They would all be dead if they followed Kirk's orders in the wormhole before they even encountered V'Ger. Decker saved the ship.
True but Kirk saved the Earth.
They would all be dead if they followed Kirk's orders in the wormhole before they even encountered V'Ger. Decker saved the ship.
True but Kirk saved the Earth.
Again, that's the question on the table. Did he really? Spock melded with V'Ger and got key insights. Decker connected with the probe to learn more and made the sacrifice that most directly saved the Earth. Kirk's specific contributions are more nebulous.
He said so as as the ships's First Officer, its his job to provide an alternative view to the Captain role. He was speaking as Commander Decker not Captain DeckerBut Decker would never have gotten that chance if he was the man in charge. He said so himself: "Moving into that Cloud, at this time, is an unwarranted gamble."
Without Kirk's decision, they would have stayed outside the cloud and be as ineffective as all the other vessels that tried to stop it. V'Ger would have gotten (quite fast) to the Earth and killed "every carbon unit infesting its surface". End of story!!
He said so as as the ships's First Officer, its his job to provide an alternative view to the Captain role. He was speaking as Commander Decker not Captain Decker
He wasn't offering any alternative solution, he just said: "It's an unwarranted gamble" IOW, something he wouldn't have done himself.
And then he calmly said "you asked my opinion" and offered no further objection when Kirk went ahead anyway. So we can't assume it was his absolute, immutable position.
Anyway, the question is not about what Decker did or didn't do. It's about what Kirk did. The fact that nobody seems able to answer that question except with handwaves and hypotheticals about Decker just underlines my point that Kirk's own contributions were unclear. If you can't answer a question without changing the subject, then you don't have a solid answer to that question.
Really, would going inside the cloud really have made that much difference? They'd already provoked V'Ger's curiosity with the linguacode message; that was why they were still there instead of reduced to data patterns like the Klingons. So V'Ger might still have sent the probe to take a sample and/or drawn them in with a tractor beam, rendering the whole argument moot.
At any time V'Ger could have decided that it had had enough of Kirk's bullshit and vaporized them like they were nothing. So I find it unlikely that the more prudent and even rational Decker would have gone anywhere.
Kirk, for example, used bluff, he made V'ger think that he (alone) had the answers to V'Ger's questions but it turned out that bluffing was the only thing at his disposal at the time. They were only seconds away from becoming computer data. A show of weakness, a bout of candor and zap!!! Bullshit won the day.
I don't know. To really do it TOS style, they'd have to have a big group laugh on the bridge at the end, like in "The Galileo Seven" or "The Changeling," even though people died.They wrote themselves into suck a corner with Kirk and Decker’s relationship that the only way they could deal with it was essentially having Kirk and Decker “just grow up and get on with the mission” until Decker gets “killed off”. We never see whether Kirk feels any regret, guilt or anything for stealing Decker’s command. It just kind of gets glossed over on the ending wrap up TOS style.
Interesting! I stand corrected. It seems like a very significant plot point to simply get “lost in the shuffle”. But then again, there was a lot of friction between Roddenberry and Livingston playing “tug-of-war” with script revisions so hardly ideal conditions for maintaining internal continuity and consistency. And there was so much world building that had to be done. For viewers not already familiar with Star Trek, the film had to quickly get across what star fleet and the federation are about (helped greatly by the United Nations inspired federation logo), the characters, the basic technology - transporters, warp drive, communicators, etc., and for viewers familiar with the show, what each of the characters have been up to (at least the ones that in different places than they were in the show). With a story that predominately takes place on the enterprise with no real civilian characters and so much to bring the audience up to speed on, its hard to justify devoting screentime for showing Decker’s personal beliefs about a civilian movement without it being just some exposition awkwardly forced in somewhere.I don't know the exact date, but it was definitely in the pre-production phase. Scenes addressing it were in the script but were cut out. It seems they had a clear idea of the character all along; it's just that much of it got lost in the shuffle.
I still don't get what V'Ger turned into?
Something wonderful.I still don't get what V'Ger turned into?
Something wonderful.
yes2010?
My big gripe with the Cloud/V'ger encounter has always been:
The point being that seeing the crew actively trying to deal with the problem in any way they can, even failing miserably at each step, raises the stakes because the situation worsens and their options are dwindling. They can't communicate with the Intruder nor as not learning anything, so their desperate and only chance is the probe.
- Once Spock determines where the signal and they reply, no one ever mentions what the signal was or any efforts to decode it
- After the zippy linguacode message saves their butts there's (shown or implied) no effort made to communicate further
- Once inside V'ger there's apparently no effort to "peek in the windows" of all those glowing whatevers they are...yes, the scans are reflected back passive sensors and your eyeballs still work fine
- In shot, the crew is passive
I recall a lot of movies that did something like this, including Barbarella, 2001, or the Fantastic Journey. It's as if they thought the visual feast would be awesome and inspiring forever more.^OMG - You nailed it exactly. I was always bugged about that part of the move -- I had attributed it to it just being so slow and long, your breakdown succinctly puts into words a feeling I couldn't quite articulate. Yeah, why couldn't they just go and look inside that green window that looks like a smiling cat, or check out those weird egg things? (seriously, what were those things? Xenomorph incubators?)
It really is an overtly passive sequence. Decker even calls Spock out on his lack of trying. Which, while consistent with Spock's character arc at that point in the story, really does little to help sell that anyone in the movie is taking the potential threat to Earth very seriously. And if they don't care, why should we as the audience?
Compare this to the Mutara Nebula scene where, in spite of instrumentation failures, you see Kirk and Spock trying to find ways to hone in on the Reliant and anticipate Kahn's moves. Even thought this is also a long sequence, the tension and stakes are always felt.
It is frustrating because I could tell so much effort went into crafting many of the effects for both the cloud and V'ger, with so much care to differentiate the different "regions" of the cloud and the different components of V'ger. Yet nothing or no one in the story have anything to say about them. Even with the lack sensors Spock or other characters could have been commenting or speculating on what they saw. Heck, this is exactly Spock was doing this during his spacewalk, why are they so silent in the cloud? It seems like at the time the bridge scenes were being filmed, no one really knew what these characters would be looking at. I am guessing that by the nature of how it was filmed that it had to be pretty well conceptualized and story boarded before filming, which might have allowed Nimoy's dialog to be tailored to match the visuals better. The cloud and V'ger flyover, I don't know that
By the all is said and done, all we got out of it is.
1) V'ger is pretty damn big
2) V'ger likes to drive around with his own smog cloud.
I think the context of this story is what made these issues more problematic. This was the first new live-action Star Trek in 10 years. It is the first time we would see them on the big screen, with (comparatively) big budget effects and visuals. Our beloved characters were going to encounter this mysterious alien craft that is larger and stranger than any they have encountered before. But they wouldn't go "onboard" this mysterious vessel to explore it inside or even explore any of the curious things they saw on its surface of this immense vessel. No, instead they spend the back half of the film sitting in this thing's rectum. And just when they start to get some answers, woosh, the whole thing is gone. That is a heck of a curveball to throw the audience at the time. Ironically, the film that is arguably the closest to the "explore strange new worlds" mantra of TOS feels like so little exploring was actually done.
I think the last thing TMP needs is more shots of the cast staring at special effects.I would have liked to see a couple of shots of crew in other locations looking out of viewing ports, maybe including McCoy and Chapel so it wasn't necessary for McCoy to wander onto the bridge like a yo yo so much.
Not to be analNo, instead they spend the back half of the film sitting in this thing's rectum.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.