• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why 9?

Huh? That is literally the opposite of what the phrase "Strange New Worlds" denotes. Granted, though, the show did a better job living up to the literal meaning of its title in its first season than in the second.

@Bad Thoughts you mean because it's not named after a new-to-us ship, station, person, planet, or at least one we haven't explored?

By that same token, LD's name would also suggest "nothing new here" - but since they're supposed to be a ship that often revisits previously seen planets, it makes sense.
The phrase is literally a quotation from the opening oratorio of every episode of the original series, which itself provides phrases repeated in dialogue throughout the franchise. "The final frontier," "these are the voyages," "five-year mission," "to seek out new life and civilizations," "where no man/one has gone before" have all figured in the titles of movies and episodes and have been dropped into dialogue. Doing so is a re-statement of purpose, perhaps to underline the nature of the series and its characters at a given point. It can also point to revivalism or back-to-basics approach, returning to past ideas (whether warranted or not). Despite "strange new worlds" suggesting going to new places, it all references back to the beginning of the franchise. Indeed, ST:SNW is very much a remix show. It introduces few new protagonists and brings back many that are familiar. Some may be a little different from past characterizations, but they are often developing into the well-known characters of the past or they are being filled out, given more motivation by the writing. The setting is presented with greater detail and opulence, but for the most part, they are the same locations: bridge, engineering, mess hall, sick bay, crews' quarters. A whole episode of TOS was revisited by SNW. So "Strange New Worlds" is a perfect title: we're being more adventurous in a way we used to be. And it points to a largely conservative approach, adjusting to contemporary sensibilities but pointing to the past.

(Does Lower Decks do the same? Yes, it is also a remix show that wears meta-narrative on its sleeve. The title does something different than "strange new worlds." It suggests taking the change in perspective from the original episode and making it the cornerstone of the series.)
 
Why 9?
A silly question, but have the creators/writers of DS9 ever explained why they picked 9
Also not mentioned yet (although it varied) likely inconsequential:
9 appears to be the number of what became the primary cast.
9oo9zg.jpg


9 (with some characters swapped over time) seemed a somewhat recurring structure for that gen:
9oob3a.gif

9oobdx.gif
 
Last edited:
Why 9?
A silly question, but have the creators/writers of DS9 ever explained why they picked 9
Because everyone knows 9 is the best number:
And once you see it, it's everywhere:;)
(live-action series production order:)

1. TOS (66
2. TMP (79
3. TWOK (82
4. TSFS (84
5. TVH (86
6. TNG (87
7. TFF (89
8. TUC (91
9. DS9 (93

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
9oyh60.gif

@jump to the Vortex!
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
9oyg8w.gif

72f1f039625dcca4c2c5d17e785bd694.jpg

9oynu4.gif

Tkbqo9TmLOiM05PnxemBhCnob3_Gnxh5L-KQBUZp0wfqtb9Fjw-T16hF6D1OuYDj6XC6JE_YkejtyKn-BCfPE9v9p37iARhYPy_NEXus_rd0PO7HknRleNRgxrVtf5Fgz1OpAYDFOTjZsFlVhS5e83Xmq7n_fxZ6gNsCRQpHcSjPMMfvjwzmuHvGgg

123456789
74205 = the registry number of the USS Defiant
7+4+2+0+5 = 18 (the "Defiant" equation = missing 369)
8+1= 9 and it's captain can navigate the vortex.
9oyslv.gif

eyebrow-raise-okay.gif

:p
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: kkt
If this were a franchise where having zillions of ships appear on screen, then this would be Deep Space Eight Six Seven Five Three Oh Nine.
 
"The Next Generation" was the proposed title that Greg Strangis pitched (the one set on the Odyssey and might have literally been "the next generation") and they just reused it for the series we know.
But even still it still works as a series title for the audience even if it's not literal in-universe.
 
Also not mentioned yet (although it varied) likely inconsequential:
9 appears to be the number of what became the primary cast.
9oo9zg.jpg


9 (with some characters swapped over time) seemed a somewhat recurring structure for that gen:
9oob3a.gif

9oobdx.gif
It's not likely inconsequential, it's definitely inconsequential, Voyager is the only show to have 9 series regulars the entire time, TNG stared with 9 but got reduced to 7, DS9 started with 8 and got expanded to 9. And of course don't mention Enterprise (intentionally I assume because it doesn't fit your argument) which had 7 cast members for its entire run.

Some shows having 9 cast members at some point has nothing to do with why DS9 is called DS9. Especially when DS9 didn't even start with 9, if the producers wanted to be cheeky and have the title of the show reference the number of main characters they either would have had 9 main cast members from the start or the show would have been Deep Space Eight.
 
It's not likely inconsequential, it's definitely inconsequential, Voyager is the only show to have 9 series regulars the entire time, TNG stared with 9 but got reduced to 7, DS9 started with 8 and got expanded to 9. And of course don't mention Enterprise (intentionally I assume because it doesn't fit your argument) which had 7 cast members for its entire run.

Some shows having 9 cast members at some point has nothing to do with why DS9 is called DS9. Especially when DS9 didn't even start with 9, if the producers wanted to be cheeky and have the title of the show reference the number of main characters they either would have had 9 main cast members from the start or the show would have been Deep Space Eight.
Wow you broke through the code!:lol:
Apparently the truth lies in Montgomery Scott's hands.
... once you see it, it's everywhere:;)
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top