• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"Why the Enterprise-D Was Badly Designed"

^I still think the Defiant is a bit ugly, though I've come to feel that's part of the intention. It's not a ship of peace, it's a ship of war, and it's designed much more explicitly to get its hands dirty versus any Enterprise.
 
I just always thought it squat, ugly, ungainly and unbalanced.

This. It looks so front-heavy that I feel like it's going to start flipping end over end.


Part of the reason for the "cruise ship in space" feel was that the original intention when they were creating the show was that the Enterprise-D would be on an extended (20-year?) mission exploring the unknown, so you'd have crew bringing their family with them, you'd have more luxurious quarters, you'd have more places for people to hang out and relax in their downtime.

Everything makes so much more sense this way. If they realistically weren't coming back to Federation space for a generation, the children/the city in space makes so much more sense. I still don't agree in any sense with children on a starship, but it at least makes slightly more sense.

My biggest problem with the D is that it all just looks so bland and colorless. I read one critique that said the bridge looked like a dentist's office waiting room in 1985... and that's pretty much it.
 
Just retcon it that it's 10000 people instead. Or 20000. They're people we never see anyway, so who cares.
I like the proportions. I think Andrew Probert did great coming up with a new design that wasn't just a big TOS ship. I think it's great having variety in Starfleet.
 
Enterprise-D is too big for around 1000 people?
Who knows where adventures might take them, it's good to have to extra space on the ship.
"Evacuate 14000 people from Tagatanuga 5."
"Yes, sir, we have the space for them."

But, to the author's point, the ship is meant to evoke size and awe in the viewer, demonstrating the incredible things the Federation could do..

Being big and mean looking might also put some fear into someone planning an attack.
 
As for the whole "Oooh, it looks unbalanced." complaints, just imagine that the stern section of the Enterprise-D is composed of sufficiently weighty superdensium (or whatever fictional material is pulled from neutron stars) that compensates for the larger volume of the saucer section. Voyager also "suffers" from this same "problem".
 
Loved the D from day one. I had 2 of the Cheerios posters, mint in their shipping tubes but they (too) mysteriously disappeared over the years. Damn thieves! The evolution from the ENT-Refit was clear enough for me.

As for its apparent imbalance, it ain't. Remember the 2 nacelles contain mega-tons of warp coils which counter-balance the weight of the saucer. So while it may appear imbalanced it really is balanced. One quarter of one nacelle coils are visible here at top right.

ETA screen grab:
Dgr47AN.png


https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Nacelle
 
Last edited:
I think the D is a pretty design, and it has an iconic feel to it that evokes emotion in me when I see her on screen.

That said, the design is not nearly as good as the original Enterprise nor the refit version.

I don’t mind the interior design on the D either. As others have pointed out, being comfortable and a “community in space” actually matches the ship’s mission profile.
 
Well, I don't think there is a meanness to the size.

It can be taken that way. Aggression can be inferred by size. Intimidation is a thing that can be triggered by the size of something you're faced with.

Let's have a moment of crazy alt-history. Let's say, when Marco Polo sails up to China, he finds himself seeing in the distance, a version of the Burj Khalifa, a skyscraper half a mile high. That's going to inspire awe. And fear. This is a society that has mastered levels understanding in Engineering and Mathematics that Polo could not conceive.

People can reflexively fear a society that could do such a thing. People can take accomplishments like that as a sign of an aggressive society. Why build a thing like that? To show OTHERS that we can.

Some primitive culture that can barely traverse half its solar system coming across a Galaxy or Sovereign? The response could easily be, "Holy ----, look at the people at our door. They are clearly planning to kill us all because why bring THAT to our orbit unless you're prepared to use it."
 
Honestly I think the Enterprise-D is the best looking ship. Especially the interiors, they are reasonably tasteful for the time period it was created in, and have a very 'homey' feel to it. If I was going to live on a Spaceship for 7 years, I'd choose that one.
I quite like the exterior.

When it comes to the original, I don't really have a strong opinion on the exterior design. But I don't really like how brightly coloured the interior is, especially all that orange. Here I also understand that it was the taste of the time period and that it was also required to be colourful for the early colouTV audience. But When the Ent-D ends up looking somewhat like a 1980s hotel, then the TOS-Ent ends up looking somewhat like 1960s/70s hospital. It just doesn't fit my personal taste.Though I do like Sulu's weird alien plants and wish we had seen something like that whenever they showed the arboretum in TNG.
I'm just more the muted colours type when it comes to interior design.
But I can understand that somebody else might find it boring.
 
Let's have a moment of crazy alt-history. Let's say, when Marco Polo sails up to China, he finds himself seeing in the distance, a version of the Burj Khalifa, a skyscraper half a mile high. That's going to inspire awe. And fear. This is a society that has mastered levels understanding in Engineering and Mathematics that Polo could not conceive.

People can reflexively fear a society that could do such a thing. People can take accomplishments like that as a sign of an aggressive society. Why build a thing like that? To show OTHERS that we can.

Star Trek has often been criticized for promoting imperialism.
 
My only real complaint lies with Ten Forward; a lounge for a ship of such a prodigious bearing should have been considerably larger.
The arboretum too. The only way I can even accept that tiny thing we saw in a couple episodes that it is some sort of antechamber or specially sectioned-off portion of a much larger complex (for example maybe a section where young plants are grown before they are placed into the "real" arboretum). I mean how are 1000 people supposed to find rest and relaxation there otherwise?
 
The design of every Enterprise is impractical.

The D is one of the better-looking ones, and that's what matters. And it's a lot more plausible that a construction that advanced would be luxurious than that it would be all gray and cramped and "practical."

The cheapest room in any Motel 6 in America is palatial compared to the house my dad grew up in (let's start with the plumbing).

Star Trek is based in the popular narratives of European colonialism. The folks responsible for it in latter days are clearly concerned by that and keep finding ways to signal that those elements are vestigal or were misunderstood or trivial, but in fact they're foundational.
 
My only real complaint lies with Ten Forward; a lounge for a ship of such a prodigious bearing should have been considerably larger.
That's fair. Have you ever watched that video where they POV around the insides of a recreated E-D. It shows there's actually a lot more bars on the ship.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top