• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why do we buy/collect Star Trek books?

There are several reasons for my interest in books and comics that continue and expand the Star Trek universe (several other universes like Doctor Who and Star Wars are of interest to me in similar ways, to greater and lesser extent). These extra stories can give us a different perspective or interpretation of the universes’ background for one thing. I recently went hunting for the original books that introduce the Romulans as "Rihansu" (sorry, I don’t remember how it’s spelled), as I was curious to see an alternative take on the Romulans. I snapped up The Final Reflection because I read somewhere that book does something similar for Klingons. When I watched through the old series, I came across a gem of an episode that I hardly hear anyone talk about, "The Day of the Dove." Beyond the echoes of scenarios and situations that reappear in "The Search For Spock" and "Star Trek: First Contact" there was an interesting comment from the female Klingon about her species; she referred to her people as hunters. Not warriors, but hunters. You could develop a cultural identity that is totally different, from that kind of psychological inclination. It suggested to me a subtle, yet profoundly different approach to how Klingons might have been defined by subsequent writers. It doesn’t exclude the Warrior aspect/approach that writers seemed to focus on in later stories, but what if we didn’t confine and bottleneck the Klingons in that way, and imagined them differently? Naturally, the same thing with the Romulans.

I recently got the complete Star Trek comics collection CD/DVD that has all the comics from the 1960's up to 2002. The story line I’m most excited about is the DC series one, that features the crew having adventures between the second, third, fourth and fifth Star Trek movies. And while I consider that I may find the series stretching credibility in an effort to bring the characters to where they need to be in order to not conflict with each Star Trek movie’s release, I am so far enthralled with the fun of seeing what we might have thought would happen next after The Wrath of Khan. DC series one is quick to move on and do it’s own thing, while moving forward into the future as they thought it might be. Kirk moves to take command of the Enterprise as a Captain, Saavak takes over as science officer, and Sulu fills in as first officer. Carol and David have already returned to Regula I to continue their work. And McCoy ponders what Spock intends that he is supposed to "Remember!" And I’m not anywhere near the Mirror Universe saga that leads to the crew being assigned to Excelsior, with Spock going off on his own to captain a science vessel (between Treks III and IV).

I guess I very much like the idea of not getting to confined by continuity, by virtue of a personal philosophical approach to fiction; I think of it in terms of how I think of the whole King Arthur story and all it’s variations. There’s been so much fun in seeing how different interpretations have taken the legends and stories about King Arthur, the knights of the round table and the Grail Quest and presented them anew. There’s the Sir Thomas Mallery or TH White versions. The Hallmark movie Merlin was an exciting reinterpretation from Merlin’s perspective. Clive Owen’s King Arthur was certainly different, speculating about what the real historical origins might have been. Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade uses the story as a background set up for the new story. And Peter David brought King Arthur into the 20th Century and reunited him with his old friends and enemies that have also survived the passing centuries. Dare I even mention Monty Python and the Holy Grail? Don’t say Galaxy Quest; Monty Python didn’t have to change the names! All of these retellings are not constricted by a need for consistency, yet they have enough elements that are familiar and therefore recognizable. Arthur and his court are certainly not going away anytime soon. By the same token, I relish the opportunity to delve into alternative interpretations of Star Trek, and hope that will contribute to it’s longevity in popular culture.

The Reeves-Stevens book, Federation, is one of my favorite ST novels, and I will never fault it for having a conflicting history for Zephram Cochrane. In some ways, there’s a sense of grandeur to Cochrane’s story in Federation that is just not the same as what we see in First Contact. Federation is also the story that I wish had been Star Trek: Generations. In every way, it’s a more satisfying story. Peter David’s Vendetta was ST: First Contact, at least until First Contact came out: it’s the epic Borg story that I craved after The Best of Both Worlds. First Contact I love very much, but Vendetta was there for us until 1996 rolled around (doesn’t mean I’ve ditched Vendetta). Setting aside the unfortunate circumstances behind the writing of Probe, I’ve read comments that Probe is what they wished had been Star Trek V The Final Frontier. I don’t dislike STV TFF, but I’ll keep Probe, too; as I enjoyed it (sorry to hear about the heartache and heartbreak behind it, Margaret Wander Bonanno!). So, in a way, the books have been alternatives to the cinematic Star Trek series.
The books and comics helpfully present what might have happened that we missed in the series and movies, I thinking about the Lost Years and The Lost Era, and the Buried Age; Prime Directive and any other story that fills out the fourth and fifth year of Kirk’s original five year mission. For some it’s the A Time to... series.

