• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why I refuse to ever watch this movie

Status
Not open for further replies.
What bothers me is this- by setting it in an alternate timeline, it means the 'future' of this new Enterprise crew is unwritten.

Bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha!

That's the best thing about the film. They can go anywhere they want from here.

And all those original episodes and films are still there to be rewatched whenever we want.


A new timeline means the original timeline was ERASED

What about the Mirror Universe? That's an alternate timeline that coexisted with the one we all know and love, so why can't this one too?
 
Bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha!

That's the best thing about the film. They can go anywhere they want from here.

And all those original episodes and films are still there to be rewatched whenever we want.


A new timeline means the original timeline was ERASED
No it doesnt, the original timeline goes on as normal, this one is ALTERNATE. Do you understand that word? Go check your DVD shelf, Im sure all your old trek is still there.


I disagree- think of the STTNG epsisode 'Yesterday's Enterprise'- When the enterprise C went back into the rift, it ERASED the reality where the Klingons conquered the Federation. Likewise, whatever happened in the new star Trek film changed history and ERASED all the events of TOS, and of the events of the following series-
 
So, how long before someone declares that the CG spaceships in this movie don't look as real as the models did in some of the old Star Trek movies? Because I swear to God saying that is copping to being legally blind or terminally obstinate.

Well it's, you know, Star Trek. So that shouldn't take more then, oh, let's say, 1 minute? :D
 
What about the Mirror Universe? That's an alternate timeline that coexisted with the one we all know and love, so why can't this one too?

Because someone who hasn't even seen the film (in which they hammer home the parallel point prety unsubtly) says so?
 
Bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha!

That's the best thing about the film. They can go anywhere they want from here.

And all those original episodes and films are still there to be rewatched whenever we want.


A new timeline means the original timeline was ERASED

What about the Mirror Universe? That's an alternate timeline that coexisted with the one we all know and love, so why can't this one too?


That's different- that was an alternate universe, not an alternate timeline
 
I disagree- think of the STTNG epsisode 'Yesterday's Enterprise'- When the enterprise C went back into the rift, it ERASED the reality where the Klingons conquered the Federation. Likewise, whatever happened in the new star Trek film changed history and ERASED all the events of TOS, and of the events of the following series-

You're wrong. End of story.
 
What bothers me is this- by setting it in an alternate timeline, it means the 'future' of this new Enterprise crew is unwritten.

Bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha!

That's the best thing about the film. They can go anywhere they want from here.

And all those original episodes and films are still there to be rewatched whenever we want.


A new timeline means the original timeline was ERASED
No. It doesn't. It means a new branch broke away from the moment the Kelvin was attacked and grew from there. The "original" is not "erased". IF ever anyone wanted (with Paramount's approval, of course) to revisit that timeline, it is there to do so. The only thing about that one is Romulus is destroyed in 2387 and Spock disappears from that timeline in the same year. Otherwise, life goes on in that timeline.

The precedent for this is found in many Trek episodes, so I'll not bother listing them all here.

On a practical note, it is unlikely that anyone WILL revisit the "original" timeline in quite some time, if ever--at least on screen (novels will have crossovers, I'm sure of it). THAT can be a legitimate source of disappointment for those who wish to see more of the original timeline on screen. But that is a separate argument.
 
So has anyone told Pocket Books and IDW that they can't publish any more books and comics set in the now "wiped out" timeline?

Because their schedules for the forseeable future seem to be full of them...
 
I disagree- think of the STTNG epsisode 'Yesterday's Enterprise'- When the enterprise C went back into the rift, it ERASED the reality where the Klingons conquered the Federation. Likewise, whatever happened in the new star Trek film changed history and ERASED all the events of TOS, and of the events of the following series-

You're wrong. End of story.


How so? Enterprise C was sent back into the rift so the timeline where the Klingons were destroying the Federation would CEASE to exist.
It stands to reason a changed history in the new film ERASED the timeline of TOS we all know..
 
A new timeline means the original timeline was ERASED

What about the Mirror Universe? That's an alternate timeline that coexisted with the one we all know and love, so why can't this one too?


That's different- that was an alternate universe, not an alternate timeline

Okay, Kirk's Brain. Everything I say is a lie.

Now, dig on this: I am lying.

......

......

......

Nothing? Ah well, it would have been negligent of me not to try.
 
For fucks sake..

This forum really needs a sticky with capital, bold letters, flashing lights and red alert sound that will inform people that the past Trek was not erased, all the dvds were not scratched and the new movie takes place in a new alternate universe.

:klingon:
 
I guess it comes down to the real Trekkers vs the newbie trekkies.
Ive been a hardcore trekker since 1976, and know a turkey when I see it- this film is a turkey. If the newbies don't know what Star trek is all about, then i'm sure they'd like this canon-ignoring film.

I do NOT concider the new Star trek film to be canon.

Not so. I've been a fan for 35 years. I think the new movie with it's ALTERNATE TIMELINE is fantastic!! The new movie can't be accused of ignoring canon since canon isn't yet set in this reality. It's a new canon. If you take it as such, you should have no problem with the new movie. The original canon still exists, that universe is still out there, this one runs alongside it in another reality.
Listen, the new movie is great fun and takes nothing from the classic Trek that I grew up with and love dearly. If you want, take this like one of the old Marvel 'What if?' comics. This movie won't ruin classic Trek for you. It is and always will be there. But the Trek universe is big enough for this movie as well.
 
I disagree- think of the STTNG epsisode 'Yesterday's Enterprise'- When the enterprise C went back into the rift, it ERASED the reality where the Klingons conquered the Federation. Likewise, whatever happened in the new star Trek film changed history and ERASED all the events of TOS, and of the events of the following series-

You're wrong. End of story.


How so? Enterprise C was sent back into the rift so the timeline where the Klingons were destroying the Federation would CEASE to exist.
It stands to reason a changed history in the new film ERASED the timeline of TOS we all know..
The existence of Sela in the "restored" timeline is a powerful indication that the "war" timeline was not erased.
 
For fucks sake..

This forum really needs a sticky with capital, bold letters, flashing lights and red alert sound that will inform people that the past Trek was not erased, all the dvds were not scratched and the new movie takes place in a new alternate universe.

:klingon:


Alternate timelines and alternate universes are not the same thing...
 
On a practical note, it is unlikely that anyone WILL revisit the "original" timeline in quite some time, if ever--at least on screen...

This is true.

However, we've no reason to believe that the studio had any real intention of revisiting Star Trek, period, on the screen at all apart from this movie (Kerner burning up his development money on the Jendressen script on his way out the door notwithstanding). So it's really a difference which makes no difference.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top