• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why are Dr. Who books so bad?!

bismarck_1892

Captain
Captain
I have read eight books thus far, and out of eight there may have been one half-decent story. Most would not get a passing grade in a college creative writing class.

Is it the money or the talent pool from which these writers are recruted?

I'd like to read something interesting, otherwise its like throwing money away. And as much as I like Dr. Who, I really don't feel like doing that anymore.

Any thoughts?
 
I think that it would further discussion to actually say what eight books that you read.
Most would not get a passing grade in a college creative writing class.
Most science fiction stories wouldn't. And most college creative writing course takers would not get published.
 
It might help if you said what books you read. The ones based on the New Series are written for 12-year olds, in case you didn't know. (And are massively successful; among the best-selling hardback fiction in the UK, though they sell higher volumes over a longer period of time so don't pop up on the charts.)
 
There have been some real stinkers, but there have been quite a few I liked very much.

The Murder Game, The Final Sanction, Imperial Moon, and Verdigris come to mind.
 
So, again, which books have you read?


Shining Darkness - Not too bad.
Beautiful Chaos - Horrible
Wetworld - Horrible
The Eyelss - Horrible
The Doctor Trap - Horrible, Horrible
The Stone Rose - Horrible, Horrible
The Pirate Loop - Not entirely bad
The Last Dodo - Horrible

:lol:
 
There have been a couple that I rather liked.

Wolfsbane. It's a 4th Doctor story, although it's largely written from the perspectives of Sarah Jane Smith & Harry Sullivan. Also, Harry meets a mysterious figure who is strongly implied to be the 8th Doctor.

Loving the Alien. It's a pretty dark 7th Doctor story in which the Doctor crosses his own timeline to prevent Ace from dying. There's also a mad scientist splintering open the space-time continuum by constantly creating alternate timelines. He tries to improve humanity through cybernetic enhancements. He fails. The technology takes over. He time travels back to the beginning to start again. (Certain aspects of this novel were used for the David Tennant episodes "Rise of the Cybermen" & "The Age of Steel.") Also, there are giant ants.
 
Of those, I've only read The Stone Rose, and I was not a fan; it's what caused me to give up on the NSAs (along with the other two in that batch, The Resurrection Casket and The Feast of the Drowned).

I actually started The Eyeless this morning and I'm only a few chapters in, but I am enjoying it so far.
 
No its a problem for every other Who fan

It's not a problem for me and I'm 37. I just adjust my mindset before reading them. Like I do before watching an episode of 'The Sarah-Jane Adventures'.

Read "Judgement Of The Judoon" on Saturday and found it quite enjoyable. (And it gets bonus points for being a Veronica Mars crossover in disguise.)
 
I hear ya man. Apart from the old Target novilizations, the only Who novel I ever read was the 'New Adventures' book 'Legacy'. I think I gave up about halfway though out of sheer boredom and confusion. Haven't picked one up since.
 
I've read some of the earlier Nu-series novels (The Stone Rose, etc.) and found them to be quite enjoyable on the same level as the series itself. The multitude of original novels between 1989 and 2005 suffer from a lack of overall direction or creative control that a TV series would normally enjoy; this coupled with the innate ability for the Who franchise to accomodate practically every flavor of science fiction imaginable, has resulted in a VERY wide spectrum of interpretation of the Whoniverse.

Even with the so-called Cartmel Masterplan, which was supposed to completely retcon the Doctor into an even MORE Godlike figure than Davies' stories have made him, the novels never seemed to have an overall sense of direction or any sort of arc beyond a few novels at a time. They also seriously overdeveloped the Seventh Doctor (Time's Champion, anyone?) mostly because at the time they couldn't expand beyond the initial seven incarnations, resulting in a Doctor character so radically different from his origins (or even final season) he just wasn't IMO very interesting or relateable. The Eighth Doctor wadventures had less material to go on, but still resulted in many similar stories, which frequently (for him) involved memory loss or separation from the TARDIS for extended periods of time.

I was able to enjoy a few of the in-between novels, but IMO they've served their purpose. Give me more ninth and tenth Doctor stories, I say!

Mark
 
I'm not a 12-year-old, but I've rather enjoyed the new series novels that I have read. Some are better than others, but I haven't hated any of them.
 
I've read a few of the New Series novels, and I have to agree most aren't that great. The Story of Martha was a fairly decent book, but all the other ones I read were pretty forgettable.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top