• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why the love for Ralph McQuarrie?

I don't really care for the design but the concept is interesting. A little refinement can go a long way, and really stand out as an alternative to the "clean/postmodern" look of trek ships in the 80's and 90's. Since nuBSG and Firefly, the rage has been to dirty up ships and make everything nitty gritty - its the 00's and 10's look now. I want it to be regonizable as star trek, but i want it different enough that I know its something new (and hopefully better) than what came before.
 
I think RAMA means its fine not liking something on a personal level due to aesthetic tastes - we all have different tastes - but trying to say it's 'technologically wrong' is very dubious, since there is nothing in Star Trek that would forbid a ship like this technologically, or even aesthetically. I mean the Defiant is a far greater departure from Starfleet's visual style, that Matt Jefferies set down.

It actually looks really appropriate as a lost era ship IMO, with a very distinctive generational look, that sets it apart just the same way as you can immediatly identify a TNG era ship.

In many ways it looks, to me, more naturally Starfleet-like than half the stuff we get in B-canon and video games; which usually involves getting the classic shape and stretching or, or rounding it, in a really unimaginative way. It looks like a retro ship from an era between TMP or TOS - which is probably exactly what it is meant to be. I believe people used to explain the MacQuarrie designs as being an early "shuttle carrier", from the days when transporters were perhaps less prevalent - maybe the Discovery needs that huge sweeping secondary hull as a landing deck, for its shuttle-bays, launching lots of them for long range planetary survey missions in deep space?

Agreed.
 
I don't really care for the design but the concept is interesting. A little refinement can go a long way, and really stand out as an alternative to the "clean/postmodern" look of trek ships in the 80's and 90's. Since nuBSG and Firefly, the rage has been to dirty up ships and make everything nitty gritty - its the 00's and 10's look now. I want it to be regonizable as star trek, but i want it different enough that I know its something new (and hopefully better) than what came before.
Trek ships in the 90's weren't all that remarkable... the Defiant, the Romulan Warbird, and the Breen warships were the only ones that stood out to me in a sea of "saucer and rocket" vessels.
 
It actually looks really appropriate as a lost era ship IMO, with a very distinctive generational look, that sets it apart just the same way as you can immediatly identify a TNG era ship.
Yeah, most Star Fleet designs seem to appear in bursts, or distinct generations. Designs from the same era probably appear similar, because they are based on the same technology, And because it takes time to develop new technology, these generations are likely far apart in time.

But what about times between generations?

I can imagine stop gap designs being built to replace old ships. And because these aren't intended to be the new uber ships, the next quantum leap in design, these stop gap vessels may tend to be utilitarian.
 
Last edited:
Nope. Most remarks revolve around very pre-conceived ideas and long formed opinions about how a ship "Should" look..that a ship has to look "balanced" when with fictional technology it really doesn't. Then we get a long laundry list of what's "wrong" with the ship that's based on very closely measured distances between pylon and engine nacelles, etc that were are supposed to take as religion and talked about with the same fervor
Nope. Other people, like me, just say that's it's ugly.
 
I don't understand why people are happy to see McQuarrie's work featured in Star Trek. All I see from folks are comments about his legendary status, but not actually praising the shape of the ship.

I don't get it either. The ship is just fugly from every angle shown. No saving grace whatsoever. Even the horrible Vengeance looks better.
 
I think that Discovery may be a generational orphan. A Lost Era ship built as a stop gap, when no other new designs were being built.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top