I was visited by the ghost of Arthur C Clarke, who confirmed that there is no such thing as an afterlife.I just happened to be doing some EVP work in my basement, when out of the blue the ghost of Barbara Walters yelled at me![]()
I was visited by the ghost of Arthur C Clarke, who confirmed that there is no such thing as an afterlife.I just happened to be doing some EVP work in my basement, when out of the blue the ghost of Barbara Walters yelled at me![]()
Oh, I agree, Mr. Awe and Camelopard. Despite my preference for rational explanations (or perhaps a more accurate way to state this would be "my dislike for wacko explanations when a reasonable one is available"), I'd kind of like it if ghosts were real. I'm not sure why, really - whether because it fits in with my view of the immortality of the human spirit, or because I like the idea of a world in which not everything is rational and material, or just because it would be, you know, kind of cool.![]()
Plus I had one pretty creepy experience myself - one for which there are rational explanations, just not very satisfying or convincing ones - and it would be nice to know that I had a reason to feel as creeped out as I admit that I did.
But I do like the idea of real ghosts...
Unfortunately, despite the coolness and dispite that one creepy experience, I don't think there are such things. I have to think that if ghosts really did exist, somebody over the centuries would have managed to acquire some sort of proof by now besides anecdotal evidence, pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo, and really shoddy-looking photos and video that could only convince somebody who really wants to be convinced.
One of the most interesting theories on ghosts are the fact that they aren't really ghosts but imprints on time (hence why they do what they do repeatedly).
One of the most interesting theories on ghosts are the fact that they aren't really ghosts but imprints on time (hence why they do what they do repeatedly).
One of the most interesting theories on ghosts are the fact that they aren't really ghosts but imprints on time (hence why they do what they do repeatedly).
People are afraid of things they don't understand.
I have seen ghosts in my parent's house growing up and it's freaky. They obviously didn't hurt me but seeing someone who is dead is just an awkward experience. That and hearing your name being called in the dark when you're trying to sleep is enough to make you shit your pants.
One of the most interesting theories on ghosts are the fact that they aren't really ghosts but imprints on time (hence why they do what they do repeatedly).
And yes, I am well aware that most people will think I'm either crazy or a liar or both. Be that as it may, just thought it was worth adding to the conversation.
And yes, I am well aware that most people will think I'm either crazy or a liar or both. Be that as it may, just thought it was worth adding to the conversation.
I don't think you're crazy or a liar. My brother sees (yes, no preterit here) the same kind of things all the time (not so often now because he has find a way to control it) and I know for sure he's not lying to me.
I don't believe in ghosts, I believe in unexplained phonomenas. I'm sure there will be one day a rationnal way to explain everything (including why everyone around me sees things except me).
That's interesting. The neighbor I mentioned says that she's always been "sensitive" to the paranormal since she was very young. She could actually see them much more clearly and could, for instance, note that the lady's house coat had a floral pattern. I just saw white, and only in glimpses. I was apparently less "sensitive", but fell somewhere in the middle.
I'm a little forced to think that way. I'm rationnal but I love my brother and it's my duty as his little sister to listening to him and to support himAnd I like how you put that. I don't know what it was we were dealing with. Heck, I don't know what "ghosts" may be. But, I do believe there are things our current level of scientific knowledge cannot explain as of yet. Will be interesting if we figure it out some day.
One of the most interesting theories on ghosts are the fact that they aren't really ghosts but imprints on time (hence why they do what they do repeatedly).
If they are just imprints on time and nothing to do with lost souls or spirits or whatnot, why don't sightings of ghost animals outnumber the sightings of ghost people by millions to one?
After all, there are trillions of animals on the planet and only 7 billion humans. And most of those are fairly recent arrivals comparatively. Given how many people claim to have seen a ghost human, there should be ghost animals all over the place.
Because, and I forgot to post this, is the imprint on time, is something traumatic...
Because, and I forgot to post this, is the imprint on time, is something traumatic...
Oh well, that explains everything.
Since were talking rational explanations, how high on the Bundy Scale would this trauma have to register to qualify for a time imprint?
People are afraid of things they don't understand.
I have seen ghosts in my parent's house growing up and it's freaky. They obviously didn't hurt me but seeing someone who is dead is just an awkward experience. That and hearing your name being called in the dark when you're trying to sleep is enough to make you shit your pants.
People are afraid of things they don't understand.
I have seen ghosts in my parent's house growing up and it's freaky. They obviously didn't hurt me but seeing someone who is dead is just an awkward experience. That and hearing your name being called in the dark when you're trying to sleep is enough to make you shit your pants.
That's actually quite common. They're called hypnagogic hallucinations and they probably account for a lot of "ghost" sightings. It could be as minor as as hearing your name or as major as thinking a demon is attacking you.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.