Starfleet seems to have a policy of only Captain's having long-term command of starships, regardless of size or function.
Out of universe, that's true.
In universe, it's reasonable to speculate that permanence is the reason.
Of course, you still have the problem that Sisko should have been Captain Sisko on the Defiant from season 3 onwards, so perhaps there isn't really a concrete in-universe explanation.
Voyager was small
Is anyone going to listen to my repeated reminders that the Intrepid class is actually larger than the Constitution class...
This is a very good point!It might also explain why her ops officer was so low ranking: Academy might have just begun teaching about the new tech, so a more senior officer wouldn't have been as knowledgeable
This would have made a lot of sense, but unfortunately it’s not canon in any way and screen evidence seems to suggest otherwise.Also, most probably the ship didn't have a low-ranking Ops officer: she had a dead Ops officer. So the junior Assistant to the Assisting Ops Assistant got the job instead, right off the bat.
The last two posts have it right. Voyager was small, but she was fancy and state if the art, with tech that even the Galaxy class flagship didn't have: bioneural circuits, superfast engines, and an EMH. It was right that a captain command her. It might also explain why her ops officer was so low ranking: Academy might have just begun teaching about the new tech, so a more senior officer wouldn't have been as knowledgeable.
Sisko should have been a Captain from Day One of DS9. And when he started commanding the fleet, he should have been boosted to at least RADM.
Shocking I know but people can go back to school and learn new things. So getting a more experienced officer should be easy enough for Starfleet to arrange. In the case of Kim if I'm remembering the scene right the ships Doctor has a line of something like "new operations officer" not chief operations so perhaps we can infer that he was simply a junior officer who in essence became head of the department after the rest of the department was killed.
Let's not get carried away Commodore would have been sufficient, Just because we never saw the rank on screen during TNG/DSN/VOY era doesn't mean it wasn't in use after all it appeared in PIC.
Sisko should have been a Captain from Day One of DS9. And when he started commanding the fleet, he should have been boosted to at least RADM.
Shocking I know but people can go back to school and learn new things. So getting a more experienced officer should be easy enough for Starfleet to arrange. In the case of Kim if I'm remembering the scene right the ships Doctor has a line of something like "new operations officer" not chief operations so perhaps we can infer that he was simply a junior officer who in essence became head of the department after the rest of the department was killed.
Rear Admiral lower half is a 1 star rank equal to commodore that it replaces Rear Admiral upper half is a 2 star rank
Yesterday's battleship is today's frigate, and tomorrow's destroyer. As Starfleet's needs and engineering capacity increase, so will ship size. So yes, a 23rd century first-rate could easily be smaller than a 24th century third rate.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.