Who should have directed TMP if Robert Wise hadn't been available?

[CoveTom]

I'd rather know who people actually were than only be allowed to have idealized notions of them available to me.

I don't trust one sided accounts. Everyone waited until he was dead to shit on him. I know he was a flawed man, but I don't think everyone speaking ill of him is giving the full story either.

 

[Firebird]

I don't trust one sided accounts. Everyone waited until he was dead to shit on him. I know he was a flawed man, but I don't think everyone speaking ill of him is giving the full story either.

Victims are usually afraid of retribution while the perpetrator is still living, hence why many wait until they've died or are no longer in a position of power.

 

[TREK_GOD_1]

I'd rather know who people actually were than only be allowed to have idealized notions of them available to me.

I moved past that very idealized "Great Bird of the Galaxy" nonsense after seeing Roddenberry in person at conventions in the early to mid 1970s; even from the information about TOS' production available up to that time, it was clear he was a revisionist salesman trying to brand himself as the one and only mastermind behind TOS' successes, yet that "somehow" all vanished when he put his creative stamp on TMP, arguably the TOS film most removed from all that made TOS a cultural phenomenon.

 

[CoveTom]

Victims are usually afraid of retribution while the perpetrator is still living, hence why many wait until they've died or are no longer in a position of power.

Which doesn't change the fact that the accounts we get today are one-sided accounts and may not be 100% accurate.

 

[Firebird]

Which doesn't change the fact that the accounts we get today are one-sided accounts and may not be 100% accurate.

So, we just completely disregard their testimony of abuse simply because the perpetrator made a TV show we happen to like?

 

[JonnyQuest037]

I don't trust one sided accounts. Everyone waited until he was dead to shit on him. I know he was a flawed man, but I don't think everyone speaking ill of him is giving the full story either.

Those aren't one-sided accounts. They're a multitude of people with a variety of perspectives giving their experiences of the man. The fact that many, many of the accounts happen to be negative doesn't make them "one-sided." One the contrary, it makes it very likely that at least some of those experiences are true.

Off the top of my head, here's a list of ST creatives who've shared negative experiences they had with Roddenberry:

D.C. Fontana
Dave Gerrold
Bob Justman
Herb Solow
Alexander Courage
William Shatner
Leonard Nimoy
Gary Lockwood
James Doohan
Harlan Ellison
Harold Livingston
Nicholas Meyer
Herb Wright
Tracy Tormé
Melinda Snodgrass

I'm sure there are more I'm forgetting about right now. But ask yourself what's more likely: That ALL of these people were wrong and/or lying about Gene Roddenberry, or that Gene Roddenberry could sometimes be an asshole?