There is also the helpful suggestions about inconsistencies. Some authors will take the time to offer explanations. And what’s the deal with the whole United Earth Space Probe Agency thing, what was that all about, where did it go?

These days, books and comics are now in a great position, the same opportunity that Doctor Who books were able to take advantage of between 1989 (the end of the old series) and 2005 (the start of the new series continuation of the old). To Forge Ahead! It’s such an important thing, and it feels like what Star Trek is all about. To boldy go where no one has gone before, that suggests to me the notion of moving forward, and I’m very excited to see that this is happening. At this point, with the only approaching mainstream Star Trek production returning to Star Trek’s roots (which I do think is good), the prospects of pushing the farthest future-most point of the Star Trek universe forward is limited, and possibly delayed for quite a long while, as far as I can tell. Especially in the medium of official sanctioned, canonical productions. The books are as good a place as any.

So, for me: Alternative perspectives and interpretations. Expanded understanding. Stories that I like better than the official ones. Stories that are going to go where the TV and movie stories aren’t going to go anytime soon, as far as I can tell.

Star Trek continues. The Human(?) Adventure is just beginning!
 
What I don't get are people who consider themselves serious fans but don't have any interest in the books. How can you not?

Horses for courses, Steve; for a lot of people a TV show is an immersive experience, which reading isn't (and there are those for whom reading isn't the pleasure it is for a lot of us!)

I have to admit that not liking reading is an alien mindset for me. I've known people who were actually proud of never ever reading a book for pleasure but I cannot imagine being that way myself; it's not how I'm wired.

(Let the record show that I've heard "horses for courses" many a time, but my wife and I have somewhat anglophilic tastes in both reading and TV.)
 
That was an excellent posts Desert Kris and thanks for taking so much time and effort to post it for us to read!

Kevin
 
I learned long ago never loan what I collect. It may piss friends off but I have invested a lot of money in my collection over the years and whenever I have lent something to friends in the past it 1) never gets returned or 2) never returns in the condition it left. So, now I just don't do it.

That sucks. I'm lucky to have a friend with broadly similar reading interests but different purchase priorities, so that our personal libraries often complement each other. We have our own interloan system between the two of us, and we're both anal about books so I never need worry about the condition I get the books back in (well, accidents happen, but it's understood we'll buy a fresh copy if we inadvertently damage a loan).

Fictitiously yours, Trent Roman
 
I guess it is an English idiom - but yes, means the same thing as "Different Strokes" except you don't automatically think someone is going to yell "Willis!!!" when you hear it. ;)

Ditto Down Under. I don't think I'd actually never heard of the expression "Diff'rent Strokes" until it was a TV show, and I thought it a weird choice of title till I connected it with the idiom.
 
I even hate loaning them- but thats cuz people keep them for months without bothering to read them! *shakes fist*

I learned long ago never loan what I collect. It may piss friends off but I have invested a lot of money in my collection over the years and whenever I have lent something to friends in the past it 1) never gets returned or 2) never returns in the condition it left. So, now I just don't do it.

Kevin

^QFT... sadly

And have you ever noticed how hard it is to get them back from the people who do give them back? I mean, if they haven't even opened after having it for at least 3 months...

And I do *collect* my Trek books, most of them are in great shape, a lot of the damage came from the bookstore itself. I think one thats worse for wear is MG1- and its quite large.

Speaking of the ASiT- have you looked for it used? I got mine for maybe 5$ in great shape. And now its mine. Mine!! :p
 
Like Paul Simpson, I've been reading and collecting Star Trek books since the early '70's. Up until the Arnold Regime, I faithfully read every title as soon as it appeared, even when I knew I wasn't going to like it (Marshak/Culbreath, I'm looking at you -- I bought my first copy of The Price of the Phoenix from them personally at a con in Los Angeles the month before it was officially released, and was really disgusted by the book when I got home and read it. Fate was even worse!)

I long ago got in the habit of buying 2 copies of each MMPB. I have a copy of EVERY Trek title published since 1967 lovingly wrapped in plastic on my library shelves, and at least 1 duplicate of each title stacked on the "reading copy" shelves in another room. Did someone mention OCD upthread...?

During the early '90's, I got behind on my reading, largely because the books became so distressingly bland. It was a big comedown from the '80's, when so many amazing books were first published. I've since gone back and read almost every TOS title, but there are dozens of TNG, DS9 and Voyager titles that I've never cracked open (either copy!)

In the last 10 years or so, as the quality steadily improved, I've made an effort to read most books as they are released, except for Voyager. Just can't force myself to read Voyager...

