champ. Not sure why. You realize what happened a day or so ago in the world of A.I.?
You can say that you get find more artistry in soap operas than Shakespeare, and you can say you find AI slop as compelling as the work of real actors. You're free to enjoy whatever garbage you like, and consider it treasure. But when attempt an objective statement to the effect that AI garbage matches the work of real artists, you cross the line into denigration of real artists, and you ask for the kind of blowback you'll get.