• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why did Life on Mars US version get cut?

Brent

Admiral
Admiral
Over the last week I just watched all the episodes for the first time, including the finale, and I am wondering why it got axed? It was REALLY good! I've also seen a few of the British episodes but IMO the US version is much better. I would have liked to have seen this series go on longer :(
 
Over the last week I just watched all the episodes for the first time, including the finale, and I am wondering why it got axed? It was REALLY good! I've also seen a few of the British episodes but IMO the US version is much better. I would have liked to have seen this series go on longer :(

Are you looking for another reason besides "no one was watching it?"
 
Over the last week I just watched all the episodes for the first time, including the finale, and I am wondering why it got axed? It was REALLY good! I've also seen a few of the British episodes but IMO the US version is much better. I would have liked to have seen this series go on longer :(

Well why do they usually axe programs? Because everybody watches and loves them?
 
I don't know why it failed to bring in an audience on it's own merits, but it wasn't even the slightest patch on the original, it was OK, but they could have done much better with such a brilliant concept. Still better than a lot of the dross that is on though.

But none of the actors filled out their characters anywhere near as well as their British counterparts, and they brought zero dramatic gravity to the show. The British version established characters that were significantly stronger in a fraction of the time.
 
I don't know why it failed to bring in an audience on it's own merits, but it wasn't even the slightest patch on the original, it was OK, but they could have done much better with such a brilliant concept. Still better than a lot of the dross that is on though.

But none of the actors filled out their characters anywhere near as well as their British counterparts, and they brought zero dramatic gravity to the show. The British version established characters that were significantly stronger in a fraction of the time.
That, and the plots were forced. TV today doesn't allow for good enough plot development for a one-hour broadcast anymore. There's too much time allocated to commercials.
 
I certainly agree that the BBC show was able to do a lot more as it has an extra 20 minutes screen time for each episode. They were able to tell a good story, develop the characters properly and include a lot more detail into the 70's scenario.

They did precisely jack shit with Chris and Ray for most of the US show.
 
There's a fatal curse that strikes down most US imports of UK shows. It hasn't hit The Office, but most others die within a few weeks of being put out on air due to the fact that they can't really recapture the magic of the original. I watched the US Life on Mars, and ended up deleting it as I was bored with it after the first five minutes. Maybe it's just because it didn't have the magnificent Gene Hunt that Philip Glenister created, or maybe because I just don't like Americanized versions of UK TV shows, but it didn't gel for me.
 
Why wasn't anybody watching it? I don't get it, it was good!


Good shows don't always mean everyone (or enough people) will watch it. I think it's idea perhaps wasn't what people were interested in. Who knows.

Lots of good shows don't make it, lots of bad shows don't make it.

Sometimes good shows make it, sometimes bad shows make it.
 
Maybe the original U.S. version would have done better. From what I remember reading, they filmed the first pilot with an almost totally different cast, including Colm Meaney in what became the Harvey Keitel character. Apparently the producers didn't like their first effort so they recast and reworked the show, only keeping Jason O'Mara in the lead.
 
Maybe the original U.S. version would have done better. From what I remember reading, they filmed the first pilot with an almost totally different cast, including Colm Meaney in what became the Harvey Keitel character.

I doubt it would have done better, I saw it and Colm Meaney was fucking dire. I like the guy, but he was not good at all in that part.
 
People looked at the promo's, thought "Time traveling cop? We've seen this before." and didn't give it a second notice. A shame too.
 
Maybe the original U.S. version would have done better. From what I remember reading, they filmed the first pilot with an almost totally different cast, including Colm Meaney in what became the Harvey Keitel character.

I doubt it would have done better, I saw it and Colm Meaney was fucking dire. I like the guy, but he was not good at all in that part.
^ This.

It is beyond amazing how much better the show got when it was retooled, recast, and the setting changed to New York. Even Jason O'Mara, who wasn't very good in the first pilot, improved dramatically with all the changes.
 
The ratings dropped quite a bit when they moved from being after Grey's Anatomy to being after Lost. Also, this show couldn't have been cheap to make.
 
Why wasn't anybody watching it? I don't get it, it was good!

I checked out the first episode and neither the characters nor the premise grabbed me. The 1970s styling was fun, the music was fun, Harvey Keitel and Michael Imperioli were fun, but that just wasn't enough. For me to stick around, I'd need some reason to care about the main guy and why was he in the past, and that just wasn't there.

I don't have a Nielsens box anyway, but just for the record...most of the time when I bail on a show early, it's because they didn't answer that all-important question, Why Should I Care? If I hang around for a series, they've answered that question and then if I bail it's because the writing, acting or some other crucial element is badly done.

I don't know what this show could have done to grab my interest. A more charismatic lead actor, perhaps? The actor just came off as a dull lump. But even that probably wouldn't work. I just dislike cop shows - there are way too many of them already. I do like shows set in historical time periods, but more distant time periods would be more interesting. Not anything after 1960. How about a cop show set in the 1920s? That would be fun. Also, I really dislike the way sci fi shows are required to have a cop-show element nowadays. Why can't we have sci fi without the crutch?

There's a fatal curse that strikes down most US imports of UK shows. It hasn't hit The Office, but most others die within a few weeks of being put out on air due to the fact that they can't really recapture the magic of the original.
Most new shows die regardless of where they came from. Maybe the track record for imported ideas is worse than average, but I wouldn't know why that would be. Viewers neither know or care where the ideas come from, and a lot of the ideas aren't particularly original to begin with, so there's nothing "imported" about them - they're the kind of stuff anyone could have come up with. If you listed the premises for imported show ideas vs ideas Hollywood came up with on their own, would anyone really be able to tell there was anything different between those lists?

Maybe imported ideas are doing worse than average. The new slate of fall pilots doesn't have many among them. Why bother paying for ideas that don't pan out any better than the ideas you can think up yourself?

The ratings dropped quite a bit when they moved from being after Grey's Anatomy to being after Lost.
Ah, the Lost deathslot. Nothing can follow that show because a) it looks bad by comparison; b) Lost is so intense that everyone is still recovering from the shock afterwards; and c) we're all on the internet yakking about it and not in the mood to watch any more TV right then.
 
Last edited:
I loved it, watched it religiously and, if you've read any of my other comments/posts regarding new shows, then you're aware that my liking a show is darn near the kiss of death for it no matter how good it is.;)
 
There's a fatal curse that strikes down most US imports of UK shows. It hasn't hit The Office, but most others die within a few weeks of being put out on air due to the fact that they can't really recapture the magic of the original. I watched the US Life on Mars, and ended up deleting it as I was bored with it after the first five minutes. Maybe it's just because it didn't have the magnificent Gene Hunt that Philip Glenister created, or maybe because I just don't like Americanized versions of UK TV shows, but it didn't gel for me.

That and a lot of things get lost in translation.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top