In the post-Nemesis novels, the Suliban are Federation members and the Xindi are nomads roaming the galaxy.
...Archer...Record keeping was never his strong point anyways given his ship was taken over by the Ferengi and they were still an unknown too. Sure the name wasn't there, but the aliens with the big years and buttheads would've been a relevant enough description.
What use would a description be? Until they meet this species again and establish visual contact (and get the name) its just another unnamed alien. The Ferengi have no reason to hide their appearance from the crew....Archer...Record keeping was never his strong point anyways given his ship was taken over by the Ferengi and they were still an unknown too. Sure the name wasn't there, but the aliens with the big years and buttheads would've been a relevant enough description.
What bothered me about that episode was that they didn't do anything for the viewer, like somehow having the Ferengi "disguised", in effect, via hooded outfits or something. That way, the viewer can say, "Hey, they're Ferengi!", meanwhile the crew has nothing to go on as far as a description. How hard could that have been to do?![]()
Which is the point I've been making for over a decade. Having a picture of the alien only gives you a description. Having a name only gives you that. Until the alien using that name shows his face you've no idea that the "butthead" aliens encountered in the 22nd Century and the aliens who've been calling themselves the "Ferengi", since who know when, are the same species.Even if there was no video or still images, you would think that someone aboard the Enterprise who interacted with the Ferengi could have produced a sketch.
It just accrued to me, after The Last Outpost where Riker and the away team saw the Ferengi, did Starfleet then put two and two together and realize that the species that boarded the Enterprise in the 22nd century were the Ferengi?
^(oo)^
So? They may have a ton of pictures of the buttheads. Doesn't mean they will know they're called "Ferengi". Until they meet someone, show them the picture and that person says "Oh yeah, those guys are the Ferengi." they'll remain unnamed in Starfleet's database.The NX-01 had cameras all over it. Heck ships today do. In Silent Enemy he was able to send a visual transmission from a freaking cargo bay.
That was me and someone corrected me. The vision of an assimilated Earth was while they were traveling through time and not the arrival point which is what had me a bit confused. In my own ignorance, I thought for some reason most of the Earth had been assimilated with Cochrane's camp untouched.To the poster who asked if the Vulcans shouldn't have noticed that Earth was mostly assimilated in FC... the point was that Earth WOULD have been assimilated had the Enterprise NOT gone back and prevented them. As it was, they changed history so the Borg never got the chance - Cochrane's Earth was untouched.
In the post-Nemesis novels, the Suliban are Federation members and the Xindi are nomads roaming the galaxy.
Doesn't mean they will know they're called "Ferengi". Until they meet someone, show them the picture and that person says "Oh yeah, those guys are the Ferengi." they'll remain unnamed in Starfleet's database.
Having "access" to the logs and records and actually being able to read them are two different things. The Ferengi are paranoid SOBs and apparently even Hoshi's magical linguistics skills couldn't break their code.Doesn't mean they will know they're called "Ferengi". Until they meet someone, show them the picture and that person says "Oh yeah, those guys are the Ferengi." they'll remain unnamed in Starfleet's database.
If only there were some way that Archer and company could have had access to the records and logs and data of the Ferengi ship --- say, by overpowering its crew or taking it captive for some time --- then perhaps it would have been possible for them to learn something about their mutton-headed adversaries.
Picard & co. introduced the Borg to the earlier timelines. We saw the timeline before they were introduced earlier...time travel is fun...
They were unknown to Picard and the Enterprise-D crew, not the Federation. The Hansens were studying them 20 years earlier ("Dark Frontier"). And they probably have detailed files from "Regeneration" in 2151.
But everything that happened in First Contact had always happened. Picard, Riker, and the Enterprise-E had always traveled back to 2063 and helped Zephram Cochrane launch the Phoenix. It's a temporal loop. We just didn't know any of that had happened yet because we hadn't reached the "beginning" of the loop in 2373. There is no altered timeline; it's the same timeline it's always been.
I like to occasionally point out that prior to First Contact, the display wall in the Enterprise observation lounge did not include a model of the NX-01 Enterprise, subsequent to FC it did.But everything that happened in First Contact had always happened. Picard, Riker, and the Enterprise-E had always traveled back to 2063 and helped Zephram Cochrane launch the Phoenix. It's a temporal loop.
A member of one of the Xindi races could be a citizen of one of planets that has a membership in the Federation, without any of the Xindi worlds possessing membership.The Xindi are also Federation members. A Xindi Reptilian is the Federation's Secretary of Science and Space Exploration. Or rather was, during TNG's first season. Still, I doubt such a position would go to someone who didn't belong to a Federation member race.
The whole thing makes me wonder what qualifies in Star Trek for creating an alternate reality? I mean, people seem to go back in time, change history and still remain in the same timeline but you have other times, like Nero, who go back in time and change history and create a new universe. How come this doesn't happen with Picard and many other examples throughout the series but happens when Nero goes back in time?But everything that happened in First Contact had always happened. Picard, Riker, and the Enterprise-E had always traveled back to 2063 and helped Zephram Cochrane launch the Phoenix. It's a temporal loop. We just didn't know any of that had happened yet because we hadn't reached the "beginning" of the loop in 2373. There is no altered timeline; it's the same timeline it's always been.
How do we know, though? It's never stated on-screen 'Oh, we must have been a part of the loop all along'. As you said, "we didn't know it yet" does open up the possibility that the variables did in fact change when the Borg went back in time. Maybe originally Cochrane launched the Pehonix just fine with his two original co-pilots and the Borg were never involved at all. Flash forward to the 24th century though, and suddenly there's this variable thrown in there --- the Borg going back in time and, for example, killing Cochrane's two co-pilots in their initial assault on Earth in the 'past' --- and yes, the Enterprise crew technically DO restore events to something resembling their original intent by the end of the movie, and in so doing "restore" a version of the 24th century they knew. But with Riker and Geordi in the co-pilots seats and Borg tech being left behind afterwards (as shown in ENT:Regeneration), we can't be certain those events actually happened in the original timeline, in that exact way. So maybe not everything is exactly the same.
While the token elements remain the same, there is the possibility that the oft-posited theory that the timeline did change slightly has got creedence. There's at least as much evidence in the movie itself to support that theory as there is to support the idea that the Borg and the Enterprise crew had always been there at the Pheonix launch, and that it was all just some kind of temporal loop that was being fulfilled.![]()
But everything that happened in First Contact had always happened. Picard, Riker, and the Enterprise-E had always traveled back to 2063 and helped Zephram Cochrane launch the Phoenix. It's a temporal loop. We just didn't know any of that had happened yet because we hadn't reached the "beginning" of the loop in 2373. There is no altered timeline; it's the same timeline it's always been.
How do we know, though?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.