Oh, and I collect Star Trek comics, too. I have every Trek comic published since 1976 -- everything but the first 38 issues of the Gold Key run. I've read ALL of those. I can always find 20 minutes to read a comic book!

In short, it's a fun, satisfying, and relatively inexpensive habit. I'll take a Trek novel over drugs any day. No drug could ever match the trippiness of Spock, Messiah!
 
Wow Todd! Thanks for sharing! I don't think my wife would allow me the luxury of having two copies but I would love to have mint copies of everything wrapped in plastic. I suppose if I ever stopped reading them she would not be so forgiving of my hobby either.

And you're right...no drug can ever match the trippiness of Spock, Messiah!

Kevin
 
I got into Trek lit after the Enterprise ended. Though I had never realised this before I need a regular Trek fix. Since I read the books in English I have to buy them. If I wasn't too lazy to find a way of selling them I would only keep those that I'm likely to read again. Actually, I've read several of them more than once. So, I'm not a collector, just a reader.
 
My reason is a little bit different. I love sci-fi, I always have; I love the perspective on our world that science fiction provides. There's some famous quote about all art being an exaggeration or something like that, and that's how I view sci-fi: exaggerate some things, to show what happens to the rest when their context shifts radically.

Or to rephrase, there's an episode of Firefly wherein characters talk about how holding someone "over the volcano's edge" will show you who they truly are (which of course the show then proceeds to do with each character, one by one). I sort of view sci-fi as, in an odd way, holding humanity, or our entire moral conception of what humanity could/should be, over the volcano's edge. For instance, in one BSG episode, this dilemma is presented: sure, you may believe strongly that abortion is a fundamental right, but what if there are only a few thousand humans left at all?

But there's a problem with sci-fi, and that's that its most important benefit is also its biggest flaw - that to ask the really important questions, it has to set up a new universe for them to be asked in, which means establishing that universe. And that means that reading sci-fi is often difficult, especially for the more ambitious authors, because whole new vocabularies and concepts have to be learned (as in, taught to us by the author somehow) before the story can be properly enjoyed. This is not a complaint, just an observation - it's often a bit of a difficult project, taking on a new sci-fi series.

But that's where Star Trek has an important advantage. I know Star Trek's canvas. I know the races, I know the laws, I know the words, I know the history. So Star Trek can tell me deep, complex stories that make me think about science, or faith, or honor, or whatever, and it can skip completely the annoying parts of world-building. It still has its fair share of new ideas, characters, and worlds, but it doesn't have to teach me how to understand it. I can just jump in, and still get all the benefits of other sci-fi.

I'm not saying I read Star Trek because it's easier (though it is); it's just more efficient. I get what I want from science fiction in bundles of pure enjoyment, rather than 80% pure enjoyment and 20% instruction.

Some questions and situations Star Trek either can't or hasn't played with, and so I still enjoy the more avant-garde sci-fi creations (Anathem comes to mind, as does Blindsight, if anyone has read those), but Star Trek has all but 100% fulfilled the desire I have for rapidly digestible reading.

Now, one last comment - this kind of argument is often used to explain why tie-in fiction is lesser, as it allows readers to be lazy. I disagree completely. It means my brainpower is devoted entirely to pondering the meaning and weight of the story, rather than just to figuring it out. And this I see as a definite ADVANTAGE; as anyone who's played piano will tell you, if you're still figuring out where to put your fingers, you're not planning dynamics and flow. And if you're trying to figure out what the hell is going on, you're not thinking about what it means.

There's something to be said for the joy of decoding a totally alien new world, but the different approach of Star Trek and other tie-in fiction is in my view equally, if not more, valid (all else being equal).

Now, this of course depends on each tie-in series asking difficult questions, and here's where Star Trek wins out over all the others. Star Wars is a clusterf*ck of stupid nonsensical moralizing, but Star Trek has a canvas that can paint totally contradictory morality plays without sacrificing the integrity of either of them or the surrounding universe; it's ABOUT different points of view. I rarely read a Star Trek book that doesn't make me think about something. Star Wars, rather than being about differing points of view, attempts to be about good vs. evil, but the whole story has been swapped back and forth between simplistic definitions of good and evil to moral gray areas so many times that the whole thing has lost coherence and has ceased to mean anything. Star Trek, on the other hand, means more with every passing year.

So, does that answer the question? :)
 
That was an excellent posts Desert Kris and thanks for taking so much time and effort to post it for us to read!

