I asked you what YOU think it means. Not what I think it means.
Then you really ought to see an optometrist. It's clear to anyone with one good eye that he's bowing from the waist and lowering his head. That's been a universal gesture of submission in all cultures throughout history. Symbols can be powerful things. That the president of the United States should make such a gesture to ANY human being on the planet is a disgrace to the office and to the country.I think it's meant as part of a greeting, if he's bowing at all (it's hard to tell from the picture).
Then you really ought to see an optometrist. It's clear to anyone with one good eye that he's bowing from the waist and lowering his head. That's been a universal gesture of submission in all cultures throughout history. Symbols can be powerful things. That the president of the United States should make such a gesture to ANY human being on the planet is a disgrace to the office and to the country.I think it's meant as part of a greeting, if he's bowing at all (it's hard to tell from the picture).
Can someone please explain this to me?
http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2010/01/31/more-groveling-by-obama/
Then you really ought to see an optometrist. It's clear to anyone with one good eye that he's bowing from the waist and lowering his head. That's been a universal gesture of submission in all cultures throughout history. Symbols can be powerful things. That the president of the United States should make such a gesture to ANY human being on the planet is a disgrace to the office and to the country.I think it's meant as part of a greeting, if he's bowing at all (it's hard to tell from the picture).
Interestingly, while President, Jefferson abandoned handshaking as undignified and only bowed to people he met.
And he's arrogant too...right?Then you really ought to see an optometrist. It's clear to anyone with one good eye that he's bowing from the waist and lowering his head. That's been a universal gesture of submission in all cultures throughout history. Symbols can be powerful things. That the president of the United States should make such a gesture to ANY human being on the planet is a disgrace to the office and to the country.I think it's meant as part of a greeting, if he's bowing at all (it's hard to tell from the picture).
Can someone please explain this to me?
http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2010/01/31/more-groveling-by-obama/
Holy shit, did we just surrender to Tampa? Goddamn Buccaneers.
What I love is that you and the idiots on that website are posting this and gloating while at the same time being blissfully ignorant of that fact that this entirely undercuts your argument that Obama occasionally bowing to foreign dignitaries is meant to be a sign of US subservience to foreign powers and not just his own form of personal greeting.
Unless you're stupid enough to believe he's implying that the United States is subservient to the will of the mayor of one of its own cities, in which case there's not much I can do about you harboring that kind of delusion.
I've yet to hear what I consider to be a satisfactory answer, but I'm in no way gloating.
Why not?
...he's bowing from the waist and lowering his head. That's been a universal gesture of submission in all cultures throughout history.
Why not?
Because, in my opinion, the Prez should not be bowing to anyone who holds political office. Bowing is traditionally done by the subservient party.
The only person I could see the Prez either bowing to or kneeling in front of would be the Pope. Assuming that it's in his heart to do so. And if Obama were a conservative I'd be saying the exact same thing.
Why not?
Because, in my opinion, the Prez should not be bowing to anyone who holds political office. Bowing is traditionally done by the subservient party.
No. Bowing is traditionally not done.Bowing is traditionally done by the subservient party.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.