.
Last edited:
Think you answered your own question right there.Of course, McCoy is closer to Kirk than Kirk is to Scott.
But since Scotty IS third-in-charge normally, which McCoy cannot be, I can only assume that Scotty does not need any advice that Spock would,
I've always thought that it was a nice character moment for all three of them.It was a story convention to get Spock and McCoy to make up and start working together. I don't about it any more deeply than that.
but would Scott move up to first officer?Scotty IS third-in-charge
In the beginning, it was assumed that the stories would dictate which episodes needed the doctor or chief engineer or both, and that in some episodes they would not be required. Regarding Sulu and Uhura, they were just Kirk's chauffeur and switchboard operator. Anybody could sit in those chairs-- literally anybody who fit a costume.
Then GR apparently decided that DeForest Kelley was a star of the show rather than a character actor, so every episode had to have a doctor part. Jimmy Doohan never quite got there, but his strong character portrayal, combined with his character's rank, gave him an edge over the other supporting actors.
I would think that would have been the decision of the acting CO (Spock) until the ship returned to a starbase and/or received official orders for its personnel.but would Scott move up to first officer?
Spock nicely handled the double job of being first officer and science officer (both involved being on the bridge a lot). But would Scotty be similarly able to be both first officer and chief engineer, from opposite ends of the ship?
Or would a different officer (one of the ship's commanders/lieutenant commanders) but moved into the first officer's slot.
Leaving Scott in engineering.
What about Chekov, in your view? His status and screen time were usually on Sulu and Uhura's level.
<shrug> They were more interested in trying to get some of the Davy Jones heat from The Monkees than anything else, so they cast an actor who looked a bit like Jones. It's not that complicated.Imagine if Kirk had been written up and cast with as little care. And if Chekov was "not that important," then why bring him in at all? If it's worth doing, it's worth doing right.
<shrug> They were more interested in trying to get some of the Davy Jones heat from The Monkees than anything else, so they cast an actor who looked a bit like Jones. It's not that complicated.
I think Walter Koenig did a good job with what little he was given. The Chekov character had more background and development than poor Sulu, for instance, but that isn’t saying much.I've never been too thrilled with that character or his casting, which was done by seeing only one actor and hiring him on the spot. It strikes me as hurried and slapdash. I see it as a missed opportunity to think up a better character, and to find a performer who could bring in a special charisma, and perhaps gender balance or other kind of balance on top of that.
Imagine if Kirk had been written up and cast with as little care. And if Chekov was "not that important," then why bring him in at all? If it's worth doing, it's worth doing right.
"Kirky"?From past experience I can see why Kirky would have predicted there'd be friction.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.