• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why Star Trek Sucks

Status
Not open for further replies.
Given that one of the premises of TNG was that Starfleet officers devote their life to duty rather than frivolous hobbies

Which is why they go to the holodeck to pretend to be detectives, fight monsters, re-enact Shakespeare?

That's General Order 74, to be carried out whenever the props and costumes budget is running low. Its predecessor in Jim Kirk's era was General Order 21, requiring the ship to visit a planet with a culture coincidentally just like some period of Earth's history. Guess they must have run out of those. :p
 
We do see the crews engaging in hobbies outside of the holodeck. Sulu had a series of hobbies, Beverly did stage plays, Riker played music, Picard dabbled in archeology and tried painting, Sisko built a few models, Paris had a interest in history.


:)
 
Really most of the 'sterile culture' criticisms of TNG apply to the first season where six year olds learn calculus. After that they really laid off that angle.

That was memorably extreme. Agreed that Bashir/O'Brien, Quark and Tom Paris especially brought the tone more down-to-Earth.
I like Trek and in particular TNG in part because I don't think it's entirely realistic for how we could live today but provides well-done, thought-provoking ideals, some that we should live by already and some that we can make progress toward.
 
I like Trek and in particular TNG in part because I don't think it's entirely realistic for how we could live today but provides well-done, thought-provoking ideals, some that we should live by already and some that we can make progress toward.
I give the first season credit for attempting to present a future which is different than our own present. However, some of these differences are things I would hope we never obtain, and I personally see as negatives (the differences weren't all first season).

People will have no fear of death. It's considered odd that a child would mourn the death of a parent. People will have no desire to have possessions.

Those are just a few examples.

:)
 
Last edited:
I do like the idea that people don't fritter their time away like we are doing right now and have purpose to their action. But I find the writers' conceit that the only types of entertainment worth pursuing are those which require years of technical education to be kind of ridiculous. Because that has an 'Intellectual superiority of the rich and educated' connotation.
 
"Shades of Grey" wrapped up TNG's second season. It is the episode that originated that iconic image of Riker laying down, his eyes closed, head stuck in this machine and all these glass tubes from it poking into his head. Essentially, Riker had been in a medical emergency that required past memories to be relived, so that his body's neural responses to them would weaken the alien infection which had invaded his body. Which was more shitful: TNG's "Shades of Grey" or STAR WARS: Caravan of Courage? That's the question which no one seems to have an answer for ...
I would say that the movie Shades of Grey was worse than either one.
 
Please take a moment to read the posting rules (linked at the top of the forum).

This thread has been dead for 4 years.

Let's let it rest in peace.

320x240_zpsbe2d00f7.jpg

"Hailing Frequencies Closed"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top