Thanks for the feedback, it's a topic I felt enthusiastic about!:)

Interesting critique of the state of affairs in Star Wars fiction, Thrawn, sorry to hear it doesn't work for you. I agree with you in that it seems that they've lost their way a bit, but for me there are different reasons.

It's a good point that Star Trek fiction is a useful forum for presenting science fiction concepts without getting slowed down with the world building for every new story, it's a handy short cut, and there's only so much free time in the world.
 
Although, it my obsessive collecting does have exceptions. I knew I had Battle for Betazed at one point but couldn't remember for the life of me why I didn't have it, and thought maybe it was a rare stroke of niceness that led to me giving it to a friend. Now, years later I'm rereading it and I know exactly why I gave it away... not that it isn't well done. Its exciting and interesting... but its also traumatizing me... as morbidly curious as I am. :(

EDIT- tho now that I've finished it, as tense as things were... its still a good book worth reading... not as bad as my negative personality remember... :p

Draw from that what you will...
 
Last edited:
During the early '90's, I got behind on my reading, largely because the books became so distressingly bland. It was a big comedown from the '80's, when so many amazing books were first published. I've since gone back and read almost every TOS title, but there are dozens of TNG, DS9 and Voyager titles that I've never cracked open (either copy!)

I fell behind at about the same time, but then I ended up doing a long public transport commute for 4.5 years and I caught up with all those pesky, wayward DS9s and VOYs, in between reading newly-released TOS and TNG. I couldn't recall where I'd left off on VOY, so I ended up going backwards - until I started getting deja vu reading Nathan Archer's "Ragnorok" and realized I'd made it!

As for the Phoenix books, I had to collect most of the Bantams second hand, but I ended up reading "Fate..." before I finally found "Price..." Those books were... bizarre.
 
First off because I enjoy the Star Trek universe and I like seeing stories told that could never be told in the shows or movies.

I'm mainly a fan of classic science fiction. Most of the modern sci-fi I've tried just hasn't done it for me. Modern Trek Lit is the exception to that, there is a very strong core group of writers working on the Trek books right now.

I bought Trek books on and off over the years and usually found myself disappointed by them. I picked up the Crucible trilogy on a whim and was blown away by the high quality of storytelling. That led me to check out all of the other Trek series going on and I was surprised to find that the Trek books had skyrocketed in quality since the last time I looked at them.
 
I love the Star Trek universe for one. And the books allow me to immerse myself in that universe beyond the TV series. I can only watch a TV show so many times before it gets old, but there are always new books coming out so there's always new stories to delve into.

I enjoy many of the characters and like how the various relaunches are progressing them beyond what we saw on screen. Also, Trek lit sometimes just creates great and memorable characters/species. For me, like Quentin Stone, the cast of the Excalibur, the DS9-R characters, etc. that make reading Trek lit so worthwhile.

I like sci-fi in general, but there is so much of it out there, I don't even know where to start. The only non-Trek or Star Wars series of books I've been reading are the Dune stories. With Trek and SW, I know the universe, I know the players, and it allows me to get into the story quickly, and it's also really cool when an author reveals another side of a character you thought you knew so well.
 
I started reading the Trek books because I wanted more Trek stories. The local library was great in that they had a huge collection of Trek books. However, the time to wait for a new book was almost always 6 months after it's published in the US. Eventually, I lost patience, and I started earning money, so I started buying them.
 
I love the Star Trek universe for one. And the books allow me to immerse myself in that universe beyond the TV series. I can only watch a TV show so many times before it gets old, but there are always new books coming out so there's always new stories to delve into.

I enjoy many of the characters and like how the various relaunches are progressing them beyond what we saw on screen. Also, Trek lit sometimes just creates great and memorable characters/species. For me, like Quentin Stone, the cast of the Excalibur, the DS9-R characters, etc. that make reading Trek lit so worthwhile.

I like sci-fi in general, but there is so much of it out there, I don't even know where to start. The only non-Trek or Star Wars series of books I've been reading are the Dune stories. With Trek and SW, I know the universe, I know the players, and it allows me to get into the story quickly, and it's also really cool when an author reveals another side of a character you thought you knew so well.

I know we're venturing OT here, but for the record, the closest non-Trek sci-fi that I've found that has the same "feel" to me is the Uplift series by David Brin - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uplift_Universe

Don't start with the first book though; the first three are unrelated and stand alone (for real - 240 years passes between the first two), and to get a feel for the universe and if you like it, you should really read Startide Rising. If you love modern Trek, I have a hard time believing you wouldn't love that book.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top