The reason I see malevolent intent with Harry is that when people started complaining about it, they didn't just fix it. They clung to their "somebody gotta be duh ensign" stupidity, with the intensity of a toddler who's picked up someone else's teddy bear. It was important to them. And why, exactly? They had to know that it was stupid for a 6-year Starfleet veteran to still be an ensign, when every other recurring ensign in previous series had moved on go better things. Obviously, they wanted some specific result. And if you type "Harry kim meme" into Google, I think it becomes obvious that they got that result.Yes, but even if so, that doesn't indicate malevolence. They're trying to write a story and get s script out fast. Sometimes multiple scripts, while aiming for very episodic framework.
Further, since they've had 24 years and five Trek series to fix it and have steadfastly clung to it, even denying Garrett Wang appearances on PIC and PRO... it's still a really big deal to them.