• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why Bill Shatner speaks the way he does

I suspect his pieces looked like that because he does run them ragged. His current rug, in fact, looks worn thin. Instead of respecting his rug, he does everything to his head that he'd do if he still had his real hair. He's wearing helmets and hats of all varieties, for his various exploits. He's jumping in the pool with it on with all of those chemicals in there. If he had a closetful of hairpieces, it would be fine ... but he just buys the one and puts it through its paces, until it tears, or hair starts falling out of it. I'm typing all of this, like he's still the age he was in STAR TREK II. The Man's pushing 90, but even now, he treats his rugs like they're disposable.
 
Best Shatner impression ever

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Could it be that some of these early TV actors, like Shatner, got their start in live theater? Would that have any bearing on an actor's style?
 
Could it be that some of these early TV actors, like Shatner, got their start in live theater? Would that have any bearing on an actor's style?
In Shatner's case, I've heard that said before, yeah. I can't remember where though.
 
Examples of Shatner's goofy acting are him as Mirror Kirk and channeling the personality of Janice Lester in Turnabout Intruder, lol. Examples of his exquisite and powerful acting are littered throughout the TOS movies. He's honed his craft or returned to his earlier form and he can certainly act with the best of them.

His mode of speech is easily lampooned (check out the youtube video in my sig). But that alone makes no comment on his ability or the worthiness of his style. Good actors and bad actors can be lampooned alike.
 
I think Shatner's biography says that he was stage trained, like Off Broadway in Canada, or something to that effect.
 
Could it be that some of these early TV actors, like Shatner, got their start in live theater? Would that have any bearing on an actor's style?

In Shatner's case, I've heard that said before, yeah. I can't remember where though.

I think Shatner's biography says that he was stage trained, like Off Broadway in Canada, or something to that effect.

A biography I read said that Shatner had been a member of the Royal Canadian Shakespeare Theatre Company. If this is true, or even if was merely part of a local Shakespeare company, he had much the same training that Patrick Stewart had, but got in front of a camera much earlier in his career. This would have had an effect on his performances.
 
Could it be that some of these early TV actors, like Shatner, got their start in live theater? Would that have any bearing on an actor's style?
He, along with many other film and TV actors who started careers before 1960, trained for theatre and in a style that was intentionally somewhat exaggerated so the people in the farthest seats could hear and see expressions, line delivery and so on. In the hands of capable directors, such actors could dial it back for the more intimate camera acting. With weak direction, they often fell back on old reflexes. It is an issue in reverse as well. Actors who've had primarily been in TV or film productions, and who do it well, are not necessarily all that good on the stage.
 
This might be a good time to take a look at Maurice LaMarche's talk like William Shatner instructional video:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

But a couple of things related to the general conversation:

I interned on a documentary film where I transcribed audio and video dialogue. I got to see how people actually talk, detached from the actual conversation, and noticed how people generally stumble and pause, but not usually like Shatner. They do tend to wait for the other to finish talking more than they listen, because the train of thought would generally continue from whatever that person said before the other person started talking.

As someone who's done a lot of performing over the past couple of decades, I've only just done Shakespeare starting with the current play I'm doing playing Ferdinand in Love's Labour's Lost (in Space). One of the first pieces of direction I got was that the verse should be delivered in an alternating pentameter style. It seemed a bit unnatural at first, and to me, a bit like Shatner. I felt like I finally had some potential insight into why he delivers his lines the way he does.

If this guy did a "serious" impression rather then a caricature he would sound JUST like Shatner. He could voice Kirk. Wow.
 
Breathing life into this almost-dead thread:

In the performance of his one-man show that I saw, Shatner specifically traced this style of acting to doing "The World of Suzie Wong" on stage in 1958 with France Nuyen. He said Nuyen was new to the stage and often forgot her lines, saying something else that wouldn't lead into his line. While thinking of how to get the story back on track, he would say something like "Suzie... just... what... doyoumean... by... that?

Certainly an exaggerated if not fabricated story, but funny.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top