I think that's the first (and probably only) time anyone has ever suggested that Shatner's stilted delivery is anything remotely realistic. In my life, I've never heard anyone speak that way. Maybe. It's a. Regional...thing.
Are you really the only person who complains about Scott Bakula? There's a reason his gazelle speech is a thing of mockery, and it's not just the writing.Listen to Al Gore give a speech sometime. People made fun of his pauses as much as they did Shatner's. And as I said, Scott Bakula's delivery is enormously more pause-laden than Shatner's, so why am I the only one who ever complains about him?
Are you really the only person who complains about Scott Bakula?
I think Scott Bakula's speeches as Archer are consistently terrible. The stilted delivery of "Starfleet seems to think we're ready to begin our mission" that turned up in early Enterprise trailers was a recurring joke in my house. (I was really disappointed when one of them was used as a scene in Star Trek: The Ultimate Voyage.) I guess I don't complain about him a lot, though, because I don't have much reason to mention Enterprise at all.As far as I'm aware, at least.
I definitely notice it, more on the show than in the films. It wasn't constant, or how he speaks in real life from what I've seen, but it was there. As Christopher said, impressions are usually a caricature and they pick out mannerisms which they lean on. Just doing an impression of a voice isn't as funny as leaning on stranger things. Christopher Walken is another great example, but in his case I think he (especially in comedy) has a tendency to do an impression of comedians doing a Walken impression. Though there are examples of Walken being Walken before his famous impression, I'm thinking of the "I'm happiest...IN the saddle" from A View To A Kill. Something is rarely just made up out of nothing, or else it probably wouldn't be that funny or recognizable as an impression. And the Shatner impression does come from real examples, especially in TOS. Though, as Christopher again pointed out, the Gerald Ford character from SNL was kind of a reach. I think he tripped once, and Chevy seized on that as an opportunity to do pratfalls. Otherwise it was a terrible "impression" as there was seemingly no attempt to look or sound like him. Just fall down.
I remember seeing a compendium of Ford's falls, though it was a very long time ago. There were several of them, maybe five or six. You really got the impression that he was a klutz.
President Obama is another one who pauses while speaking. Impersonators key in on that.When I did my recent binge-rewatch of Supergirl's first season, I noticed that Jeremy Jordan as Winn Schott had a habit of, of constantly stammering and, and repeat, repeating his, his, his words. And I didn't even register that the first time around, because it's the way a lot of people talk and we just adjust for it when we listen.
A trend in modern TV writing, particularly from people like Joss Whedon and Aaron Sorkin, is deliberately writing characters who stumble or struggle with words, or to metatextually have characters fail to think of a clever bon mot and have to fall back on vagueness, like "Do you want to call down the wrath of the whatever from high atop the thing?" or "That's as awful as... some really awful thing!" So both in acting and writing these days, you have things being done deliberately that would once have been strictly the stuff of blown takes and blooper reels.
President Obama is another one who pauses while speaking. Impersonators key in on that.
Though, as Christopher again pointed out, the Gerald Ford character from SNL was kind of a reach. I think he tripped once, and Chevy seized on that as an opportunity to do pratfalls.
President Obama is another one who pauses while speaking. Impersonators key in on that.
Spock did say he tried to teach him. I guess it's not easy for a human to apply the pinch.Kirk should have studied more on how to apply a Vulcan Death Grip.![]()
He's pausing to think carefully of his next words. I do that sometimes tooAs I recall, the episode with the most Shatnerisms was "Amok Time." Several examples from just a couple scenes:
"Why.............. must..... he die!?!?!" Why within eight days?!?!? Explain!!!
"You............ keep saying that, are you a doctor or aren't you?"
"Well.... there's no.. need to be embarrassed about it, Mister Spock. It happens to the birds and the bees."
"I guess the rest of us assumed it's done...... quite logically."
Maybe the script writer's typewriter was defective and it accidentally added extra spaces and letters to Shatner's lines....
"I'mmmmmm......Cappppp....tainnnn.....Kirrrrrk!!!![]()
Back in the 1950s and '60s there were plenty of jokes about Method actors, disdainfully referred to as "mumbling, scratching" actors by performers of the old school.. . . I mean, most actors today favor a more naturalistic style than was common in the '60s. In fact, it was around the '60s that the standards of acting were starting to change and a more naturalistic performance style was beginning to catch on -- actors mumbling rather than enunciating clearly, talking over and interrupting each other, stammering and "uh"-ing, speaking more like regular people.
And it's annoying as hell. I don't watch TV or movies to hear people stumbling and groping for words. I prefer the more traditional styles of screenwriting and acting. Give me crisp, literate dialogue with characters speaking in complete and cogent sentences.A trend in modern TV writing, particularly from people like Joss Whedon and Aaron Sorkin, is deliberately writing characters who stumble or struggle with words, or to metatextually have characters fail to think of a clever bon mot and have to fall back on vagueness, like "Do you want to call down the wrath of the whatever from high atop the thing?" or "That's as awful as... some really awful thing!"
And also in cinematography. Can anyone say "lens flare"?So both in acting and writing these days, you have things being done deliberately that would once have been strictly the stuff of blown takes and blooper reels.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.